<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Yes We Will&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/04/yes-we-will/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/04/yes-we-will/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:33:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/04/yes-we-will/#comment-56297</link>
		<dc:creator>duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 22:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3994#comment-56297</guid>
		<description>As Rex Mundane said a few days ago, it is the difference between WANTING to vote for Obama vs. HAVING to vote for Clinton.

Don&#039;t care who the dem is, they will have my support, as with the last 3 generals. But, just like the last 2  elections, if it&#039;s Clinton, I&#039;ll be holding my nose.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Rex Mundane said a few days ago, it is the difference between WANTING to vote for Obama vs. HAVING to vote for Clinton.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t care who the dem is, they will have my support, as with the last 3 generals. But, just like the last 2  elections, if it&#8217;s Clinton, I&#8217;ll be holding my nose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/04/yes-we-will/#comment-56296</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 21:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3994#comment-56296</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;It is Obama that is currently being floated as the veep.&lt;/em&gt;

Really? Where?

And nobody is going to be &lt;em&gt;told to be &lt;/em&gt; VP. Suppose we get to the convention and Mr. Obama accepts the VP slot? Comes right out and says to the world, &quot;I think this is what&#039;s best.&quot;

You&#039;ll bail on him, right?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>It is Obama that is currently being floated as the veep.</em></p>
<p>Really? Where?</p>
<p>And nobody is going to be <em>told to be </em> VP. Suppose we get to the convention and Mr. Obama accepts the VP slot? Comes right out and says to the world, &#8220;I think this is what&#8217;s best.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll bail on him, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/04/yes-we-will/#comment-56295</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 21:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3994#comment-56295</guid>
		<description>Why is it so hard to recognize the resentment if Obama won the delegate fight but was told to stick to the veep slot? If he loses? Fine. But the idea of him winning but being nudged out is ridiculous. And the reverse is true - it would be silly if Sen. Clinton were the delegate leader and told to be the veep candidate. But that isn&#039;t being floated, from everything I&#039;ve seen. It is Obama that is currently being floated as the veep. No, it isn&#039;t about me. It&#039;s about a lot of us. I don&#039;t just cavalierly discuss not supporting the Democratic nominee. But this would be the way to force that.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it so hard to recognize the resentment if Obama won the delegate fight but was told to stick to the veep slot? If he loses? Fine. But the idea of him winning but being nudged out is ridiculous. And the reverse is true &#8211; it would be silly if Sen. Clinton were the delegate leader and told to be the veep candidate. But that isn&#8217;t being floated, from everything I&#8217;ve seen. It is Obama that is currently being floated as the veep. No, it isn&#8217;t about me. It&#8217;s about a lot of us. I don&#8217;t just cavalierly discuss not supporting the Democratic nominee. But this would be the way to force that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/04/yes-we-will/#comment-56294</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 19:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3994#comment-56294</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see now.

&lt;em&gt;Somebody&lt;/em&gt; I used to read was always hammering on NARAL for not supporting Dem candidates, no matter what.

Anybody remember who that could have been?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see now.</p>
<p><em>Somebody</em> I used to read was always hammering on NARAL for not supporting Dem candidates, no matter what.</p>
<p>Anybody remember who that could have been?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mingus</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/04/yes-we-will/#comment-56293</link>
		<dc:creator>mingus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3994#comment-56293</guid>
		<description>The narcissism here (and I&#039;m sure on the pro-Clinton blogs as well) is astounding (as is the asinine &quot;back of the bus&quot; anology. Should Clinton win the popular vote among all the contested states, a real possibility, but lose the pledged delegate vote should she be relegated back to the kitchen?)  In any event, it&#039;s been said before, but this election is not about YOU (and you know who I&#039;m talking about).  As Elightened Liberal posted - if nothing else, the make-up of the Supreme Court going forward should determine where your vote will be cast no matter who wins the nomination.  Obama and Clinton supporters should fight hard for their candidate, but please get over yourselves before putting out garbage about not supporting the Democratic candidate if he or she isn&#039;t your first choice.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The narcissism here (and I&#8217;m sure on the pro-Clinton blogs as well) is astounding (as is the asinine &#8220;back of the bus&#8221; anology. Should Clinton win the popular vote among all the contested states, a real possibility, but lose the pledged delegate vote should she be relegated back to the kitchen?)  In any event, it&#8217;s been said before, but this election is not about YOU (and you know who I&#8217;m talking about).  As Elightened Liberal posted &#8211; if nothing else, the make-up of the Supreme Court going forward should determine where your vote will be cast no matter who wins the nomination.  Obama and Clinton supporters should fight hard for their candidate, but please get over yourselves before putting out garbage about not supporting the Democratic candidate if he or she isn&#8217;t your first choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/04/yes-we-will/#comment-56292</link>
		<dc:creator>duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3994#comment-56292</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Heh.&lt;/i&gt;

Instapundit on Line two. Something about plagiarism.


