Comments on: Obama And New Hampshire http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/12/11/obama-and-new-hampshire/ Like Kryptonite To Stupid Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:42:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 By: schmikka http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/12/11/obama-and-new-hampshire/#comment-58945 schmikka Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:42:53 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4559#comment-58945 It doesn't seem that Obama's response to Novak's column has hurt him at all. Sorry to say I told you so... <a href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/archives/2007/11/19/taking-the-bait/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://www.oliverwillis.com/archives/2007/11/19/taking-the-bait/#comments</a> It doesn’t seem that Obama’s response to Novak’s column has hurt him at all. Sorry to say I told you so…

http://www.oliverwillis.com/archives/2007/11/19/taking-the-bait/#comments

]]> By: Jay Tea http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/12/11/obama-and-new-hampshire/#comment-58944 Jay Tea Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:05:07 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4559#comment-58944 I think you mean "designated," not "designed." The prominence of the New Hampshire primary predates the Clintons' presidential aspirations by decades, and I don't recall a single candidate ever taking a stand for taking it away from us. "Designed" implies that Hillary had something to do with our going first, after the Iowa caucuses. J. I think you mean “designated,” not “designed.” The prominence of the New Hampshire primary predates the Clintons’ presidential aspirations by decades, and I don’t recall a single candidate ever taking a stand for taking it away from us. “Designed” implies that Hillary had something to do with our going first, after the Iowa caucuses.

J.

]]>