Besides which, the study found the top two candidates in favorable coverage were Obama and Thompson, arguably the two most lacking in credentials. Which lines up with other conclusions that show that coverage seems to focus more on political and tactical coverage (63%) rather than ideas and policy(15%) and candidate’s records (1%!!!).

Meanwhile the two parties’ frontrunners received nearly identical coverage with Guilliani (27.8/37) getting a slight edge in positive/negative coverage over Clinton (26.8/37.8)

If Obama and McCain are taken out of the equation, the two party candidate coverage is nearly identical in tone (positive%/negative%).

Newspapers were the most positive toward Democrats and focused more stories on how policy and ideas affect citizens than TV or Radio.

Polling indicates Americans want more coverage on candidate’s positions on issues. Which would lead to more positive coverage for Democrats.

Gonna call him a liberal elitist next?

Perhaps you can whip out a “shut the fuck” up on them, see how well it works as a form of argument.

Now get back outside, I see one of the pink flamingos in front of your double-wide trailer has blown over…..

Shut the fuck you, you ignorant loser. Is this a contest for you? Are you trying to be wrong as many times as possible in has short a time as possible?

You have less than zero credibility. Everything you say becomes less true by you saying it.

And don’t complain about my language; I am treating you with far more respect that you deserve.

That would be shocking….if it happened.