<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If Any Democratic Campaign Was As Dumb As Rudy Giuliani&#8217;s This Is What Their Electoral Map Would Look Like</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/10/03/if-any-democratic-campaign-was-as-dumb-as-rudy-giulianis-this-is-what-their-electoral-map-would-look-like/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/10/03/if-any-democratic-campaign-was-as-dumb-as-rudy-giulianis-this-is-what-their-electoral-map-would-look-like/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/10/03/if-any-democratic-campaign-was-as-dumb-as-rudy-giulianis-this-is-what-their-electoral-map-would-look-like/#comment-61424</link>
		<dc:creator>duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5082#comment-61424</guid>
		<description>So, what, you&#039;re the Movie Fone guy? =)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what, you&#8217;re the Movie Fone guy? =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/10/03/if-any-democratic-campaign-was-as-dumb-as-rudy-giulianis-this-is-what-their-electoral-map-would-look-like/#comment-61423</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 16:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5082#comment-61423</guid>
		<description>Quick update...

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/28467/edwards_is_top_presidential_contender_in_missouri&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/28467/edwards_is_top_presidential_contender_in_missouri&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/28467/edwards_is_top_presidential_contender_in_missouri&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

New poll shows Giuliani retook his lead in Missouri, but it is still within the margin of error.

With a Clinton vs. Giuliani contest I would place the 8 states like this...

Clinton: Oregon, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire

Giuliani: Missouri, Nevada

Mixed: Ohio, Florida
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick update&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/28467/edwards_is_top_presidential_contender_in_missouri" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/28467/edwards_is_top_presidential_contender_in_missouri" rel="nofollow">http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/28467/edwards_is_top_presidential_contender_in_missouri</a></p>
<p>New poll shows Giuliani retook his lead in Missouri, but it is still within the margin of error.</p>
<p>With a Clinton vs. Giuliani contest I would place the 8 states like this&#8230;</p>
<p>Clinton: Oregon, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire</p>
<p>Giuliani: Missouri, Nevada</p>
<p>Mixed: Ohio, Florida</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/10/03/if-any-democratic-campaign-was-as-dumb-as-rudy-giulianis-this-is-what-their-electoral-map-would-look-like/#comment-61422</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 22:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5082#comment-61422</guid>
		<description>&quot;Just curious, Stowbridge; Do you do this stuff for aliving? You always seem to have the pulse of the latest polls.&quot;

I actually do box office analysis for a living, but politics is the same game. I&#039;m addicted to numbers and love analyzing trends, (which is why I had a better than 90% accuracy last weekend at the box office but I haven&#039;t been invited to a party in decades).

When it comes to numbers, nothing generates more statistics than politics.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Just curious, Stowbridge; Do you do this stuff for aliving? You always seem to have the pulse of the latest polls.&#8221;</p>
<p>I actually do box office analysis for a living, but politics is the same game. I&#8217;m addicted to numbers and love analyzing trends, (which is why I had a better than 90% accuracy last weekend at the box office but I haven&#8217;t been invited to a party in decades).</p>
<p>When it comes to numbers, nothing generates more statistics than politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/10/03/if-any-democratic-campaign-was-as-dumb-as-rudy-giulianis-this-is-what-their-electoral-map-would-look-like/#comment-61421</link>
		<dc:creator>duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 21:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5082#comment-61421</guid>
		<description>Just curious, Stowbridge; Do you do this stuff for aliving? You always seem to have the pulse of the latest polls.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious, Stowbridge; Do you do this stuff for aliving? You always seem to have the pulse of the latest polls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/10/03/if-any-democratic-campaign-was-as-dumb-as-rudy-giulianis-this-is-what-their-electoral-map-would-look-like/#comment-61420</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5082#comment-61420</guid>
		<description>I would also like to point out that before Bloomberg decided against running for president, Clinton was winning in Texas in a three-way race between here, Bloomberg and Romney. So the Democrats winning in Texas isn&#039;t as bizarre as one might think.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would also like to point out that before Bloomberg decided against running for president, Clinton was winning in Texas in a three-way race between here, Bloomberg and Romney. So the Democrats winning in Texas isn&#8217;t as bizarre as one might think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/10/03/if-any-democratic-campaign-was-as-dumb-as-rudy-giulianis-this-is-what-their-electoral-map-would-look-like/#comment-61419</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5082#comment-61419</guid>
		<description>Damn it! An error ate my post. Arg.

