Dear James Carville: Save The Drama For Your Mama

8:33 pm EST March 29th, 2008 | Media, Politics | 5 Comments

I see no need for catfighting of the sort embraced by James Carville to be published in the “A” section of one the country’s top 5 newspapers. We have a war on, a fiscal crisis, global hunger, disease and murder, and that merits James Carville writing what amounts to a personal phone call or an e-mail in the news section of the paper.

Cajun, please.

Topic:

Related Posts

«
»

5 Responses to “Dear James Carville: Save The Drama For Your Mama”

  1. Cali Tejano says:
    March 30, 2008 at 12:20 am

    Gollum’s gone crazy again. Can someone remind him that Crossfire was cancelled a long time ago?

  2. The Grand Panjandrum says:
    March 30, 2008 at 12:38 am

    After Clinton’s sit down with Richard Mellon Scaife where she took her cheap shot at Obama I thought of an old James Carville quote about Bush I, and I paraphrase: “If Clinton’s heart was on fire, I wouldn’t piss down her throat to put it out.”

    I guess Carville was right in one respect–never apologize. You can rest assured, I won’t.

    Besides, if anyone is a Judas its Senator Clinton and her husband. Reverend Wright didn’t throw them under the bus in Bill’s hour of need. But I guess that cardinal principal called loyalty only goes one way, eh?

  3. Sean D. Martin says:
    March 30, 2008 at 1:44 am

    Carville: Fully aware of this supercharged environment in which the slightest slight is elevated to the most egregious insult, I waded in — okay, dove in — by demonstrating what constitutes a real insult.

    So he only did it just to teach us all a lesson?

    Carville: I was a little-known political consultant until Bill Clinton made me. When he came upon hard times, I felt it my duty — whatever my personal misgivings — to stick by him.

    OK, I get the standing by a friend when they are going thru hard times. They need your support and nobody else is hurt by your giving it. It’s what friends are for.

    But blind loyalty to a friend no matter what is not a good thing. When the friend is way out of line you tell them so, you don’t enable them.

    And in this particular case, the topic at hand is who would be the better president. It isn’t just a matter of helping your friend when they are in a rough patch. It means helping your friend to the detriment of many others who will have to face the consequences of the lesser person being president.

  4. jr says:
    March 30, 2008 at 8:58 am

    The Naderness of this crew is sickening. They can’t wait to help McCain put “strict constructionist” judges on the bench to bring Southern Baptist Sharia to our country

  5. Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle says:
    March 31, 2008 at 9:00 am

    OK, I get the standing by a friend when they are going thru hard times. They need your support and nobody else is hurt by your giving it. It’s what friends are for.

    But blind loyalty to a friend no matter what is not a good thing. When the friend is way out of line you tell them so, you don’t enable them.

    Doesn’t this sound like most of the crew in the Boosh White House?