Breaking News
Comcast Close To Buying NBC
Kristy Sanchez-Trujillo
T-Mobile Outage
T-Mobile
Megan Gale
Sylvie Van Der Vaart
Clash Of The Titans
Ashley Neufeld
Afton Williamson
Kyrstin Gemar
Tesla Coil
Xperia X10
Cany Vossough
Reza Vossough
Ninel Conde
Julia Louis Dreyfus
Guardians of Childhood
Botox
Chase Utley
Prince Of Persia Sands Of Time
Cherokee
Christopher Lee
Prince Charles
Prince William
Prince Harry
Cleveland Browns
Ernie Accorsi
Reina Flynn
Reid Gray
Cole Hamels
Brett Myers
Quinn Gray
SEPTA
Burlington Northern
Star Wars The Old Republic
Nightmare On Elm Street
Gerard Butler
Amrit Dhaliwal
Louise Linton
Gwen Stefani
Curtis Lavelle Vance
Anne Pressly
H1N1 Vaccine
Melody Ross
Oasis Of The Seas
Disney Cruise
Selita Ebanks
Anthony Sowell
JJ Redick
Axe Body Spray
Christopher Walken
Dragon Age Origins
I agree. However, at least Buckley recognized that the current batch of Republicans were losers. Makes him smarter than most of the political pundits and talk radio hosts.
Concur. The fact that the torch is being passed to people like Michelle Malkin and John Derbyshire speaks volumes about the fall of conservatism.
I think I’ll save this entry to plagiarize on the death of Robert Byrd.
J.
Go for it. Better than being a phony about it and talking about how great someone is.
Just because a bigot is articulate doesn’t make me like him any better.
I disagree.
I personally DO think Buckley automatically became a better person by dying.
For some people that’s just the way it works.
Yeah, he regarded the war in Iraq as a mistake. That means that, to the right, he was a traitor who hated the troops and sided with al Qaeda.
Oliver,
The truth is, Buckley was a great man for at least two reasons. He actually debated and he was willing to change his position. I still have a signed copy of God and Man at Yale that I treasure highly.
It is o.k. to disagree with someone and still value their opinion because it is well-informed.
So you become a great man by being an insufferable racist but willing to listen to debate enough to tone down your racism to being merely sufferable?
I don’t get it. If you don’t like the guy, why post anything at all? What do you want? A pat on the back for “not being a phony?”
Jay, it’s in the same vein as his “Zombie Reagan” schtick. IOKIYAR — It’s OK If You’re Attacking Republicans.
Like I said, I think I’ll file this one away and save it for the days that Robert Byrd, Ted Kennedy, Jimmy Carter, and a few other lions of the left go to their Great Reward.
J.
Jay: I just don’t get the whitewash of history that happens when someone dies. I certainly didn’t feel the way about Buckley that I did about Falwell, that is I was and am glad that Falwell died. But it’s not as if I think Buckley had a good effect on the world.
Jay Tea: What the heck is your beef with Zombie Reagan? He’s a Zombie, he’s Ronald Reagan. He’s our undead 41st president! What’s not to like?
It’s truly amazing the way right-wingers think they’re scoring a “gotcha” point (in the invisible game they play with themselves, naturally- and boy, do them righties love to play with themselves) by responding to the death of a bad person by saying they’ll equally gloat when someone they personally think is “bad” dies as well.
I don’t jump up and down with praise for Byrd, but he’s spend the latter half of a century repudiating and expressing regret for his past. The National Review has done no such thing despite their entire founding being diatribes on the “dangers” of racial equality. A generation later, the torch is passed to Jonah Goldberg, who thinks Whole Foods is a communist organization and mocked black people for having the audacity to drown during a natural disaster. It’s hilariously ironic that of all people, Michelle Malkin would praise the life of Buckley- a man who died thinking her marriage (and procreation) to a white man was an abomination. So, seriously, the way-too-tired Robert Bryd card? Thank you, nice try, so sorry, maybe next time.
And seriously, the founder of a magazine who said AIDS patients should be tattooed and opposed racial integration is the moral equivalent of Jimmy Carter? If you truly believe that, Jay, then you’re simply a disgusting human being.
I think I’ll save this entry to plagiarize on the death of Robert Byrd.
Yeah, that Moonbat Robert Byrd and his stupid commie pinko constituents who keep re-electing him in WEST VIRGINIA.
August, stop it. Buckley has disavowed his pro-segregationist views and his tattoo idea (suggested in 1986 when most of the general public had no facts about AIDS) so get over it.
Oh wait. I forgot. Unless a person changes party affiliation, and becomes a Democrat, nothing they’ve ever said, whether it was 20 years ago or 50 years ago can ever be forgiven no matter how many times they disavow such statements.
