<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s Secret</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/02/13/obamas-secret/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/02/13/obamas-secret/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:43:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SpiderJ</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/02/13/obamas-secret/#comment-57168</link>
		<dc:creator>SpiderJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4191#comment-57168</guid>
		<description>Wow, you spent a lot of words to completely mischaracterize the Obama voters when you could just as easily have called us all wackjobs and showed as much substance.

I don&#039;t need President Obama to walk on water, raise the dead, or even turn America back into the world&#039;s shining beacon of light. I&#039;m aware that we&#039;ve had eight long years of fuckups that won&#039;t go away overnight, if they go away at all.

On the contrary to your &quot;Messiah&quot; meme, I have a very low bar set for whichever Democrat I condemn to the task of fixing the Bush regime&#039;s mistakes.

&quot;Don&#039;t spit on the Constitution. Don&#039;t sacrifice basic human decency in the same of security. Don&#039;t hire your buddies to do important jobs they&#039;re unqualified for. Don&#039;t commit our military to a half-baked strategy based on fully baked intelligence.&quot;

It&#039;s kind of like the way your body starts to heal itself within days after you stop smoking. All that&#039;s needed, at the start, is a cessation of behavior.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, you spent a lot of words to completely mischaracterize the Obama voters when you could just as easily have called us all wackjobs and showed as much substance.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t need President Obama to walk on water, raise the dead, or even turn America back into the world&#8217;s shining beacon of light. I&#8217;m aware that we&#8217;ve had eight long years of fuckups that won&#8217;t go away overnight, if they go away at all.</p>
<p>On the contrary to your &#8220;Messiah&#8221; meme, I have a very low bar set for whichever Democrat I condemn to the task of fixing the Bush regime&#8217;s mistakes.</p>
<p>&#8220;Don&#8217;t spit on the Constitution. Don&#8217;t sacrifice basic human decency in the same of security. Don&#8217;t hire your buddies to do important jobs they&#8217;re unqualified for. Don&#8217;t commit our military to a half-baked strategy based on fully baked intelligence.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s kind of like the way your body starts to heal itself within days after you stop smoking. All that&#8217;s needed, at the start, is a cessation of behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonswift.myopenid.com</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/02/13/obamas-secret/#comment-57167</link>
		<dc:creator>jonswift.myopenid.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4191#comment-57167</guid>
		<description>If voters are convinced that Obama is the messiah it will be difficult to beat him in the Fall. But what happens if Obama does not manage to walk on water or raise Ronald Reagan from the dead before they go to the polls in November?
&lt;a href=&quot;http://jonswift.blogspot.com/2008/02/barack-obamas-achilles-heel.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://jonswift.blogspot.com/2008/02/barack-obamas-achilles-heel.html&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If voters are convinced that Obama is the messiah it will be difficult to beat him in the Fall. But what happens if Obama does not manage to walk on water or raise Ronald Reagan from the dead before they go to the polls in November?<br />
<a href="http://jonswift.blogspot.com/2008/02/barack-obamas-achilles-heel.html" rel="nofollow">http://jonswift.blogspot.com/2008/02/barack-obamas-achilles-heel.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/02/13/obamas-secret/#comment-57166</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4191#comment-57166</guid>
		<description>Obama can flip Colorado...

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/colorado/colorado_2008_presidential_election&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/colorado/colorado_2008_presidential_election&lt;/a&gt;

Both come within the margin or error in Missouri...

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/missouri/missouri_2008_presidential_election&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/missouri/missouri_2008_presidential_election&lt;/a&gt;

(I would give Obama a slight edge over Hillary Clinton despite being down 1% more in the polls. He has a better shot at winning over undecideds.)

