First of all, Romney is leading in Iowa, New Hampshire, and other states, particularly the first two being very important primary states.”

Against Republicans he is leading, but in the general election match-ups, he performs poorly, more so than the other top names on the Republican field.

I have no doubt he would make up some of the ground, but he has less chance of winning the White House than McCain, Giuliani, or Thompson.

“No one is as polarizing as Hillary. 50% of people polled say they absolutely positively will not vote for her.”

Don’t trust that poll. The questions given by Zogby were leading, which is part of a pattern for them.

In fact, most similar polls done by other companies show Clinton has the best net popularity. (The number of people who will definitely vote for her – the number of people who will definitely vote against her.)

“Besides, she has no experience and she’s a two faced cyborg. Everyone knows that.”

Everyone, or are you just projecting? Number indicate the latter is more likely.

You said in areas where he is well known, “Iowa, Mass, etc”

First of all, Romney is leading in Iowa, New Hampshire, and other states, particularly the first two being very important primary states.

Secondly, Mass is 80+% Democrat voters so even though he was governor, chances of him carrying the state are slim.

No one is as polarizing as Hillary. 50% of people polled say they absolutely positively will not vote for her.

Besides, she has no experience and she’s a two faced cyborg. Everyone knows that.

Romney previously held some positions, but now, in some areas, holds different positions.

Hillary holds all possible positions at the same time, depending on who she is talking to and what they want to hear.

If anyone questions Hillary’s ability to get America back on track, then I will question their sanity. You can count on it.

Also, Clinton will be able to hammer him on ‘flip-flopping’ and that will give an excuse for evangelical Christians to dump him over his Mormonism.