Given the newly-found powers of the office of the Vice-President, I&#039;m not sure &quot;back of the bus&quot; is applicable. Either one of the two in the VP office is gonna clean house and take names.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Heh.</i></p>
<p>Instapundit on Line two. Something about plagiarism.</p>
<p>Given the newly-found powers of the office of the Vice-President, I&#8217;m not sure &#8220;back of the bus&#8221; is applicable. Either one of the two in the VP office is gonna clean house and take names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enlightened Liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/04/yes-we-will/#comment-56291</link>
		<dc:creator>Enlightened Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3994#comment-56291</guid>
		<description>Alito appointed, not elected.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alito appointed, not elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enlightened Liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/04/yes-we-will/#comment-56290</link>
		<dc:creator>Enlightened Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3994#comment-56290</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a moot point because Obama will win, but Hillary will beat McCain, unless disaffected Democrats stay home.  Then we all need to be prepared for people to the right of Alito to be elected.  He will NOT govern from the center.  He has always talked like a moderate but operated as a movement conservative.  I&#039;m not going to let MY vote make that happen.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a moot point because Obama will win, but Hillary will beat McCain, unless disaffected Democrats stay home.  Then we all need to be prepared for people to the right of Alito to be elected.  He will NOT govern from the center.  He has always talked like a moderate but operated as a movement conservative.  I&#8217;m not going to let MY vote make that happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: z_adura</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/04/yes-we-will/#comment-56289</link>
		<dc:creator>z_adura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3994#comment-56289</guid>
		<description>EL, the simple fact is that McCain will beat Hillary.  She&#039;d be running on &quot;experience&quot; against a candidate with 50 years of public service.  This will be a fiasco and one I don&#039;t want to be involved with.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EL, the simple fact is that McCain will beat Hillary.  She&#8217;d be running on &#8220;experience&#8221; against a candidate with 50 years of public service.  This will be a fiasco and one I don&#8217;t want to be involved with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enlightened Liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/04/yes-we-will/#comment-56288</link>
		<dc:creator>Enlightened Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 14:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3994#comment-56288</guid>
		<description>I meant z-adura actually.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant z-adura actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enlightened Liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/04/yes-we-will/#comment-56287</link>
		<dc:creator>Enlightened Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3994#comment-56287</guid>
		<description>Jackass, two words.  Supreme Court.  If you have any regard for what is left of the Constitution, you suck it up and vote for the Democratic nominee.  I will, regardless of who wins, because I don&#039;t want the underpinnings of our democracy to disappear.  This is EXACTLY what the wingers want, for us to be divided so that a third Bush term can commence.  McCain is a hard core right-winger, don&#039;t let him fool you.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jackass, two words.  Supreme Court.  If you have any regard for what is left of the Constitution, you suck it up and vote for the Democratic nominee.  I will, regardless of who wins, because I don&#8217;t want the underpinnings of our democracy to disappear.  This is EXACTLY what the wingers want, for us to be divided so that a third Bush term can commence.  McCain is a hard core right-winger, don&#8217;t let him fool you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/04/yes-we-will/#comment-56286</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 07:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3994#comment-56286</guid>
		<description>If, as is likely, Sen. Obama has the lead in delegates but is pushed to be the vice-presidential candidate, that is for all intents and purposes the back of the bus. Its telling a black leader that while he may be ahead, well, we&#039;ve decided that you are allowed to rise no higher than second fiddle.

It&#039;s the back of the bus.

(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/14769.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here is where Sen. Clinton put John McCain ahead of Barack Obama&lt;/a&gt;)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If, as is likely, Sen. Obama has the lead in delegates but is pushed to be the vice-presidential candidate, that is for all intents and purposes the back of the bus. Its telling a black leader that while he may be ahead, well, we&#8217;ve decided that you are allowed to rise no higher than second fiddle.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the back of the bus.</p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/14769.html" rel="nofollow">Here is where Sen. Clinton put John McCain ahead of Barack Obama</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somejackass</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/04/yes-we-will/#comment-56285</link>
		<dc:creator>somejackass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 06:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3994#comment-56285</guid>
		<description>bill said:
&lt;i&gt;was her ridiculous assertion that McCain&#039;s experience makes him a better choice than Obama in the Fall&lt;/i&gt;

I must have missed that. What are you referencing, exactly?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bill said:<br />
<i>was her ridiculous assertion that McCain&#8217;s experience makes him a better choice than Obama in the Fall</i></p>
<p>I must have missed that. What are you referencing, exactly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: z_adura</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/04/yes-we-will/#comment-56284</link>
		<dc:creator>z_adura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 06:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3994#comment-56284</guid>
		<description>somejackass, I am not afraid to vote for McCain.  The fact is that he would be a consensus president despite the fact that he&#039;s moving to the right in his public pronouncements.

