Comments on: James Dobson Vetoes The Thompson Nomination

By: durablend

durablend — Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:39:01 +0000

Me thinks Dobson himself may need to run since I don’t see anyone passing the fruitcake smell test.

Hope he enjoys the taste of Mop N Glow

By: daniel rotter

daniel rotter — Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:18:37 +0000

So according to Dobson, Thompson opposing the Federal Marriage Amendment to the Constitution=Thompson believing there should be 50 different definitions of marriage in the U.S. I’ll take ridiculous and bizarre conclusions for $100, Alex.

By: Quaker in a Basement

Quaker in a Basement — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 19:31:18 +0000

Dobson support Keyes?

I think there must be a line from Blazing Saddles that fits here.

By: SpiderJ

SpiderJ — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:18:39 +0000

I mean the voting bloc–that right now, Brownback may be the only candidate that Dobson and Co. can trust to keep our nation right with Jee-sus.

By: C.S.Strowbridge

C.S.Strowbridge — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:26:02 +0000

“This is Brownback’s bloc to lose.”

He would lose to Kucinich. Hell, Thompson could lose to Kucinich.

By: SpiderJ

SpiderJ — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:22:22 +0000

And Mitt’s a *shudder* Mormon, and we already know how they feel about McCain.

This is Brownback’s bloc to lose.

By: C.S.Strowbridge

C.S.Strowbridge — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:34:56 +0000

Didn’t they say the same thing about Giuliani? Aren’t they one and two on the depth chart for the Republicans?