Iowa Data Point
Tweet
Barack Obama won the Iowa caucuses by 7.83%. In 2004, John Kerry won the caucuses by a smaller 5.8% margin and went on to win the Democratic nomination.
4 Responses to “Iowa Data Point”
GOP Rep. Spencer Bachus Facing House Ethics Probe For Insider Trading
Jennifer Aniston Reportedly Pregnant With Twins
PHOTOS: Tamara Ecclestone At The Langham Hotel
Red Front? “Center For American Freedom” Logo Echoes Communist Style
Romney Calls For Defunding Planned Parenthood, Wife Was A Donor
GOP Fundraising Email Asks Supporters To “Knock Out” Obama
Romney Comes Up Limp In Nevada
Obama Opens Lead On Romney In New Poll
Latest Entries
Why Do Liberals Support Drone Strikes?
Weekly Standard Rolls Out The Iraq Argument For Iran
Equal Polarization, My Ass
Some Crazy Stuff That Happened In World War II
Maryland Republican Campaign Funds Used To Defend Voter Suppression
The Obama Jobs Record In One Graph
Martin O’Malley All In For Marriage Equality
Newt Gingrich, Filled With More Excrement Than Your Average Politician
New Year, Powerline Still Stupid
Thanks Again
Meta
Blogroll
Disclaimer
The views on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

If the Kerry scenario holds (an Iowa win leads to a coronation march instead of a “true” primary), that would be the worst possible outcome for Obama, because it would lead to the same problem Kerry suffered from, namely the lack of experience with dealing with a formidable opponent.
Kerry had spent his whole career in Lib-friendly Massachusetts. And when Dean imploded and Edwards all but wore a nametag saying “Please pick me for Veep”, Kerry swept to the nomination having never learned to take a punch. A couple of Swift Boat and windsurfing ads later, Kerry didn’t know how to respond and his campaign was doomed.
Obama’s been flying under the radar what with Hillary’s sense of inevitability. Everyone’s been aiming their fire at her (save the “Is he a secretly a sleeper agent?” nonsense). If Obama wins NH and the Dem field go down without a fight, Obama STILL won’t have had a true electoral contest his entire career. Do Dems want to make a true rookie their standardbearer?
Of course, most of this will be irrelevant anyway. Hillary’s Terminator-esque qualities means she’s not going down without a no-holds-barred fight. Meaning Obama will have to earn it. If he survives the upcoming Clinton apocalypse, he deserves call himself an election “veteran”.
Well that’s the thing. Dems were in a rush in 2004 to pick someone to take down Bush, the decision to pick Kerry was based on people playing strategist and thinking which Dem would be most acceptable to red-staters. In 2008, so far, the fight seems to be more about what being a Dem is all about rather than playing strategist. Obama will have a fight, but he’ll also have people with his back.
I would really be worried if I was a Republican. Anyone remotely electable (McCain) isn’t palatable to the extreme right wing base. There is a real change that the Democratic nominee will win the general by a 60-40 margin.
Obama is the man, not only for his vision but because his victory will have coattails.
If the Kerry scenario holds (an Iowa win leads to a coronation march instead of a “true” primary), that would be the worst possible outcome for Obama, because it would lead to the same problem Kerry suffered from, namely the lack of experience with dealing with a formidable opponent.
I don’t think that’s so. Obama has shown himself to respond to critics swiftly and strongly. I don’t think he’s going to be Mr. Softee like Kerry.
Having said that, I also don’t put much stock in the statistical analysis of such things, like “If candidate A does this by this date in this state, then…”
Kinda like baseball stats in a way. “Player X got this many hits while wearing a garter belt under his uniform last year…”