The Apparently Blind (And Dumb) Howard Kurtz

8:01 pm EST August 9th, 2007 | News | 2 Comments

Bear in mind that this “reporting” comes from the media reporter for the primary newspaper in our nation’s capital. This isn’t a guy at the Podunk Times writing about the Mystery Theater on Channel 52. This is Howard Kurtz, in the Washington Post.

In the August 8 edition of his column, Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz noted Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-IL) August 6 statement that he “never called for an invasion of Pakistan” in his August 1 foreign policy speech and that “the misreporting that was done needs to be cleared up.” Kurtz described Obama as “blaming the media” and responded: “I sure didn’t see anyone reporting that Obama wanted to invade Pakistan.” Kurtz continued: “I read that he would be willing to conduct raids against al-Qaeda without necessarily getting permission from Pakistan’s sovereign government.” In fact, numerous media outlets have reported that Obama, in the August 1 speech, stated that he was willing to “invade Pakistan.”

If you go to the link, you’ll see a video with all the things Howard Kurtz didn’t – or more likely – wouldn’t see. Don’t trust the mainstream media, they just want to hurt you.

Topic:

Related Posts

«
»

2 Responses to “The Apparently Blind (And Dumb) Howard Kurtz”

  1. Dugger says:
    August 10, 2007 at 10:00 am

    Ohh. Obama didn’t call for an invasion. He merely called for US troops to enter Pakistani territory, conduct military operations therein – all against the wishes the sovereign Pakistani nation and government. Well then, I guess Japan didn’t invade China, Mussolini Ethiopia, Hitler Poland, Kruschev Hungary, etc. Progressive history everyone.

  2. Duros62 says:
    August 10, 2007 at 12:25 pm

    There he goes again, supporting our enemies.