Do I favor his foreign policy? Healthcare policy? Global warming policy? Tax policy? No to all of those.  Do we lose the Senate and House after Clinton gets 51% of the country to loathe her?  Absolutely.  In the big picture, I see Clinton as the worst possible position outcome for Democrats whether we ultimately win the presidency or not.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>somejackass, I am not afraid to vote for McCain.  The fact is that he would be a consensus president despite the fact that he&#8217;s moving to the right in his public pronouncements.</p>
<p>Do I favor his foreign policy? Healthcare policy? Global warming policy? Tax policy? No to all of those.  Do we lose the Senate and House after Clinton gets 51% of the country to loathe her?  Absolutely.  In the big picture, I see Clinton as the worst possible position outcome for Democrats whether we ultimately win the presidency or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill l.</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/04/yes-we-will/#comment-56283</link>
		<dc:creator>bill l.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 06:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3994#comment-56283</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not going to kiss Obama&#039;s ass.  His failure to lead on his U.N. committee is a serious issue.  Very serious.  Lieberman has done the same thing with his Katrina &quot;oversight&quot; and the fact that Obama thinks of Lieberman as his mentor is more than a bit unnerving.  I also tend to favor Hillary&#039;s economics more than Obama&#039;s, though they both have their flaws, some quite serious.  Ultimately, however, I felt that Obama&#039;s candidacy was more about re-invigorating a sense of political and social purpose in millions of avid supporters, particularly some of the most historically disenfranchised groups and minorities.  His rise to prominence seemed to inspire legions of voters to believe that they could fight a blatantly corrupt system, horrendously tilted in favor of the privileged and powerful.  In short, he gave a powerful national voice to the idea that &quot;grassroots&quot; works.

Sadly, the outcome of tonight, delegate counts aside, is that Mark Penn&#039;s coronation strategy is still in play and will be until the end, particularly among white women and now, perhaps, organized labor.  Really, wrap your head around that.  Unions tonight backed the woman whose husband put NAFTA into effect in the first place and who has never even raised a finger to oppose it or improve it until now (thanks to pressure from Edwards and Obama).  Why?  Well, people, and especially Americans, have political ADD.  If Clinton says she has been a longtime critic of NAFTA, why look any further than the past few months to test her credibility?  The media also happily play along and let their research departments take the night off while cheerfully regurgitating any and all party spin.  Her negative attacks ironically proving that voters act with their hearts and not their heads.

Still the kicker over the last few days, and for me, the moment that will forever tar Hillary as just the self serving bitch she is so often accused of being (very often unfairly, but not this time), was her ridiculous assertion that McCain&#039;s experience makes him a better choice than Obama in the Fall.  You simply do not, ever, go out of your way to boost your opponent.  Ever.  What happens if she gets the nomination?  Now McCain can squash what has been her only playing card since day one.  He has her on tape effectively calling him out as an equal.  And if Obama gets the nod?  McCain can play back that same tape and claim that even Obama&#039;s own party doesn&#039;t think he&#039;s up for the job.  Simply an unbelievable act of pure ego.  Better that the party should go down in flames than Hillary not get her righteous due.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not going to kiss Obama&#8217;s ass.  His failure to lead on his U.N. committee is a serious issue.  Very serious.  Lieberman has done the same thing with his Katrina &#8220;oversight&#8221; and the fact that Obama thinks of Lieberman as his mentor is more than a bit unnerving.  I also tend to favor Hillary&#8217;s economics more than Obama&#8217;s, though they both have their flaws, some quite serious.  Ultimately, however, I felt that Obama&#8217;s candidacy was more about re-invigorating a sense of political and social purpose in millions of avid supporters, particularly some of the most historically disenfranchised groups and minorities.  His rise to prominence seemed to inspire legions of voters to believe that they could fight a blatantly corrupt system, horrendously tilted in favor of the privileged and powerful.  In short, he gave a powerful national voice to the idea that &#8220;grassroots&#8221; works.</p>
<p>Sadly, the outcome of tonight, delegate counts aside, is that Mark Penn&#8217;s coronation strategy is still in play and will be until the end, particularly among white women and now, perhaps, organized labor.  Really, wrap your head around that.  Unions tonight backed the woman whose husband put NAFTA into effect in the first place and who has never even raised a finger to oppose it or improve it until now (thanks to pressure from Edwards and Obama).  Why?  Well, people, and especially Americans, have political ADD.  If Clinton says she has been a longtime critic of NAFTA, why look any further than the past few months to test her credibility?  The media also happily play along and let their research departments take the night off while cheerfully regurgitating any and all party spin.  Her negative attacks ironically proving that voters act with their hearts and not their heads.</p>
<p>Still the kicker over the last few days, and for me, the moment that will forever tar Hillary as just the self serving bitch she is so often accused of being (very often unfairly, but not this time), was her ridiculous assertion that McCain&#8217;s experience makes him a better choice than Obama in the Fall.  You simply do not, ever, go out of your way to boost your opponent.  Ever.  What happens if she gets the nomination?  Now McCain can squash what has been her only playing card since day one.  He has her on tape effectively calling him out as an equal.  And if Obama gets the nod?  McCain can play back that same tape and claim that even Obama&#8217;s own party doesn&#8217;t think he&#8217;s up for the job.  Simply an unbelievable act of pure ego.  Better that the party should go down in flames than Hillary not get her righteous due.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/04/yes-we-will/#comment-56282</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 06:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3994#comment-56282</guid>
		<description>Oh, and OW? If Vice President of the USA is &quot;back of the bus,&quot; then sign me up. I&#039;ll be happy to take the back seat.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and OW? If Vice President of the USA is &#8220;back of the bus,&#8221; then sign me up. I&#8217;ll be happy to take the back seat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/04/yes-we-will/#comment-56281</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 06:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3994#comment-56281</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;He&#039;s not sitting in the back of the bus.&lt;/em&gt;

