Policy-wise this is horrible. From a political POV? Thanks Bush.
» Breaking News
Bill Clinton Refuses Hillary’s Senate Seat
Dylan Ryder [Breaking Beauty]
Eva Mendes Promotes The Spirit In Spain
Nadia Styles [Breaking Beauty]
Ex-AOL CEO Jonathan Miller Plots Yahoo Takeover
Bush Vetoes Health Insurance for 24 Year Olds whose parents make $65K
fixed!
Bush Vetoes Health Care for Millions of Poor Kids because 30,000 24 year olds whose parents make $65k might get it too.
Fixed!
How much for Iraq?
How little for health care?
Please defend this SOB, wingnuts.
Ooh, ooh, let me try, Joe!
It isn’t about teh monies, it’s the principle. First it’s healthcare for poor kids and the next thing you know, it’s socialism.
ScHIP is just a gateway drug (HA, irony much?) for national health care. And we can’t have that. Bad for business.
Insurance business, that is.
Now I just need someone to tell why Socialism is a bad thing again.
“Bush Vetoes Health Insurance for 24 Year Olds whose parents make $65K”
Wow. A lie. From SaveFarris. What a surprise.
Because Socialism is Communism, pinko scum. And all Commies are EEEEEEEEEEvil. All of them. It’s part of their genetic makeup. And their steady diet of kittens.
“Bush Vetoes Health Insurance for a minority of those qualified who are 24 Year Olds whose parents make $65K and screws the vast majority of qualified applicants whose parents don’t make that much“
Fixed it for you…
Plus: How many 24 year olds are still supported by their parents? Besides rich Republican’t entitlement children who have never had to work a day in their lives?
Donations donations donations. Nothing works fine than that.I am requesting all the rich people to help all the kids poor,hungry people for that.Specially in education and health field.
So I’m hearing this right. Bush thinks that health care for sick kids is some evil form of socialism, yet he wants to bail out the corporate giants on Wall Street with taxpayers’ money - the same corporate giants who preach the virtues of a free market in good economic times (and don’t offer to share their profits!), and then want the average joe to ’share’ the burden of their debts during bad times. You can’t burn both sides of the candle. But of course, that’s not socialism!