<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Empty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/03/empty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/03/empty/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: somejackass</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/03/empty/#comment-56345</link>
		<dc:creator>somejackass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 02:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4016#comment-56345</guid>
		<description>How many words do you know that start with O- and end with -ama? (Oh, mama doesn&#039;t count). I seem to remember mistakenly referring to al Jazeera (whos work I am actually quite fond of, being a far left bomb thrower) as &quot;al Qaeda&quot;, and you were there. So, slip of the tongues do happen

I might actually argue that the similar names actually work in Obama&#039;s favor (at least until the Democratic nomination is over) because anytime anyone slips up, everyone will jump all over them (for good reason).

But it&#039;s important to remember alot of times people are doing this subconsciously. This particular incident is purely speculation.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many words do you know that start with O- and end with -ama? (Oh, mama doesn&#8217;t count). I seem to remember mistakenly referring to al Jazeera (whos work I am actually quite fond of, being a far left bomb thrower) as &#8220;al Qaeda&#8221;, and you were there. So, slip of the tongues do happen</p>
<p>I might actually argue that the similar names actually work in Obama&#8217;s favor (at least until the Democratic nomination is over) because anytime anyone slips up, everyone will jump all over them (for good reason).</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s important to remember alot of times people are doing this subconsciously. This particular incident is purely speculation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nimrod Gently</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/03/empty/#comment-56344</link>
		<dc:creator>Nimrod Gently</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4016#comment-56344</guid>
		<description>A retraction isn&#039;t in order until it&#039;s proven that this didn&#039;t happen.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A retraction isn&#8217;t in order until it&#8217;s proven that this didn&#8217;t happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wellstone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/03/empty/#comment-56343</link>
		<dc:creator>Wellstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 03:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4016#comment-56343</guid>
		<description>This is outright irresponsible slime, from both Oliphant and you, Oliver.

First of all, it is not &quot;CALLS&quot;.

It is ONE anecdotal hearsay report to ONE person on &quot;the Swamp&quot;, the Tribune Blog.

Second, there&#039;s no corroboration, no actual investigative reporting, no confirmation, no attribution.  No nothing.  Not even an &quot;alleged&quot;.

Yet because it furthers an Obama-as-victim frame and confirms a negative Clinton frame, you jumped on it and posted it.

I&#039;m embarrassed for you, and surprised at you, Ollie.

I think a retraction is in order.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is outright irresponsible slime, from both Oliphant and you, Oliver.</p>
<p>First of all, it is not &#8220;CALLS&#8221;.</p>
<p>It is ONE anecdotal hearsay report to ONE person on &#8220;the Swamp&#8221;, the Tribune Blog.</p>
<p>Second, there&#8217;s no corroboration, no actual investigative reporting, no confirmation, no attribution.  No nothing.  Not even an &#8220;alleged&#8221;.</p>
<p>Yet because it furthers an Obama-as-victim frame and confirms a negative Clinton frame, you jumped on it and posted it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m embarrassed for you, and surprised at you, Ollie.</p>
<p>I think a retraction is in order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robster</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/03/empty/#comment-56342</link>
		<dc:creator>Robster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 02:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4016#comment-56342</guid>
		<description>James Oliphant is an author. You must not get out to bookstores that often.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Oliphant is an author. You must not get out to bookstores that often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/03/empty/#comment-56341</link>
		<dc:creator>duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4016#comment-56341</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I&#039;ve never heard of James Oliphant before, &lt;/i&gt;

Didn&#039;t he play the sheriff in Deadwood?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I&#8217;ve never heard of James Oliphant before, </i></p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t he play the sheriff in Deadwood?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/03/empty/#comment-56340</link>
		<dc:creator>jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4016#comment-56340</guid>
		<description>At first I thought your advertisement here was for &quot;MediaFast&quot;, a way to get off my addiction to bad media or something....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first I thought your advertisement here was for &#8220;MediaFast&#8221;, a way to get off my addiction to bad media or something&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/03/empty/#comment-56339</link>
		<dc:creator>jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4016#comment-56339</guid>
		<description>So do we actually know if:

a) this event actually occurred
b) it was an official clinton campaign call
c) it was an unofficial clinton campaign call
d) it was an Obama campaign call
e) it was a McCain campaign calll
f) it was someone else out playing tricks

Beats the hell out of me.

I&#039;ve never heard of James Oliphant before, so I could see any one of the four Oliphant, Clinton, Obama, McCain, being responsible for this.

I would have been more likely to believe it was HRC&#039;s campaign in some role if the report was slipping &quot;Osama&quot; for &quot;Obama&quot; but slipping OBL for BHO?  That raises a redflag for me.

(I could still believe it is HRC&#039;s campaign, I just don&#039;t see any reason to based on this one report.)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So do we actually know if:</p>
<p>a) this event actually occurred<br />
b) it was an official clinton campaign call<br />
c) it was an unofficial clinton campaign call<br />
d) it was an Obama campaign call<br />
e) it was a McCain campaign calll<br />
f) it was someone else out playing tricks</p>
<p>Beats the hell out of me.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never heard of James Oliphant before, so I could see any one of the four Oliphant, Clinton, Obama, McCain, being responsible for this.</p>
<p>I would have been more likely to believe it was HRC&#8217;s campaign in some role if the report was slipping &#8220;Osama&#8221; for &#8220;Obama&#8221; but slipping OBL for BHO?  That raises a redflag for me.</p>
<p>(I could still believe it is HRC&#8217;s campaign, I just don&#8217;t see any reason to based on this one report.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

