Comments on: Military Money Goes Democratic

By: SpiderJ

SpiderJ — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:50:22 +0000

Fred here embodies glass-half-full–or glass 60% full, I guess–thinking to an utmost degree. I’m sure he’s also really peeved that nobody reports on the Iraqis and American soldiers who survived this week in Iraq, instead focusing on the “small price” of those who died.

By: C.S.Strowbridge

C.S.Strowbridge — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 05:36:21 +0000

Fredfarkle, a 17% change in one cycle is huge. Even someone as stupid as you must recognize that.

By the way, the Republican earning the most acordin g to this study is Ron Paul. I don’t think he’s going to be big on the Campaign trail during the general election.

By: Oliver Willis

Oliver Willis — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 04:36:47 +0000

And that 60% is a lot less than what it was before the Iraq War. Facts don’t change just because you wrote something in a blog’s comments, you know.

By: fredfarkle

fredfarkle — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 04:34:52 +0000

Or we could try this headline:

Sixty percent of all military donations still go to republicans!

As opposed to Olivers yellow journalism one…

By: bryan

bryan — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 03:41:42 +0000

Wanna win for the dems? Imply that the reps will be having a draft for Iraq if they win!

By: OxyCon

OxyCon — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 03:14:16 +0000

Another George W. Bush success story.

By: SpiderJ

SpiderJ — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 03:11:40 +0000

Come, Oliver, you know why. It’s because the military is turning into a bunch of terrorist-appeasing defeatocrats!

Oh how Rush and BillO and all the rest will bemoan how they are the last true Americans left.