Who do you want to see take the lead role in setting policy for the country: George W. Bush or the Congress?

President George W. Bush: 21%
The Congress: 62%

http://www.pollingreport.com/congress.htm#misc

This only works if you are capable of debating. Claiming the housing bubble collapsing was the result of the minimum wage increase shows you are not. Debating you would weaken my skills.

And there’s the difference between you and me. I can take on your argument and insult you at the same time. You can not. You have no way of dealing with my argument, so you concentrate on the insults and the language. This is called the Style over Substance fallacy and it not logically invalid.

For the record, I don’t think any of the GOP echo chamber wonder why they get thrashed when they speak up. Caring would imply that they have some intention of letting the sun shine on their blacked hearts and might be open to evolving their world view to let a little reality and compassion seep in. No way you’re getting that from the 30% brigade.

I just wonder what pathological defect in their lonely lives makes them keep coming back.

As for Rumsfeld, he had a big hand in pushing toxic Aspartame to market and gave us the classic “go to war with the army you have” bit. He’s a natural. Hired!

Actually, it was “fuck off and come back when you can debate.” We dare not leave off the favored tool in your kit, the ubiquitous F-bomb.

Since foul language and insults are all you seem to understand, let me try this in your terms: if I told you to leave until you improve your name-calling skills, would you leave, you cock-sniffing, syphilitic pusbag?

Of course not.

Why then, should I pay any attention to what a drippy-dicked, leprous son of a South Bronx crackwhore like you has to say? It’s not as if a bucket of rancid horse piss like you could even conceive of the pathetically unoriginal thoughts that trigger every instance of sycophantic liberal goosestepping that the true owner of this site posts on a daily basis.

Keep in mind, you twisted piece of rotted roadside squirrel gut, that a lack of response on my part does not equate to a lack of ability to respond. Unlike today, it’s not often worth my time to engage a poorly trained intellectual vacuum such as yourself or the teeming half-dozens of bedwetting liberals surrounding you. All you can do if follow along like the shovelers behind the elephants at the circus parade, with your amens and agreements.

It is simply the fact that there will never, ever be a topic that the boundlessly diseased pile of vomit between your ears that passes for a brain will not twist to blame on a conservative which precludes any effort at wasting meaningful time on you.

I mean, why bother, after having seen how often you respond to real debate with silence (and its not hard to see why – it’s probably quite frightening for bile and venom fueled imbeciles like you to look at), and to satire and sarcasm and, frankly any position you can neither agree with nor understand (which comes to the same thing, really) with such witty rejoinders and “What the fuck? Is this a joke?” or “Fucking sub-human troglodyte,” or “are you trying to prove you are moke fucking retarded than Jay?”

The last of which I found especially ironic for a useless phlegm ball who complains when someone else misspells “omniscience.”

You do know what irony is, don’t you, you putrified sack of fish guts?

I suppose you could chalk it up to a typographical error, mistaking keys two inches apart. Cut that up with Occam’s Razor, though, and the simplest explanation is that you’re just an idiot.

So why would I spend the effort on this? Two simple reasons that a mental defective piece of whale shit like you may or may not understand:

1. By responding on your terms, at a level so far above your ordinary weasel world, you might appreciate that you’re not dealing with just any troll, but a better man, the soles of whose shoes you are unfit to climb a ladder to lick the mud from.

2. As Carl Sagan said when responding in detail to the obvious lunacy in Velikovsky’s WORLDS IN COLLISION thesis, doing so “sharpens the mind for useful work.” Today’s exercise in futility serves much the same purpose. I harbor no illusions that this was anything close to useful work, except as exercise. And perhaps a wake up call to a wretched and dismal name caller who needs to be sent to the minors to work on his game.

Why? Has Roger Ailes been falling down on the job?

All good Republican’ts know you just can’t have enough propaganda ministries. Especially when you have so much that needs catapulting…

Ha ha ha. That’s funny in a pathetic sort of way.

I told you to come back when you can debate, so you should probably leave again.

“And they wonder why we insult them.”

No we don’t… if logic escapes you, fall back on what you know.

And they wonder why we insult them.

Yes because when one hears about a propaganda ministry, they think immediately of a Berkley professor as opposed to, say, the Nazis or the Soviet Union.

Only a wingnut twit like SF could pull that one out of his stupid ass. I’m shocked you didn’t work the Soros cliche in there somehow.

Just another example of Bush et al’s complete inability to learn or consider anything different than what they already know. They seem to have this fixed group of people and can’t conceive of looking beyond that small circle.

Like the only tools you have are a hammer and screwdriver. When you need to tighten a bolt, don’t see if there is such a thing as a wrench. Just reach for your hammer, or screwdriver.

Or, just maybe, not invading them at the drop of a hat.

REUTERS
Reuters North American News Service

Jan 24, 2008 18:20 EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Paul Wolfowitz, an architect of the Iraq war who was forced to resign from the World Bank because of an ethics scandal, will chair a U.S. advisory panel on arms control, the State Department said on Thursday.

The former deputy secretary of defense and advocate of the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq will head the State Department’s International Security Advisory Board, which gives the department independent advice on arms control, disarmament, international security and other matters. (Editing by Todd Eastham)

***There is, apparently, nothing you can do to be truly fired once and for all from the Bush White House. Except tell the truth or resist using your station for partisan gain.***

Why? Has Roger Ailes been falling down on the job?