A Victory For Fakery

9:06 pm EST January 15th, 2008 | News | 10 Comments

Mitt Romney wins Michigan, and by Hugh Hewitt’s standard the entire GOP field should fall over and leave the field for the guy who lost two contests he should have won easily. I, on the other hand, hope for the fortunes of the most disingenuous candidate in U.S. electoral history.

UPDATE: I should also note again that Ron Paul again beat recent “frontrunners” Fred Thompson and Rudy Giuliani. Bwahahaha.

Topic:

Related Posts

«
»

10 Responses to “A Victory For Fakery”

  1. C.S.Strowbridge says:
    January 16, 2008 at 6:40 am

    This is perfect. Romney won and could get enough of a boost to win Nevada later this week. I can’t image this win will hurt him and he was already very competitive there. (Either ahead of behind McCain depending on the poll, but almost always within the margin of error.)

    He might not win in South Carolina, but McCain losing Michigan and Nevada could hurt him enough for Huckabee to win there. Florida could go to anyone, including Giuliani, and I don’t we will have a winner after February 5th.

  2. merl says:
    January 16, 2008 at 6:54 am

    How will McCain do in South Carolina? I wonder if they remember that he or his wife have a black baby?

  3. Sean D. Martin says:
    January 16, 2008 at 2:39 pm

    .

  4. Libertarian says:
    January 16, 2008 at 2:56 pm

    Ron Paul, one of the few in Congress, who actually stood up for the Constitution and against the Iraq war, while many democrats, including Billiary and Edwards voted for it. “Howdy Doody” Romney’s victory will be short lived as he is to fake to last even as a republican.

  5. Libertarian says:
    January 16, 2008 at 2:58 pm

    Ron Paul, one of the few in Congress, who actually stood up for the Constitution and against the Iraq war, while many democrats, including Billiary and Edwards voted for it. “Howdy Doody” Romney’s victory will be short lived as he is too fake to be elected even in the republican party.

  6. C.S.Strowbridge says:
    January 16, 2008 at 5:01 pm

    “How will McCain do in South Carolina? I wonder if they remember that he or his wife have a black baby?”

    No, the new smear his, ‘McCain’s was a Vietnam collaborator.’ I guess they figure if it works against Democrats, why not try it on a Republican.

  7. C.S.Strowbridge says:
    January 16, 2008 at 5:05 pm

    Libertarian said: “Ron Paul, one of the few in Congress, who actually stood up for the Constitution and against the Iraq war, while many democrats, including Billiary and Edwards voted for it. “Howdy Doody” Romney’s victory will be short lived as he is too fake to be elected even in the republican party.”

    Two points…

    1.) Ron Paul is a racist asshole whose economic views would return us to the Great Depression.

    2.) While Romney might not win the Republican nomination, he is certainly in an excellent position to do so, much more than Ron Paul.

  8. Libertarian says:
    January 16, 2008 at 7:00 pm

    1.) Ron Paul is a racist asshole whose economic views would return us to the Great Depression.

    1) You have absolutely no proof that Ron Paul is a racist. This is more smoke drubbed by the neocon political hacks who are currently in charge of the republican party, ie Karl Rove and his like. The only assholes are the current occupant of the Whitehouse and the woman who wants to replace him!

    2) While I agree that Howdy Doody will have a better chance of winning the republican nomination than Ron Paul, which has none, he is not going to get there. He is the only one I’ve ever seen that changes his position like most people change their underwear. He makes Kerry look like a rock!

  9. Libertarian says:
    January 16, 2008 at 7:14 pm

    1.) Ron Paul is a racist asshole whose economic views would return us to the Great Depression.

    1) Ron Paul a racist??? This is more smoke drubbed by the neocon political hacks who are currently in charge of the republican party, ie Karl Rove and his like. They pick statements totaly unrelated to race in something he has written and twist it into their own apparent racist thinking and put their thoughts out as coming from him. That statement is not fact but pure bullshit!

    2) While I agree that Romney will have a better chance of winning the republican nomination than Ron Paul, which has none, he is not going to get there. He is the only one I’ve ever seen that changes his position like most people change their underwear. He makes Kerry look like a rock!

    Just so you know the only reason I brought up Ron Paul is the fact that at least he had the sense to vote against Iraq, something that has turned out to be a disaster for foreign policy and had nothing to do with 9-11 or Al Queada. Whether you agree with him or not he was right on the Iraq War. If a few more democrats had the sense of Ron Paul, including some of those running for President, we may not have gotten into the mess we are in.

  10. C.S.Strowbridge says:
    January 17, 2008 at 9:14 am

    “1) Ron Paul a racist??? This is more smoke drubbed by the neocon political hacks who are currently in charge of the republican party, ie Karl Rove and his like. They pick statements totaly unrelated to race in something he has written and twist it into their own apparent racist thinking and put their thoughts out as coming from him. That statement is not fact but pure bullshit!”

    I’ve read the statements. They were completely racist and there was no twisting needed.