<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Candidate AGAINST Hope And Aspiration?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/02/24/the-candidate-against-hope-and-aspiration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/02/24/the-candidate-against-hope-and-aspiration/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Enlightened Liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/02/24/the-candidate-against-hope-and-aspiration/#comment-56668</link>
		<dc:creator>Enlightened Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4087#comment-56668</guid>
		<description>So Tx liberal you would vote against Hillary in the general election?  Really?  That's the same strategery that gave us 8 years of Bush.  (See Nader, Ralph)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Tx liberal you would vote against Hillary in the general election?  Really?  That&#8217;s the same strategery that gave us 8 years of Bush.  (See Nader, Ralph)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tx Liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/02/24/the-candidate-against-hope-and-aspiration/#comment-56667</link>
		<dc:creator>Tx Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4087#comment-56667</guid>
		<description>Personally, in the long run it really doesn't matter a hell of a lot whether "queen hilliary" gets the nomination or not.  If she loses to Obama, all the better for the democratic party.  If she wins, I get to vote against her sorry ass twice!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, in the long run it really doesn&#8217;t matter a hell of a lot whether &#8220;queen hilliary&#8221; gets the nomination or not.  If she loses to Obama, all the better for the democratic party.  If she wins, I get to vote against her sorry ass twice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/02/24/the-candidate-against-hope-and-aspiration/#comment-56666</link>
		<dc:creator>duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4087#comment-56666</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The MSM wanted Hillary to get the nod, because she's the one they'd prepared for, just as the GOP wanted her to get the nod because they'd prepared for her.&lt;/i&gt;

If she doesn't, they have to redo all their on-screen graphics and get the yard signs all reprinted.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The MSM wanted Hillary to get the nod, because she&#8217;s the one they&#8217;d prepared for, just as the GOP wanted her to get the nod because they&#8217;d prepared for her.</i></p>
<p>If she doesn&#8217;t, they have to redo all their on-screen graphics and get the yard signs all reprinted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4tehlulz</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/02/24/the-candidate-against-hope-and-aspiration/#comment-56665</link>
		<dc:creator>4tehlulz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 05:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4087#comment-56665</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://obamamessiah.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;"... a light will shine through that window, a beam of light will come down upon you, you will experience an epiphany ... and you will suddenly realize that you must go to the polls and vote for Obama" - Barack Obama Lebanon, New Hampshire. January 7, 2008.&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href="http://www.kraftfoods.com/koolaid/" rel="nofollow"&gt;beverage&lt;/a&gt; * &lt;a href="http://flighttoguyana.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;transportation&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://obamamessiah.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">&#8220;&#8230; a light will shine through that window, a beam of light will come down upon you, you will experience an epiphany &#8230; and you will suddenly realize that you must go to the polls and vote for Obama&#8221; - Barack Obama Lebanon, New Hampshire. January 7, 2008.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.kraftfoods.com/koolaid/" rel="nofollow">beverage</a> * <a href="http://flighttoguyana.com/" rel="nofollow">transportation</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dasclemhaus</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/02/24/the-candidate-against-hope-and-aspiration/#comment-56664</link>
		<dc:creator>dasclemhaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 05:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4087#comment-56664</guid>
		<description>...and, to the extent that there is GOP encouragement to vote Obama, it's really just a psyche-out move.  Here's how it works:

1) GOP encourages partisans to vote Obama
2) GOP makes sure Dems hear about it
3) Dems think, "If the GOP wants Obama. they must be sure they can beat him"
4) Dems vote for Clinton
5) Which is what the GOP wanted all along, because they've had 16 years to prepare for her and know how to frame her negatively (and effectively)
6) McCain wins in November by 3 percentage points.

Happy, kangeroo?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and, to the extent that there is GOP encouragement to vote Obama, it&#8217;s really just a psyche-out move.  Here&#8217;s how it works:</p>
<p>1) GOP encourages partisans to vote Obama<br />
2) GOP makes sure Dems hear about it<br />
3) Dems think, &#8220;If the GOP wants Obama. they must be sure they can beat him&#8221;<br />
4) Dems vote for Clinton<br />
5) Which is what the GOP wanted all along, because they&#8217;ve had 16 years to prepare for her and know how to frame her negatively (and effectively)<br />
6) McCain wins in November by 3 percentage points.</p>
<p>Happy, kangeroo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrustyDem</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/02/24/the-candidate-against-hope-and-aspiration/#comment-56663</link>
		<dc:creator>CrustyDem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 05:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4087#comment-56663</guid>
		<description>The difference, kangeroo, is that Obama mocks Clinton mildly to make a clear point (usually that they consider something "too hard").  Clinton sounds as if she's mocking change, hope, and progress.  A better candidate could work an angle there (maybe Bill Clinton could manage it), but Hillary Clinton is tone deaf.

