How Conservatives Lie: Mike Gallagher Edition
Tweet
Con radio host Mike Gallagher, adding to the collective race-based attack coming on the right vs. Sen. Obama makes this convenient deception:
When even the Washington Post publishes an article entitled, “Obama’s Abortion Extremism”, you know that something astonishing is going on here.
Wow! The Washington Post published that in an article? Golly, that’s a mighty loaded description for a straight news article, especially in one of the country’s leading newspapers. I wonder…
Oh, yes, here it is in the Post: “Obama’s Abortion Extremism”.
What’s that you say?
What kind of article is it? Let’s see. Hmm. It’s in the “Columns” section of the paper, and it’s header says “op-ed columnist”. So, that’s an opinion piece and not a straight article as Gallagher made it seem. That’s awful deceptive.
And what’s that?
Who wrote it? Well, it says here that the author is a Michael Gerson. I wonder what sort of political connections he might have, surely he’s an independent thinker, a maverick like John McCain?
He served as President George W. Bush’s chief speechwriter from 2001 until June 2006, and as a senior policy advisor from 2000 through June 2006.
Oh, well eff that.
So Mike Gallagher pretends as if a straight news article said something, when in fact the article was written by a conservative hack former member of the Bush administration. Even worse, the Gerson op-ed itself contains falsehoods about Sen. Obama.
Washington Post columnist Michael Gerson suggested that Sen. Barack Obama should “come out strongly for policies that would reduce the number of abortions — support for pregnant women, abstinence education, the responsible promotion of birth control.” In fact, Obama has advocated the policies Gerson mentioned: “education” that “include[s] abstinence” and “information about contraception.”
This has been another edition of “How Conservatives Lie”. I will never run out of material for this.
5 Responses to “How Conservatives Lie: Mike Gallagher Edition”
GOP Rep. Spencer Bachus Facing House Ethics Probe For Insider Trading
Jennifer Aniston Reportedly Pregnant With Twins
PHOTOS: Tamara Ecclestone At The Langham Hotel
Red Front? “Center For American Freedom” Logo Echoes Communist Style
Romney Calls For Defunding Planned Parenthood, Wife Was A Donor
GOP Fundraising Email Asks Supporters To “Knock Out” Obama
Romney Comes Up Limp In Nevada
Obama Opens Lead On Romney In New Poll
Latest Entries
Why Do Liberals Support Drone Strikes?
Weekly Standard Rolls Out The Iraq Argument For Iran
Equal Polarization, My Ass
Some Crazy Stuff That Happened In World War II
Maryland Republican Campaign Funds Used To Defend Voter Suppression
The Obama Jobs Record In One Graph
Martin O’Malley All In For Marriage Equality
Newt Gingrich, Filled With More Excrement Than Your Average Politician
New Year, Powerline Still Stupid
Thanks Again
Meta
Blogroll
Disclaimer
The views on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

Michael Gerson, the man singlehandedly responsible for North Korea getting the bomb.
With most Republicans I would agree this is just a lie from Gallagher, but I’ve never been impressed that Mike Gallagher is intelligent enough to lie. He’s enough of a dipshit, he might not understand what a tool he is.
(Still your pic of the other Gallagher is unfair to that Gallagher, who no matter what anyone says, I shall always love for his smashing antics.)
In other news, your blog read out and the double column blue text widgets to the right are looking pretty good. But your celebrity cheesecake photos needs a bit of work, and has no Anne Hathaway on it at all. Hmm.
The right likes to call the Post “liberal” despite them being war cheerleaders and giving wingnut welfare jobs to 43′s wingmen
Come on… it’s Gallagher, what did you expect – honest journalism? Does it surprise you that he’s drifted down to the con radio host level? ROFLMAO – I actually thought he’d gracefully faded away – but no, he’s holding on tooth and nail, and whatever will work to keep him topical (whatever the audience) is what he’ll do.
Be glad he hasn’t resorted to the rhetorical/political/commentary version of smashing a watermelon… oh wait – scratch that.
He’s preaching hatred under sheeps clothing. How sure is he of salvation?