According to Instapundit aka Glenn Reynolds, people against the war are “on the other side”.
Breaking News
Oprah Quitting TV Show In 2011
Glenn Reynolds Strikes Again
September 12th, 2007
11 Comments
You could pick up one of these.
Oliver’s upset that Reynolds was mean to a deranged killer who also happened to be an anti-war protester.
And no, Reynolds never said that all anti-war protesters were “on the other side.”
I’m shocked, shocked that a site that says all Conservatives are bloodthirsty Nazis who want to kill as many gays and Mexicans as possible is upset that an out-of-the-norm example is being used to paint the opposing side as extremists.
SHOCKED!
a site that says all Conservatives are bloodthirsty Nazis who want to kill as many gays and Mexicans as possible
Really? Where?
“I’m shocked, shocked that a site that says…”
A lie that powerful should cause an aneurysm in whoever says it.
Right here.
SaveFarris said: “Right here.”
Fucking. Liar.
Did you think we wouldn’t read those links? Do you really think we are as stupid as you are?
SaveFarris said:
I’m shocked, shocked that a site that says all Conservatives are bloodthirsty Nazis who want to kill as many gays and Mexicans as possible is upset that an out-of-the-norm example is being used to paint the opposing side as extremists.
SHOCKED!
Quaker in a Basement said:
Really? Where?
SaveFarris said:
Right here.
And links to:
Conservative Worldnetdaily columnist says mass deportations of Latinos would be easy… because it wasn’t too hard for the Nazis to deport 6 million Jews.
I kid you not.
which of course proves his point that OW said that all Conservatives are bloodthirsty Nazis who want to kill as many gays and Mexicans as possible… Oh, wait…
and:
Compassionate conservatives strike again.
Which also is a clear indication that OW was tarring every single conservative that evar existed!!!!!1!1!!! Oh, wait…
Smarter Reich wingnut ditto monkeys, please…
And now Tom brings us back around to my original point:
If you don’t think OW wasn’t tarring every single conservative, what makes you (and OW) think that Instapundit was tarring the entire anti-war crowd?
SaveFarris said:
And now Tom brings us back around to my original point:
Which I believe I’m seeing above as
I’m shocked, shocked that a site that says all Conservatives are bloodthirsty Nazis who want to kill as many gays and Mexicans as possible is upset that an out-of-the-norm example is being used to paint the opposing side as extremists.
Your comment seems to suggest to me that, aside from the gratuitous insult/lie about OW saying that all Conservatives are bloodthirsty Nazis who want to kill as many gays and Mexicans as possible, you’re saying that an out-of-the-norm example is being used by InstaCracker to paint the opposing side as extremists. Nothing at all about OW being unfair in his criticism.
“you’re saying that an out-of-the-norm example is being used by InstaCracker to paint the opposing side as extremists. Nothing at all about OW being unfair in his criticism.”
It’s the, “out-of-the-norm example” that’s key.
Trent Lott admitted Republicans used a racist strategy to win the south. He even apologized for it, but after receiving complaints, rescinded his apology.
Gay bashing is also not a rare event for conservatives. Not just the move to ban gay marriage at a constitutional level, but they want to prevent attacks based on sexual orientation to be a hate crime. Hell, that Republican said Larry Craig should be killed cause he’s gay.
So on the one hand we have a freak event and on the other we have part of a pattern. But no, according to SaveFarris they are the same. How could any one disagree with SaveFarris.