Do you have any evidence of the GOP "encouraging their troops to vote for obama in the open primaries", because many people are reporting exactly the opposite.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference, kangeroo, is that Obama mocks Clinton mildly to make a clear point (usually that they consider something &#8220;too hard&#8221;).  Clinton sounds as if she&#8217;s mocking change, hope, and progress.  A better candidate could work an angle there (maybe Bill Clinton could manage it), but Hillary Clinton is tone deaf.</p>
<p>Do you have any evidence of the GOP &#8220;encouraging their troops to vote for obama in the open primaries&#8221;, because many people are reporting exactly the opposite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kangeroo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/02/24/the-candidate-against-hope-and-aspiration/#comment-56662</link>
		<dc:creator>kangeroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 04:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4087#comment-56662</guid>
		<description>if you doubt the media's bias, check out these:
&lt;a href="http://www.cmpa.com/releases.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.cmpa.com/releases.html&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200801200003" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://mediamatters.org/items/200801200003&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/02/driving_a_wedge.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/02/driving_a_wedge.htm&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&#038;pageId=55807" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&#038;pageId=55807&lt;/a&gt;

and it was the media, not hillary, that incessantly pushed the inevitability theme.  i also think they did so deliberately in order to make tearing her down more dramatic (fun!):  &lt;a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/horsesmouth/2008/02/memo_to_media_f.php." rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/horsesmouth/2008/02/memo_to_media_f.php.&lt;/a&gt;

and if the GOP wanted hillary to get the nom, they wouldn't be encouraging their troops to vote for obama in the open primaries.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you doubt the media&#8217;s bias, check out these:<br />
<a href="http://www.cmpa.com/releases.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cmpa.com/releases.html</a><br />
<a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200801200003" rel="nofollow">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801200003</a><br />
<a href="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/02/driving_a_wedge.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/02/driving_a_wedge.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&#038;pageId=55807" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&#038;pageId=55807</a></p>
<p>and it was the media, not hillary, that incessantly pushed the inevitability theme.  i also think they did so deliberately in order to make tearing her down more dramatic (fun!):  <a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/horsesmouth/2008/02/memo_to_media_f.php." rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/horsesmouth/2008/02/memo_to_media_f.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/horsesmouth/2008/02/memo_to_media_f.php</a>.</p>
<p>and if the GOP wanted hillary to get the nom, they wouldn&#8217;t be encouraging their troops to vote for obama in the open primaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ignatz</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/02/24/the-candidate-against-hope-and-aspiration/#comment-56661</link>
		<dc:creator>ignatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 04:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4087#comment-56661</guid>
		<description>
How incredibly stupid,   It looks like she's responding to Obama's idealistic appeal in the worst manner possible: by claiming to be cynical and declaring it a virtue.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How incredibly stupid,   It looks like she&#8217;s responding to Obama&#8217;s idealistic appeal in the worst manner possible: by claiming to be cynical and declaring it a virtue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dasclemhaus</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/02/24/the-candidate-against-hope-and-aspiration/#comment-56660</link>
		<dc:creator>dasclemhaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4087#comment-56660</guid>
		<description>...the same mainstream media that built up the "inevitability" of the Clinton nomination, expecting a bruising match-up with McCain or Giuliani and ready to rehash every detail of the family Clinton's history.  Senator Clinton was the presumptive nominee; she was also presumptuous, with reason.  The MSM &lt;i&gt;wanted&lt;/i&gt; Hillary to get the nod, because she's the one they'd prepared for, just as the GOP wanted her to get the nod because &lt;i&gt;they'd&lt;/i&gt; prepared for her.

Do you actually believe that the MSM and GOP would summarily and arbitrarily  drop a script they've been writing for sixteen years?  It's in their best interests to marginalize Obama, not Hilary.  That they haven't been able to do that, that Clinton hasn't been able to do that, doesn't mean there's a conspiracy, it means they're being whomped by a superior politician.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;the same mainstream media that built up the &#8220;inevitability&#8221; of the Clinton nomination, expecting a bruising match-up with McCain or Giuliani and ready to rehash every detail of the family Clinton&#8217;s history.  Senator Clinton was the presumptive nominee; she was also presumptuous, with reason.  The MSM <i>wanted</i> Hillary to get the nod, because she&#8217;s the one they&#8217;d prepared for, just as the GOP wanted her to get the nod because <i>they&#8217;d</i> prepared for her.</p>
<p>Do you actually believe that the MSM and GOP would summarily and arbitrarily  drop a script they&#8217;ve been writing for sixteen years?  It&#8217;s in their best interests to marginalize Obama, not Hilary.  That they haven&#8217;t been able to do that, that Clinton hasn&#8217;t been able to do that, doesn&#8217;t mean there&#8217;s a conspiracy, it means they&#8217;re being whomped by a superior politician.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kangeroo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/02/24/the-candidate-against-hope-and-aspiration/#comment-56659</link>
		<dc:creator>kangeroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4087#comment-56659</guid>
		<description>obama's been mocking hillary and edwards in his rallies for a long time now; i bet you didn't care then.  besides, huffpobama is in the tank with the mainstream media.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>obama&#8217;s been mocking hillary and edwards in his rallies for a long time now; i bet you didn&#8217;t care then.  besides, huffpobama is in the tank with the mainstream media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: megamoze</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/02/24/the-candidate-against-hope-and-aspiration/#comment-56658</link>
		<dc:creator>megamoze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4087#comment-56658</guid>
		<description>The Audacity of Nope.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Audacity of Nope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: z_adura</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/02/24/the-candidate-against-hope-and-aspiration/#comment-56657</link>
		<dc:creator>z_adura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4087#comment-56657</guid>
		<description>Bill was indeed from Hope, Arkansas.  Hill is from Desperation, Illinois.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill was indeed from Hope, Arkansas.  Hill is from Desperation, Illinois.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