You can be a leader in an organization that actually killed black people, you can vote against the Civil Rights Act (even filibuster it!), vote against the Voting Rights Act, say things like, “Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds” and be forgiven. No questions asked. Only as long as you are a DEMOCRAT.
It’s pretty pathetic thinking in my view. Pinning so much about a person on their party affiliation and political ideology.
And let me just add that I believe Robert Byrd when he says that is sorry for all of his past actions and statements.
My point is if that Byrd had switched parties, say in 1994 during the GOP takeover of Congress, he’d become enemy number one to Democrats and we’d immediately be reminded of his segregationist every time his name came up.
Oh wait. I forgot. Unless a person changes party affiliation, and becomes a Democrat, nothing they’ve ever said, whether it was 20 years ago or 50 years ago can ever be forgiven no matter how many times they disavow such statements….. No questions asked. Only as long as you are a DEMOCRAT.
Umm, no, you utter, utter, idiot. You can be forgiven- at least partially- when you spend fifty years trying to correct your mistakes by working toward progressive causes. You didn’t “forget,” you’re just retarded.
Has the National Review spun around and repudiated their opposition to civil rights? No. They continue to whine about Affirmative Action, continue to demand amending anti-gay bigotry into the constitution, and continue to mock poor black people for being poor and black.
My point is if that Byrd had switched parties, say in 1994 during the GOP takeover of Congress, he’d become enemy number one to Democrats and we’d immediately be reminded of his segregationist every time his name came up.
Oh my god, it’s a conspiracy! If Robert Byrd had joined the GOP in 1994, there might have been more emphasis that a former racist bigot belonged to the party that continues to work to oppose advances for gays, minorities, and foreigners! It’s almost as if it would have completely changed everything about him as a person and thus would have been viewed in a completely different light! And get this… if he became a Republican… Democrats would have opposed him! HOLY SHIT!
Seriously… are you retarded?
You can be forgiven- at least partially- when you spend fifty years trying to correct your mistakes by working toward progressive causes.
Thank you for proving my point. Forgiveness in any form can only be given just so long as you work “towards progressive causes.” Give me a freaking break.
They continue to whine about Affirmative Action
Only to the simplest of the simpletons does opposition to affirmative action equate to the opposition of civil rights.
continue to demand amending anti-gay bigotry into the constitution
Oh you mean like Robert Byrd? The guy who supposedly “works toward progressive causes”?
and continue to mock poor black people for being poor and black.
Now you’re just being an ass. Actually, MORE of an ass.
Forgiveness in any form can only be given just so long as you work “towards progressive causes.”
Because, you see, he was previously working against progressive causes. And now he’s correcting that. Hence, forgiveness.
I’m convinced now. You’re retarded.
Because, you see, he was previously working against progressive causes. And now he’s correcting that. Hence, forgiveness.
No shit jackass, but “progressive causes” is a subjective viewpoint. And considering Senator Byrd voted FOR a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, I guess he doesn’t fit within your little guidelines, does he?
I’m convinced now. You’re retarded.
If by ‘retarded’ you mean, “Somebody that doesn’t adhere to the idiotic notion of identity politics”, then yes, I guess I am.
“August, stop it. Buckley has disavowed his pro-segregationist views and his tattoo idea (suggested in 1986 when most of the general public had no facts about AIDS) so get over it.”
The AIDS virus was discovered in 1984. By 1986 the Surgeon General had already released guidelines on safe sex. Buckley was not speaking as a member of the general public chatting at the corner bar. He was an advocate with millions of followers pushing for a policy. One would hope he would feel the responsibility to educate himself somewhat before pontificating.
In any case, his tattoo idea was extreme regardless of the level of knowledge of the disease at the time. It would have been unprecedented and radical… his anti-gay bigotry is what persuaded him that it was suitable. Such measures were not considered during previous devastating epidemics, and would never have been tolerated.
The mere fact that years later with further medical information he realized that his extreme suggestion was not technically necessary does not excuse him of the bigotry required to have made it in the first place.
He was an advocate with millions of followers pushing for a policy.
He was not an advocate for a policy. What he mentioned, he wrote in one single column.
The mere fact that years later with further medical information he realized that his extreme suggestion was not technically necessary does not excuse him of the bigotry required to have made it in the first place.
Nobody said it “excuses him.” Harping on something now that he wrote about 20 years ago and later disavowed serves what purpose exactly?
Harping on something now that he wrote about 20 years ago and later disavowed when he learned that his good pal, former Joe McCarthy stooge Roy Cohn was dying of AIDS serves what purpose exactly?
I agree. Serves no purpose whatever.
Save your breath, Jay. I denounce and reject myself for even mentioning it.
Reagan is still a zombie.
“Jay, it’s in the same vein as his “Zombie Reagan” schtick …”
A quick question, Jay Tea. Evil, David Blaine-controlled Lincoln memorial monster. Too soon?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLoaDjWDKwg