Perversion Of Government: The Pentagon Vs. Barack Obama

1:50 pm EST February 23rd, 2008 | News | 4 Comments

Much like how the Bush administration manipulated the timing and quantity of terror alerts in 2004 to attack the Kerry campaign, they are now using the Pentagon and its spinners to attack Sen. Obama.

In January of next year we’re going to have to bring giant vats of Raid to get these people out of our government.

Topic:

Related Posts

«
»

4 Responses to “Perversion Of Government: The Pentagon Vs. Barack Obama”

  1. duros62 says:
    February 23, 2008 at 2:55 pm

    Shorter Pentagon spokesperson: Nuh-uh!

  2. midderpidge says:
    February 23, 2008 at 3:01 pm

    You know no one involved in the US government in any way shape or form is allowed to speak unless it’s been sanitized and approved by a Bush appointed or hired political PR person.

  3. C.S.Strowbridge says:
    February 23, 2008 at 4:21 pm

    Raid? How about the FBI? These people need to be investigates and thrown in jail as a warning for the next group who gets into power.

  4. Jay Tea says:
    February 24, 2008 at 7:15 am

    Obama clearly stated that active-duty soldiers in Afghanistan are having to capture and use weapons and ammunition from the enemy, as they have not been given adequate supplies from the US military.

    The consensus among milbloggers and others who have served over there are that that story is absolute bullshit, both in the accusation and in details. (Platoons are almost never split up and sent, piecemeal, to several different areas, for one; the question of how unarmed soldiers are to capture weapons from armed enemies is another.)

    The Pentagon was asked if the story was true. They said that it was highly unlikely, but without more specifics they couldn’t absolutely rule it out.

    The crux of the story seems to be that some Special Forces guys did take and use and adapt some enemy weapons, but that is one of the many things they do — but not out of absolute necessity. They do it because it deprives the enemy of a weapon, it gives them added capability that they don’t have to carry to the battle zone, and adds to the enemy’s confusion (the sounds and other physical evidence of the weapon — i.e., empty ammo casings — tend to indicate that it was not US forces, but nominally “friendly” forces attacking, sowing distrust in the enemy).

    There are regulations against regular units doing that. It causes more problems than it solves.

    So we have Obama citing one campaign aide who said he heard it from an unnamed source, and two network reporters saying yup, they were told the same thing.

    And when asked, the Pentagon says “that simply does not sound like anything we could imagine happening, but without specifics, we can’t say definitively that on such-and-such a date, the XXth Platoon did not take X AK-47 and XXX rounds of ammunition from the enemy and start using it in place of missing M-16s.”

    Yup, sounds like some grand conspiracy. After all, Obama, with his vast military experience, would never misstate (inadvertently or not) a story he heard third-hand from halfway around the world.

    J.