You know, I&#039;m having a hard time reconciling the last seven years of singing the praises of &quot;Big Dog&quot; and pushing the notion of &quot;Brand Democrat,&quot; with this &quot;back of the bus&quot; rhetoric.

Who knows where we&#039;re headed? Wherever it is, I hope we don&#039;t hand the GOP a victory they don&#039;t deserve and I hope the Democrats continue to build the incredible roster of leaders they&#039;re offering the American people.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>He&#8217;s not sitting in the back of the bus.</em></p>
<p>You know, I&#8217;m having a hard time reconciling the last seven years of singing the praises of &#8220;Big Dog&#8221; and pushing the notion of &#8220;Brand Democrat,&#8221; with this &#8220;back of the bus&#8221; rhetoric.</p>
<p>Who knows where we&#8217;re headed? Wherever it is, I hope we don&#8217;t hand the GOP a victory they don&#8217;t deserve and I hope the Democrats continue to build the incredible roster of leaders they&#8217;re offering the American people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/04/yes-we-will/#comment-56280</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 06:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3994#comment-56280</guid>
		<description>Barring a miracle in her favor, Sen. Obama will be the delegate leader by at least 100. I see no reason why he would be the running mate and not the top of the ticket.

He&#039;s not sitting in the back of the bus.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barring a miracle in her favor, Sen. Obama will be the delegate leader by at least 100. I see no reason why he would be the running mate and not the top of the ticket.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s not sitting in the back of the bus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somejackass</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/04/yes-we-will/#comment-56279</link>
		<dc:creator>somejackass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 06:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3994#comment-56279</guid>
		<description>z_adura, I feel much the same as you, but where would you put your non-Hillary vote? Would you give it to McCain&#039;s and his Iraq policy? Nader? Or would you sit at home and not vote at all?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>z_adura, I feel much the same as you, but where would you put your non-Hillary vote? Would you give it to McCain&#8217;s and his Iraq policy? Nader? Or would you sit at home and not vote at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somejackass</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/04/yes-we-will/#comment-56278</link>
		<dc:creator>somejackass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 05:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3994#comment-56278</guid>
		<description>There will be no compromise. Obama would be a fool to pull Hillary in as Veep, with all of her negatives. A good portion of Obama&#039;s support is as much disapproval of Clinton as anything else, so a vote for that hybrid ticket is no longer a vote for change - and there goes the lead amongst independents. And after all the negativity she&#039;s pointed his way, I don&#039;t see why Obama would opt for a veep slot given he can just as easily gain some more experience and come back for another shot a little later in his political career. Not to mention the demographics situation - either candidate will feel real pressure to bring in a straight white protestant man as running mate.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There will be no compromise. Obama would be a fool to pull Hillary in as Veep, with all of her negatives. A good portion of Obama&#8217;s support is as much disapproval of Clinton as anything else, so a vote for that hybrid ticket is no longer a vote for change &#8211; and there goes the lead amongst independents. And after all the negativity she&#8217;s pointed his way, I don&#8217;t see why Obama would opt for a veep slot given he can just as easily gain some more experience and come back for another shot a little later in his political career. Not to mention the demographics situation &#8211; either candidate will feel real pressure to bring in a straight white protestant man as running mate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
