Comments on: Crying?

By: duros62

duros62 — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:29:18 +0000

Sargent Shriver on line one.

Sorry, meant to say Edmund Muskie.

This could be her Howard Dean moment, right here.

By: Quaker in a Basement

Quaker in a Basement — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 04:59:14 +0000

They posted the same thing over at RedState. We're through the looking glass here, folks. OW is posting the same anti-Clinton stuff as RedState.

By: Quaker in a Basement

Quaker in a Basement — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:37:04 +0000

Oh, stop being such a bunch of guys.

“Emotion!She showed emotion! Aieee!! Look away!! Must! Not! See! Emotion!!”

You know what? We’ve got a president right now who shows his emotions all the time: anger, arrogance, impatience, joviality (at the most inappropriate occasions), confusion, bitterness, and plenty of others.

A watery eye is not a disqualifier.

By: Benny

Benny — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:09:18 +0000

What’s worse is the MSM asked the other two what they thought about her emotional state. Neither one of them wanted to comment and said something else, and now Edwards is being blamed for being cold for not wanting to comment on this stupid thing.

It’s OK she’s human, but she needs to buck up. She’s not doing any women any favors or herself, for that matter.

By: tdreamer

tdreamer — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:09:27 +0000

Agree with with MG Saroff & Quaker, pretty much.

OW, you have a right not to support Hillary. But to pretend that, at worst, “using” emotion to sway voters is beyond the pale of politics… well, oh my gosh, you’re sounding like a golldarn Republican.

By: Quaker in a Basement

Quaker in a Basement — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 22:57:19 +0000

Yeah, yeah. It’s just Hillary being “calculating” again, right OW? Please let the cons circulate their own talking points.

By: Oliver Willis

Oliver Willis — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:52:51 +0000

I’m not being fair? Come on. Like I said, Sen. Clinton has used this image of her toughness – I like that image, but now she’s vulnerable all of a sudden? And that coincides with a downturn in her political fortunes? Come on.

By: Matthew G. Saroff

Matthew G. Saroff — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:45:52 +0000

Honestly, if there is a story that should be ignored this campaign season, this is it (so I won't be noting it on my blog). It means nothing, except, perhaps that she was tired, or she was reflecting on the 'Skins loss to Seattle, which bumming. You are not being fair to Hillary, and I can't believe that I said that.

By: tdreamer

tdreamer — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:43:55 +0000

Yeeha! Bash that pussy woman!

And vote for Barack Oblique!

Because we like the sound of his voice when he says he’ll be a uniter, not a divider…

Replace the fake cowboy with a fake preacher!

(The more things change, the more they stay the same.)

By: duros62

duros62 — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 19:55:34 +0000

Sargent Shriver on line one.