John Edwards NOT Booed At Mellencamp Concert

1:23 pm EST November 11th, 2007 | Media | 7 Comments

You mean the media lied about a Democrat again? Shocker.

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
«
»

7 Responses to “John Edwards NOT Booed At Mellencamp Concert”

  1. C.S.Strowbridge says:
    November 11, 2007 at 1:49 pm

    These people need to be fired.

  2. fredfarkle says:
    November 11, 2007 at 1:55 pm

    you mean the liberally biased media (according to the liberal think-tank Shorenstein center0?

    That would be shocking….if it happened.

  3. Josh Medeiros says:
    November 11, 2007 at 1:57 pm

    Pretty amazing, heck of a lot more cheering.

  4. C.S.Strowbridge says:
    November 11, 2007 at 4:32 pm

    fredfarkle: “you mean the liberally biased media”

    Shut the fuck you, you ignorant loser. Is this a contest for you? Are you trying to be wrong as many times as possible in has short a time as possible?

    You have less than zero credibility. Everything you say becomes less true by you saying it.

    And don’t complain about my language; I am treating you with far more respect that you deserve.

  5. fredfarkle says:
    November 11, 2007 at 11:29 pm

    How about the shorenstein center CS? How is their credibility? Was I lying that they found clear liberal bias in the media?

    Perhaps you can whip out a “shut the fuck” up on them, see how well it works as a form of argument.

    Now get back outside, I see one of the pink flamingos in front of your double-wide trailer has blown over…..

  6. Dr. Squid says:
    November 12, 2007 at 12:33 am

    Now get back outside, I see one of the pink flamingos in front of your double-wide trailer has blown over…..

    Gonna call him a liberal elitist next?

  7. midderpidge says:
    November 12, 2007 at 12:45 am

    Piffle. Apparently conservatives take a single study on coverage for different candidates and try to apply it broadly.

    Besides which, the study found the top two candidates in favorable coverage were Obama and Thompson, arguably the two most lacking in credentials. Which lines up with other conclusions that show that coverage seems to focus more on political and tactical coverage (63%) rather than ideas and policy(15%) and candidate’s records (1%!!!).

    Meanwhile the two parties’ frontrunners received nearly identical coverage with Guilliani (27.8/37) getting a slight edge in positive/negative coverage over Clinton (26.8/37.8)

    If Obama and McCain are taken out of the equation, the two party candidate coverage is nearly identical in tone (positive%/negative%).

    Newspapers were the most positive toward Democrats and focused more stories on how policy and ideas affect citizens than TV or Radio.

    Polling indicates Americans want more coverage on candidate’s positions on issues. Which would lead to more positive coverage for Democrats.