Some Famous Women Who I Don’t Think Are Attractive

8:47 pm EST October 13th, 2007 | News | 11 Comments

On the flip side, Kim Kardashian has no discernible skills, but…

kim kardashian

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
«
»

11 Responses to “Some Famous Women Who I Don’t Think Are Attractive”

  1. Robster says:
    October 13, 2007 at 8:54 pm

    Don’t forget Paris Hilton. That bobble head noggin of hers creeps me out.

  2. jerry says:
    October 13, 2007 at 8:56 pm

    Wrong,
    Wrong,
    Wrong,
    Wrong,
    Right.

  3. Roundhead says:
    October 13, 2007 at 9:04 pm

    With you on all of them, except Ms. Barrymore. And I would put her in the “cute” category, but not “beautiful”

  4. Diamond LeGrande says:
    October 13, 2007 at 11:20 pm

    Roberts is fugly. And anyone who says otherwise is wrong. She’s always been fugly, and folks have finally admitted to this now that she is aging badly. And she’s a crappy actress. (I don’t like her. Can you tell?)
    Barrymore actually looks better now that she’s over 30. I didn’t think much of her when she was 20 myself, but is much better nowadays.
    Lohan is pretty. She’s the definition of high-maintenence, but definitely pretty.
    Liu is attractive, but has a stick-figure body. Same story with Charlize Theron. Both are cute, but not hot.
    Anderson became nasty around the time of boob job number three. While buying a bust bigger than all of Dolly Parton makes her look silly, the whorish makeup job makes her look, well, whorish.

  5. Repack Rider says:
    October 13, 2007 at 11:42 pm

    Sorry, but Charlize Theron is one of my faves. Concur on the rest. Been thinking that about Julia Roberts ever since the vomit-inducing “Pretty Woman.”

    Worst. Movie. Since. “Plan Nine from Outer Space,” which actually had a more plausible plot.

  6. MissLaura says:
    October 14, 2007 at 2:43 am

    Ew. Kim Kardashian? That’s appalling.

  7. James E. Powell says:
    October 14, 2007 at 12:26 pm

    I used to work in Century City and Beverly Hills. It was not unusual to see actors walking around, shopping, in line at Starbucks, and the like.

    What was striking was how ordinary most of them looked. The “Beautiful Women” are above average, no more than that. You can see women who are equally beautiful and even more beautiful on any Saturday at the Santa Monica Promenade. Make-up, lighting, agents who keep unflattering photos out of the media and audience credulity combine to create the illusion that the women who are “products” of the entertainment corporations are, in some way, more beautiful than the women in our lives.

    I guess this serves some human need or it wouldn’t be this way.

  8. Gyuss Baaltar says:
    October 14, 2007 at 3:38 pm

    I do hate getting on that Kardashian bandwagon, but dammmmn!

    And anyone else pissed at Santana Moss right now?

  9. jack says:
    October 15, 2007 at 1:01 am

    Kim Kardashian?

    When you’re idea of a beautiful woman is a blow up doll you really need to get laid.

  10. merlallen says:
    October 15, 2007 at 5:04 am

    I saw some nudes of Pam Anderson pre-surgery and she was pretty damn hot.
    After the surgery and the dye job, not so much.

  11. MissLaura says:
    October 15, 2007 at 6:10 pm

    Extremely famous women I’ve seen very close up (though in full makeup etc):

    Renee Zellweger – I’ve seen prettier women walking down the street.
    Catherine Zeta-Jones – beautiful, but not surprisingly so
    Nicole Kidman – see Catherine Zeta-Jones
    Angelina Jolie – apparently there’s just a limit to how much beauty can be reflected in a photo, and she exceeds it, because in person she was way beyond what I even thought possible