Here it is again...

Open Left&#039;s map has Nevada as a safe Republican state, however, while the last poll I&#039;ve seen from the state had Giuliani up by 8 points, that was from March. Nationally, there has been a 8% - 10% swing in Clinton&#039;s favor since then.

Here are my list of swing states...

Oregon: McCain actually leads here, but Clinton leads the rest.

Nevada: Not enough polling to know for sure, but Clinton should be competitive.

Missouri: Polls are giving mixed messages here, but Clinton should have a slight, slight advantage.

Tennessee: Thompson would win his home state easily, but the Clinton can beat the rest by varying margins

Ohio: I&#039;ve seen polls that have Giuliani ahead by the narrowest of margins, but others have Clinton ahead by more than the margin of error

Florida: See Ohio

Pennsylvania: Clinton has an advantage here, but it will be close enough for the Republicans to spend big bucks here.

New Hampshire: Romney actually leads Clinton here, but I think that has a lot to do with the sheer amount of money he&#039;s spent trying to win the primary here.

(On a side note, I don&#039;t have New Jersey as a swing state. I think the polls will be close enough to encourage the Republicans to spend $10 million here, but they will still lose by 7%.)

There is a small chance that Clinton could sweep all 8 states earning 106 EC votes, and she would only need 19 to win it all. This is nearly Identical to the Open Left Map, with just a handful of states differing. (I while look into Washington State to see if it is truly up for play.)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn it! An error ate my post. Arg.</p>
<p>Here it is again&#8230;</p>
<p>Open Left&#8217;s map has Nevada as a safe Republican state, however, while the last poll I&#8217;ve seen from the state had Giuliani up by 8 points, that was from March. Nationally, there has been a 8% &#8211; 10% swing in Clinton&#8217;s favor since then.</p>
<p>Here are my list of swing states&#8230;</p>
<p>Oregon: McCain actually leads here, but Clinton leads the rest.</p>
<p>Nevada: Not enough polling to know for sure, but Clinton should be competitive.</p>
<p>Missouri: Polls are giving mixed messages here, but Clinton should have a slight, slight advantage.</p>
<p>Tennessee: Thompson would win his home state easily, but the Clinton can beat the rest by varying margins</p>
<p>Ohio: I&#8217;ve seen polls that have Giuliani ahead by the narrowest of margins, but others have Clinton ahead by more than the margin of error</p>
<p>Florida: See Ohio</p>
<p>Pennsylvania: Clinton has an advantage here, but it will be close enough for the Republicans to spend big bucks here.</p>
<p>New Hampshire: Romney actually leads Clinton here, but I think that has a lot to do with the sheer amount of money he&#8217;s spent trying to win the primary here.</p>
<p>(On a side note, I don&#8217;t have New Jersey as a swing state. I think the polls will be close enough to encourage the Republicans to spend $10 million here, but they will still lose by 7%.)</p>
<p>There is a small chance that Clinton could sweep all 8 states earning 106 EC votes, and she would only need 19 to win it all. This is nearly Identical to the Open Left Map, with just a handful of states differing. (I while look into Washington State to see if it is truly up for play.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diamond LeGrande</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/10/03/if-any-democratic-campaign-was-as-dumb-as-rudy-giulianis-this-is-what-their-electoral-map-would-look-like/#comment-61418</link>
		<dc:creator>Diamond LeGrande</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 12:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5082#comment-61418</guid>
		<description>&quot;Best able to beat Clinton&quot; reminds me of John Kerry&#039;s pitch in 2004, &quot;Best able to beat Bush.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Best able to beat Clinton&#8221; reminds me of John Kerry&#8217;s pitch in 2004, &#8220;Best able to beat Bush.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

