So? That hasn’t stopped her from never placing blame on her self in the past.

Yeah, neither does/did Clinton. Attacking Obama as an “out of touch, elitist” is not only the kind of groundless bullshit that conservatives like to manipulate the media with, it’s also the worst thing that Clinton could have done for her own campaign, should she become the nominee. As I said in another thread, Clinton and her supporters have now validated the reactionary premise of this classic conservative canard — “liberals are elitists!!!!” — and will have no grounds on which to rebuff it should it, once again, be leveled at Clinton during a general election campaign. It’s easy to see Oliver’s point.

Since Clinton has slammed Obama for being out of touch with religious and gun-owning small town residents, she’s opened herself up to questions from conservatives about her own religious, gun culture bona fides. In fact, she’s been so righteous in her attacks on Obama over this issue, conservatives will demand nothing less than verifiable proof that Clinton can assemble a rifle blinded-folded while reciting the lord’s prayer in a church pew. If Clinton, by some miracle, wins the nomination, conservatives will mercilessly hoist her on her own petard. That’s blowback, my friend. And Clinton will have no one to blame but her self.

So it’s all fine, as long as you don’t mind sounding like Gingrich.

Really what she said is right. The fact that she either is an atheist or a hardcore religious nut, rather she fights for gun rights or not it doesn’t matter. It isn’t about her, it’s about what Obama said.

In a strange way the Clintons are once again showing the folly of that ’60s mantra: If it feels good… do it.