If he could take both, that could be enough to win.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama can flip Colorado&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/colorado/colorado_2008_presidential_election" rel="nofollow">http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/colorado/colorado_2008_presidential_election</a></p>
<p>Both come within the margin or error in Missouri&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/missouri/missouri_2008_presidential_election" rel="nofollow">http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/missouri/missouri_2008_presidential_election</a></p>
<p>(I would give Obama a slight edge over Hillary Clinton despite being down 1% more in the polls. He has a better shot at winning over undecideds.)</p>
<p>If he could take both, that could be enough to win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/02/13/obamas-secret/#comment-57165</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 01:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4191#comment-57165</guid>
		<description>&quot;Huh? I don&#039;t get it. I truly don&#039;t want another GWB in office. Yes, he did win on smoke and mirrors. Yes, that may be a winning strategy.&quot;

No. You win by appealing to people on an emotional level. That&#039;s all Bush had. Obama actually has substance as well. But unlike Kerry, he can also inspire people. You need both.

To recap...

All style and no substance = Bush
No style and all substance = Kerry
A good mix of both = Obama... as well as Clinton and Edwards.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Huh? I don&#8217;t get it. I truly don&#8217;t want another GWB in office. Yes, he did win on smoke and mirrors. Yes, that may be a winning strategy.&#8221;</p>
<p>No. You win by appealing to people on an emotional level. That&#8217;s all Bush had. Obama actually has substance as well. But unlike Kerry, he can also inspire people. You need both.</p>
<p>To recap&#8230;</p>
<p>All style and no substance = Bush<br />
No style and all substance = Kerry<br />
A good mix of both = Obama&#8230; as well as Clinton and Edwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/02/13/obamas-secret/#comment-57164</link>
		<dc:creator>jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4191#comment-57164</guid>
		<description>Huh?  I don&#039;t get it.  I truly don&#039;t want another GWB in office.  Yes, he did win on smoke and mirrors.  Yes, that may be a winning strategy.  But I&#039;ll pay attention to two Abraham Lincoln quotes.

You can fool all...

and

Better to remain silent...

Neither of the current candidates deserve my vote, and frankly, neither have done anything to show they respect my vote or have earned my vote.

And yes, I do place some blame for Harry Reid&#039;s abysmal behavior on their piss poor leadership as candidates.

There&#039;s a huge difference between running an overly wonky boring campaign and running a campaign based on Seinfeld, the show about nothing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh?  I don&#8217;t get it.  I truly don&#8217;t want another GWB in office.  Yes, he did win on smoke and mirrors.  Yes, that may be a winning strategy.  But I&#8217;ll pay attention to two Abraham Lincoln quotes.</p>
<p>You can fool all&#8230;</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>Better to remain silent&#8230;</p>
<p>Neither of the current candidates deserve my vote, and frankly, neither have done anything to show they respect my vote or have earned my vote.</p>
<p>And yes, I do place some blame for Harry Reid&#8217;s abysmal behavior on their piss poor leadership as candidates.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a huge difference between running an overly wonky boring campaign and running a campaign based on Seinfeld, the show about nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mingus</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/02/13/obamas-secret/#comment-57163</link>
		<dc:creator>mingus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4191#comment-57163</guid>
		<description>I can appreciate the thoughts and feeling in these articles.  My problem with Obama (full disclosure here, I voted for Edwards before he dropped out and am on the fence though slightly leaning towards Clinton at this point) is what exactly will he do as president? Ezra Klein expresses what I feel here:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/ezraklein_archive?month=02&amp;year=2008&amp;base_name=imagine_1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/ezraklein_archive?month=02&amp;year=2008&amp;base_name=imagine_1&lt;/a&gt;

At least with Clinton, you know what you&#039;re getting.  Which is not to say that I like all of that either.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can appreciate the thoughts and feeling in these articles.  My problem with Obama (full disclosure here, I voted for Edwards before he dropped out and am on the fence though slightly leaning towards Clinton at this point) is what exactly will he do as president? Ezra Klein expresses what I feel here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/ezraklein_archive?month=02&#038;year=2008&#038;base_name=imagine_1" rel="nofollow">http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/ezraklein_archive?month=02&#038;year=2008&#038;base_name=imagine_1</a></p>
<p>At least with Clinton, you know what you&#8217;re getting.  Which is not to say that I like all of that either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
