Comments on: Surge To Hillary? http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/12/31/surge-to-hillary/ Like Kryptonite To Stupid Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:39:31 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Quaker in a Basement http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/12/31/surge-to-hillary/#comment-58475 Quaker in a Basement Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:01:11 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4447#comment-58475 Some people have suggested that the caucus voting system may hurt Clinton--I think just the opposite, and you've put your finger on the reason, OW. In caucus voting, a candidate has to garner a minimum percentage of voters present (15 percent, I think?) for the vote to count. If a candidate doesn't reach the threshold, his or her supporters align with another candidate or stand as unaffiliated. I think this is most likely to happen to Obama supporters in precints that are small, conservative, or with an older demographic. Unless those caucusers are prepared to hold out as unaffiliated, the so-called "safe" choice will get the benefit. Some people have suggested that the caucus voting system may hurt Clinton–I think just the opposite, and you’ve put your finger on the reason, OW.

In caucus voting, a candidate has to garner a minimum percentage of voters present (15 percent, I think?) for the vote to count. If a candidate doesn’t reach the threshold, his or her supporters align with another candidate or stand as unaffiliated.

I think this is most likely to happen to Obama supporters in precints that are small, conservative, or with an older demographic. Unless those caucusers are prepared to hold out as unaffiliated, the so-called “safe” choice will get the benefit.

]]> By: C.S.Strowbridge http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/12/31/surge-to-hillary/#comment-58474 C.S.Strowbridge Mon, 31 Dec 2007 08:19:02 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4447#comment-58474 I think the voting system, which you've described in terms similar to, 'a fucking catastrophe,' to low voter turnout will help Edwards win in Iowa. However, it will hurt Obama more than Clinton and she will come in second place. On the other hand, Huckabee would win in Iowa if the same system was used, but I think Romney will eek out a win. (Or at least come within 1-2%. McCain will crack 10% while the rest will embarrass themselves. Three days later in New Hampshire... Obama will sink enough to give Clinton a safe win making her the winner of the nomination while Romney will do the same for the Republicans. I think the voting system, which you’ve described in terms similar to, ‘a fucking catastrophe,’ to low voter turnout will help Edwards win in Iowa. However, it will hurt Obama more than Clinton and she will come in second place.

On the other hand, Huckabee would win in Iowa if the same system was used, but I think Romney will eek out a win. (Or at least come within 1-2%. McCain will crack 10% while the rest will embarrass themselves.

Three days later in New Hampshire…

Obama will sink enough to give Clinton a safe win making her the winner of the nomination while Romney will do the same for the Republicans.

]]>