Privatized Science
Tweet
Bad news for innovation.
“The biggest threat to science,” writes Jennifer Washburn, is “the decline of government support … and the growing dominance of private spending over American research.” In 1965, the U.S. government funded more than 60 percent of research, while in 2006, 65 percent of research was privately funded. Even some industry leaders are concerned that basic research, which “drives innovation 10 to 15 years out,” is being shortchanged in favor of applied research focused on marketable products. Multiple analyses have shown “that the effect of industry funding on the research outcome is huge” — a particularly troubling phenomenon for medical research.
4 Responses to “Privatized Science”
GOP Rep. Spencer Bachus Facing House Ethics Probe For Insider Trading
Jennifer Aniston Reportedly Pregnant With Twins
PHOTOS: Tamara Ecclestone At The Langham Hotel
Red Front? “Center For American Freedom” Logo Echoes Communist Style
Romney Calls For Defunding Planned Parenthood, Wife Was A Donor
GOP Fundraising Email Asks Supporters To “Knock Out” Obama
Romney Comes Up Limp In Nevada
Obama Opens Lead On Romney In New Poll
Latest Entries
Why Do Liberals Support Drone Strikes?
Weekly Standard Rolls Out The Iraq Argument For Iran
Equal Polarization, My Ass
Some Crazy Stuff That Happened In World War II
Maryland Republican Campaign Funds Used To Defend Voter Suppression
The Obama Jobs Record In One Graph
Martin O’Malley All In For Marriage Equality
Newt Gingrich, Filled With More Excrement Than Your Average Politician
New Year, Powerline Still Stupid
Thanks Again
Meta
Blogroll
Disclaimer
The views on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

“The biggest threat to science,” writes Jennifer Washburn, is “the decline of government support … and the growing dominance of private spending over American research.” In 1965, the U.S. government funded more than 60 percent of research, while in 2006, 65 percent of research was privately funded. Even some industry leaders are concerned that basic research, which “drives innovation 10 to 15 years out,” is being shortchanged in favor of applied research focused on marketable products. Multiple analyses have shown “that the effect of industry funding on the research outcome is huge” — a particularly troubling phenomenon for medical research.
We saw this at the beginning of Mike Judge’s “Idiocracy.” All the best minds will go into ED and hair loss.
But it has electrolytes!
This argument supposes that government’s stake in scientific research is “neutral,” which is simply foolish thinking.
If no one wants to privately fund a specific area of scientific research, the most probabal reason is that it is not worth doing, at least as we understand things now.
“probable”