Bush Unites
Tweet
He’s bringing the country together in opposition to him.
In the polling world, President Bush has had a “leveling effect among subgroups,” as Geoff Garin, a Democratic pollster, put it. The tension between groups like married women and unmarried women is disappearing. That’s what happens when a president has a 30 percent job approval rating; there’s not much room for dramatic contrast.
…
Greg Ross, 47 years old, a computer consultant from Fayetteville, Ga., is typical of Republican men who are thinking of voting Democratic in 2008. He is upset about the war and the handling of the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. He recalls the Clinton years fondly, even though he did not vote for Bill Clinton. “The major reason I would vote Democrat is that the current administration in the White House is not listening to others and not really governing according to the will of the people,” Mr. Ross said. “Unless something major changes, which I don’t perceive happening, I’m voting Democrat.”
The next president, regardless of party but likely Democratic, will have to govern as the leader of us all and not his or her party’s base. That kind of leadership racks up short term political gain at the expense of national will, purpose, and cohesion. For all their faults on actual policy, this is something past Republican presidents like George H.W. Bush and Ronald Reagan did as well as Democrats like FDR and Clinton.
2 Responses to “Bush Unites”
GOP Rep. Spencer Bachus Facing House Ethics Probe For Insider Trading
Jennifer Aniston Reportedly Pregnant With Twins
PHOTOS: Tamara Ecclestone At The Langham Hotel
Red Front? “Center For American Freedom” Logo Echoes Communist Style
Romney Calls For Defunding Planned Parenthood, Wife Was A Donor
GOP Fundraising Email Asks Supporters To “Knock Out” Obama
Romney Comes Up Limp In Nevada
Obama Opens Lead On Romney In New Poll
Latest Entries
Why Do Liberals Support Drone Strikes?
Weekly Standard Rolls Out The Iraq Argument For Iran
Equal Polarization, My Ass
Some Crazy Stuff That Happened In World War II
Maryland Republican Campaign Funds Used To Defend Voter Suppression
The Obama Jobs Record In One Graph
Martin O’Malley All In For Marriage Equality
Newt Gingrich, Filled With More Excrement Than Your Average Politician
New Year, Powerline Still Stupid
Thanks Again
Meta
Blogroll
Disclaimer
The views on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

“The next president, regardless of party but likely Democratic, will have to govern as the leader of us all and not his or her party’s base. That kind of leadership racks up short term political gain at the expense of national will, purpose, and cohesion.”
This assumes that the President actually cares about national will, etc. We have seen no evidence that President Bush believes this, and no evidence that Congress is inclined to remind him of such things. We won’t even talk about the MSM’s role.
I think, actually I fear, that suceeding Presidents will learn a terrible lesson from the Bush presidency. That they can do pretty much whatever they want to do, without fear of any consequences.
Think about it.
I’m not really anonymous. The website has apparently lost my sign-in info.
Cordially Yours, zak822
Well I think that’s the reason for making a good showing at the polls in all elections for the next several years. The next President won’t feel they can do whatever they want if Congressional leaders are elected that actually hold the President responsible.
I agree with you completely Oliver. It is time that all of our elected officials started to realize that they are servants of the public, not endowed with power for their own pocket.