Shorter Peter Beinart
Tweet
The netroots should be silly and back unrealistic candidates like Mike Gravel instead of being actually useful and making people like me look dumb.
One Response to “Shorter Peter Beinart”
GOP Rep. Spencer Bachus Facing House Ethics Probe For Insider Trading
Jennifer Aniston Reportedly Pregnant With Twins
PHOTOS: Tamara Ecclestone At The Langham Hotel
Red Front? “Center For American Freedom” Logo Echoes Communist Style
Romney Calls For Defunding Planned Parenthood, Wife Was A Donor
GOP Fundraising Email Asks Supporters To “Knock Out” Obama
Romney Comes Up Limp In Nevada
Obama Opens Lead On Romney In New Poll
Latest Entries
Why Do Liberals Support Drone Strikes?
Weekly Standard Rolls Out The Iraq Argument For Iran
Equal Polarization, My Ass
Some Crazy Stuff That Happened In World War II
Maryland Republican Campaign Funds Used To Defend Voter Suppression
The Obama Jobs Record In One Graph
Martin O’Malley All In For Marriage Equality
Newt Gingrich, Filled With More Excrement Than Your Average Politician
New Year, Powerline Still Stupid
Thanks Again
Meta
Blogroll
Disclaimer
The views on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

As someone who deeply detests Peter Beinart, the historical section of his commentary isn’t bad — his main question is why the netroots believe that they can achieve success working in Democratic Party related activities whereas previous liberal and leftist principled activists seemed to reject that option.
Beinart seems to come up shallow with his analysis of what would happen should Democrats win, because his view is that this would discombobulate the netroots, and besides, having abandoned a ‘revolutionary leftist’ perspective how could the netroots threaten the ‘pragmatists’ in power with anything?
Beinart seems not to have noticed that the netroots is currently dealing with that very problem — they are simultaneously working for even more progressive and liberal victories while remaining fully cognizant that Democrats in office or soon to be office are always able to abandon the principles which got them there.
That’s why he snips about Mike Gravel at the end. He seems completely to be avoiding the issue of Gravel’s current sheer crankiness and nuttiness, as though us ordinary blog readers are weirdos who only remembers what Gravel did with the Pentagon Papers.
What Beinart signs off with is the snarky hypothetical that if the netroots get their big Democratic win, then soon those Democrats when in power will forget about the netroots, and hey, what will you do then?