<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Audible Eyeroll, Michael Steele Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/11/29/audible-eyeroll-michael-steele-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/11/29/audible-eyeroll-michael-steele-edition/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:43:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/11/29/audible-eyeroll-michael-steele-edition/#comment-59225</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4633#comment-59225</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Any question asked or answered by Jay is a logical fallacy.&lt;/i&gt;

That makes no sense. But anyway...

&lt;i&gt;Michael Steele needs to deal with the fact that he can&#039;t win elections and let the adults bring Maryland into the future.&lt;/i&gt;

Again, this makes no sense. Whether or not Steele can or cannot win elections is irrelevant to whether or not his article is right.

&lt;i&gt;This is part of the RNC strategy in state&#039;s by the way. When they govern, they cut taxes and run huge deficits,&lt;/i&gt;

The only problem with your silly theory is that when Ehrlich and Steele came into office, they came in facing deficits and left leaving a surplus. The surplus numbers have been disputed by Democrats, but their dispute is rather weak.




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Any question asked or answered by Jay is a logical fallacy.</i></p>
<p>That makes no sense. But anyway&#8230;</p>
<p><i>Michael Steele needs to deal with the fact that he can&#8217;t win elections and let the adults bring Maryland into the future.</i></p>
<p>Again, this makes no sense. Whether or not Steele can or cannot win elections is irrelevant to whether or not his article is right.</p>
<p><i>This is part of the RNC strategy in state&#8217;s by the way. When they govern, they cut taxes and run huge deficits,</i></p>
<p>The only problem with your silly theory is that when Ehrlich and Steele came into office, they came in facing deficits and left leaving a surplus. The surplus numbers have been disputed by Democrats, but their dispute is rather weak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enlightened Liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/11/29/audible-eyeroll-michael-steele-edition/#comment-59224</link>
		<dc:creator>Enlightened Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4633#comment-59224</guid>
		<description>Any question asked or answered by Jay is a logical fallacy.  Michael Steele needs to deal with the fact that he can&#039;t win elections and let the adults bring Maryland into the future.

This is part of the RNC strategy in state&#039;s by the way.  When they govern, they cut taxes and run huge deficits, knowing that the Democrat will suffer when they take office and practice fiscal sanity by raising taxes and cutting services.  Then the Republican takes office in an anti-tax fervor and repeats the same cycle.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any question asked or answered by Jay is a logical fallacy.  Michael Steele needs to deal with the fact that he can&#8217;t win elections and let the adults bring Maryland into the future.</p>
<p>This is part of the RNC strategy in state&#8217;s by the way.  When they govern, they cut taxes and run huge deficits, knowing that the Democrat will suffer when they take office and practice fiscal sanity by raising taxes and cutting services.  Then the Republican takes office in an anti-tax fervor and repeats the same cycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/11/29/audible-eyeroll-michael-steele-edition/#comment-59223</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4633#comment-59223</guid>
		<description>Answering a question with a question is another logical fallacy.

Exactly what in Steele&#039;s article is BS? List the items. Instead of saying it&#039;s BS because he lost an election (that logic dictates that everything that comes out of John Kerry&#039;s mouth about the Bush administration is bullshit. After all, he lost in 2004), try explaining why the article is BS.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Answering a question with a question is another logical fallacy.</p>
<p>Exactly what in Steele&#8217;s article is BS? List the items. Instead of saying it&#8217;s BS because he lost an election (that logic dictates that everything that comes out of John Kerry&#8217;s mouth about the Bush administration is bullshit. After all, he lost in 2004), try explaining why the article is BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/11/29/audible-eyeroll-michael-steele-edition/#comment-59222</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4633#comment-59222</guid>
		<description>Is it possible you could ever acknowledge conservative b.s.?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible you could ever acknowledge conservative b.s.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/11/29/audible-eyeroll-michael-steele-edition/#comment-59221</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=4633#comment-59221</guid>
		<description>Oliver, is there a chance that you could possibly criticize something without resorting to logical fallacies?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver, is there a chance that you could possibly criticize something without resorting to logical fallacies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
