<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conservative Humor Fails (Again)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/14/conservative-humor-fails-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/14/conservative-humor-fails-again/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:44:47 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ohio Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/14/conservative-humor-fails-again/#comment-63990</link>
		<dc:creator>Ohio Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5480#comment-63990</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The first airing, February 18 was a hit, with more than 1.4 million viewers. The show averaged 258,000 viewers (25-54 demo) in its last 10 airings, winning its timeslot all but once.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t understand?  If it was a &quot;hit&quot; on its initial airing, and it won its time slot every time with one exception, and appealed to that treasured 25-54 demographic then why, pray tell, would they &quot;shelve it&quot;?

Seems odd to me.  I mean, doesn&#039;t that qualify it as a keeper?

Could it be because the GOP label is held in such low esteem?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The first airing, February 18 was a hit, with more than 1.4 million viewers. The show averaged 258,000 viewers (25-54 demo) in its last 10 airings, winning its timeslot all but once.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand?  If it was a &#8220;hit&#8221; on its initial airing, and it won its time slot every time with one exception, and appealed to that treasured 25-54 demographic then why, pray tell, would they &#8220;shelve it&#8221;?</p>
<p>Seems odd to me.  I mean, doesn&#8217;t that qualify it as a keeper?</p>
<p>Could it be because the GOP label is held in such low esteem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PD100</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/14/conservative-humor-fails-again/#comment-63989</link>
		<dc:creator>PD100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5480#comment-63989</guid>
		<description>Clinton&#039;s fault!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton&#8217;s fault!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/14/conservative-humor-fails-again/#comment-63988</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5480#comment-63988</guid>
		<description>I wonder, which liberal groups conservatives will blame this on?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder, which liberal groups conservatives will blame this on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
