<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Edwards Exits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/01/30/edwards-exits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/01/30/edwards-exits/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:42:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Colorado Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/01/30/edwards-exits/#comment-57534</link>
		<dc:creator>Colorado Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 04:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4294#comment-57534</guid>
		<description>This Edwards supporter is undecided between Clinton and Obama although I am probably leaning more towards Obama.

I think they both have electability issues. Hillary will be a miracle for Republican Get Out the Vote efforts. That is a big problem.

On the plus side for Clinton she won&#039;t be sandbagged by the Republican smear machine. And she will dish it back at them in equal measures.

Obama has the name problem. Now, it is likely that anyone who will laugh at the Obama/Osama name rhyme or be concerned because his middle name is Husssein will not be voting for the Democratic candidate anyway. It still is out there. The phony madrassa story is still out there as well.

On the plus side Obama is in a position to change minds and sway voters. Pretty much everyone in the country already has an opinion about Clinton. Whether they view her favorably or unfavorably is already set in stone.

I think Obama is slightly more electable than Clinton so I will likely caucus for him although I am still neither sure nor enthusiastic.

Remember: We are all Democrats and it doesn&#039;t matter who is at the head of the ticket so long as we win in November. Obama is more conservative than Clinton who is more conservative than Edwards.

As president either Obama or Clinton will bring with them thousands of members of the Executive Branch. Most of the people employed by President Clinton or President Obama will be the same no matter who wins. Let just get a Democrat elected President while maintaining a Democratic majority in both houses.

This is going to be a close race and the map of the Electoral College doesn&#039;t look much more attractive to us than it did in November 2004. Let&#039;s just win in Ohio!


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Edwards supporter is undecided between Clinton and Obama although I am probably leaning more towards Obama.</p>
<p>I think they both have electability issues. Hillary will be a miracle for Republican Get Out the Vote efforts. That is a big problem.</p>
<p>On the plus side for Clinton she won&#8217;t be sandbagged by the Republican smear machine. And she will dish it back at them in equal measures.</p>
<p>Obama has the name problem. Now, it is likely that anyone who will laugh at the Obama/Osama name rhyme or be concerned because his middle name is Husssein will not be voting for the Democratic candidate anyway. It still is out there. The phony madrassa story is still out there as well.</p>
<p>On the plus side Obama is in a position to change minds and sway voters. Pretty much everyone in the country already has an opinion about Clinton. Whether they view her favorably or unfavorably is already set in stone.</p>
<p>I think Obama is slightly more electable than Clinton so I will likely caucus for him although I am still neither sure nor enthusiastic.</p>
<p>Remember: We are all Democrats and it doesn&#8217;t matter who is at the head of the ticket so long as we win in November. Obama is more conservative than Clinton who is more conservative than Edwards.</p>
<p>As president either Obama or Clinton will bring with them thousands of members of the Executive Branch. Most of the people employed by President Clinton or President Obama will be the same no matter who wins. Let just get a Democrat elected President while maintaining a Democratic majority in both houses.</p>
<p>This is going to be a close race and the map of the Electoral College doesn&#8217;t look much more attractive to us than it did in November 2004. Let&#8217;s just win in Ohio!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/01/30/edwards-exits/#comment-57533</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4294#comment-57533</guid>
		<description>Well, except I don&#039;t talk to any of those people. And I live in Maryland, not DC.

Very different.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, except I don&#8217;t talk to any of those people. And I live in Maryland, not DC.</p>
<p>Very different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew G. Saroff</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/01/30/edwards-exits/#comment-57532</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew G. Saroff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4294#comment-57532</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Edwards voters would seem to me to be more inclined to go with Obama than Clinton to the tune of 60-70 percent of them.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ummmm...no.

Your gut is wrong here.  The polling shows about 60% inclining towards Hillary.

Remember, you live in DC, where there are a lot of people in the Democratic party still hating on the Clintons, so &quot;Anti-Hillary&quot; is a bigger thing there.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>Edwards voters would seem to me to be more inclined to go with Obama than Clinton to the tune of 60-70 percent of them.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Ummmm&#8230;no.</p>
<p>Your gut is wrong here.  The polling shows about 60% inclining towards Hillary.</p>
<p>Remember, you live in DC, where there are a lot of people in the Democratic party still hating on the Clintons, so &#8220;Anti-Hillary&#8221; is a bigger thing there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdreamer</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/01/30/edwards-exits/#comment-57531</link>
		<dc:creator>tdreamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4294#comment-57531</guid>
		<description>Now that Edwards has &quot;suspended&quot; his campaign, I&#039;m officially a Hillary Clinton supporter.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that Edwards has &#8220;suspended&#8221; his campaign, I&#8217;m officially a Hillary Clinton supporter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buma</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/01/30/edwards-exits/#comment-57530</link>
		<dc:creator>buma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4294#comment-57530</guid>
		<description>I agree with OW. I would have voted for Edwards in the likely meaningless Pennsylvania primary, but now will vote for Obama.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with OW. I would have voted for Edwards in the likely meaningless Pennsylvania primary, but now will vote for Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nimrod Gently</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/01/30/edwards-exits/#comment-57529</link>
		<dc:creator>Nimrod Gently</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4294#comment-57529</guid>
		<description>Shame really, he might be a good president. In fact he should be vice-president right now.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame really, he might be a good president. In fact he should be vice-president right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benny</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/01/30/edwards-exits/#comment-57528</link>
		<dc:creator>Benny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4294#comment-57528</guid>
		<description>As an Edwards supporter, I can tell you many of us will still vote for him in the primaries and he is not likely to endorse anyone anytime soon.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an Edwards supporter, I can tell you many of us will still vote for him in the primaries and he is not likely to endorse anyone anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: midderpidge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/01/30/edwards-exits/#comment-57527</link>
		<dc:creator>midderpidge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4294#comment-57527</guid>
		<description>I think Edwards voters will slightly favor Clinton.  Health care voters will probably favor her and she doesn&#039;t try to evoke Ronald Reagan.  Woman voters that empathized with Elizabeth Edwards will probably go to Clinton.

Richardson is the endorsement to grab.  He could swing the Latino vote to either candidate with a word.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Edwards voters will slightly favor Clinton.  Health care voters will probably favor her and she doesn&#8217;t try to evoke Ronald Reagan.  Woman voters that empathized with Elizabeth Edwards will probably go to Clinton.</p>
<p>Richardson is the endorsement to grab.  He could swing the Latino vote to either candidate with a word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

