WSJ Vs. Odub

5:17 pm EST October 11th, 2007 | News | 7 Comments

The Wall Street Journal went after me today for what I admit was a factual inaccuracy in my entry about Thurgood Marshall and Clarence Thomas (I said Marshall was not alive, but he was during the hearings – but I’m sure he’s rolling in his grave as to how bad a justice Thomas turned out to be), but they also say my rant was “racist”. When the Wall Street journal calls you “racist”, you can’t help but to be on the side of angels.

As long as they spell your name right, I say.

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
«
»

7 Responses to “WSJ Vs. Odub”

  1. Enlightened Liberal says:
    October 11, 2007 at 6:17 pm

    Ollie, you made a mistake on a minor point from 16 years ago, therefore everything that you have ever said in your life is wrong. Of course, if you were a Republican you could make mistakes all the time and Republicans would call anyone that points them out traitors and unpatriotic.

  2. Oliver Willis says:
    October 11, 2007 at 6:21 pm

    Just six more months, I always say.

  3. Enlightened Liberal says:
    October 11, 2007 at 6:26 pm

    You mean 1 Freedman unit.

  4. OxyCon says:
    October 11, 2007 at 6:35 pm

    Taranto is a joke. Google his name to see how many times he’s ever been right about anything (it ain’t much).
    He’s just one of Murdoch’s little toadies now.

  5. Oliver Willis says:
    October 11, 2007 at 6:40 pm

    I’m familiar with Taranto’s work and his eating habits (I ate lunch with him at the table once). Neither is pretty.

  6. Anti-Murdoch says:
    October 11, 2007 at 7:00 pm

    Yes, Oliver, it’s obvious you want to bring back Jim Crow, segregation, etc. You scummy racist you!

  7. Quaker in a Basement says:
    October 11, 2007 at 7:46 pm

    OW, I never took you for the self-loathing Uncle Ruckus type of black man. You probably watch bass fishing on TV too.