Comments on: No “There” To Rezko Accusations

By: Gravypan

Gravypan — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:41:05 +0000

Nope, nothing there are all.

Oliver, since you have your head buried so far up Obama’s ass, would you mind telling me what he had for dinner last night?

By: z_adura

z_adura — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:00:05 +0000

Well, I am sure there will be a full accounting of Obama’s financial dealings. I hope we can also have a full and truthful accounting of McCain’s dealings with Charles Keating. I think I would be more concerned to be McCain than Obama if ethical conduct becomes an issue.

By: duros62

duros62 — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:41:01 +0000

That’s all the proof you’ve ever needed to excuse your team, there, Farris. Whassamatter, it doesn’t apply in this case?

By: SaveFarris

SaveFarris — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:19:31 +0000

So nothing but the word of a collaborative party as filtered through the campaign constitutes “proof” in your eyes?

By: duros62

duros62 — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:08:31 +0000

Whitewater v2.0

Been there, done that.

But Dave, like Rex Mundane said the other day, it’s the difference between wanting to vote for Obama versus having to vote for Clinton.

By: Colorado Dave

Colorado Dave — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:24:47 +0000

We know the Republicans will throw everything possible at Obama to see if it sticks. We also know they will make stuff up if they have to.

Chicago politicians can be corrupt.

There is likely something in Obama’s history which will tarnish his image.

I will vote for Obama and canvass for him through thick and thin because I want a Democrat in the White House.

If Clinton gets the nomination I will vote for her and canvass for her because I want a Democrat in the White House.

I am old enough to not have unrealistic expectations of my politicians. If it is revealed that Obama did something sleazy early in his career in Chicago politics it will not change my support for him.

Can the same be said of his more idealistic and youthful supporters?