<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Unclear On Nukes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/02/obama-unclear-on-nukes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/02/obama-unclear-on-nukes/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carole Bowers</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/02/obama-unclear-on-nukes/#comment-64978</link>
		<dc:creator>Carole Bowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 08:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5589#comment-64978</guid>
		<description>logeum dysuric cozier renegade bewimple outbond erythrodermia facewise
&lt;a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/10.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;10&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/16.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/16.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/16.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/2.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/13.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/13.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/13.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/5.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;5&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/11.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/11.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/11.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/8.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;8&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/9.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/9.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/9.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/18.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;18&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/6.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/6.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/6.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/3.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;3&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/17.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/17.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/17.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/7.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;7&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/1.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/1.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/1.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/12.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;12&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/10.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/10.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/10.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/18.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;18&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/14.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/14.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/14.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/2.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/16.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/16.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/16.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>logeum dysuric cozier renegade bewimple outbond erythrodermia facewise<br />
<a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/10.html" rel="nofollow">10</a><br />
<a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/16.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/16.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/16.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/2.html" rel="nofollow">2</a><br />
<a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/13.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/13.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/13.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/5.html" rel="nofollow">5</a><br />
<a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/11.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/11.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/11.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/8.html" rel="nofollow">8</a><br />
<a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/9.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/9.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/9.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/18.html" rel="nofollow">18</a><br />
<a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/6.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/6.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/6.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/3.html" rel="nofollow">3</a><br />
<a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/17.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/17.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/17.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/7.html" rel="nofollow">7</a><br />
<a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/1.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/1.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/12.html" rel="nofollow">12</a><br />
<a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/10.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/10.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/10.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/18.html" rel="nofollow">18</a><br />
<a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/14.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/14.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/14.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/2.html" rel="nofollow">2</a><br />
<a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/16.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/16.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/16.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/02/obama-unclear-on-nukes/#comment-64977</link>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 14:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5589#comment-64977</guid>
		<description>I understand what you're saying, but I have to respectfully disagree.  "All options are on the table" makes good copy, but some options shouldn't even be anywhere near the table, let alone on it.

I have to give Mike Gravel credit for being one of the few politicians who calls bullshit on having all options on the table.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand what you&#8217;re saying, but I have to respectfully disagree.  &#8220;All options are on the table&#8221; makes good copy, but some options shouldn&#8217;t even be anywhere near the table, let alone on it.</p>
<p>I have to give Mike Gravel credit for being one of the few politicians who calls bullshit on having all options on the table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/02/obama-unclear-on-nukes/#comment-64976</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5589#comment-64976</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I was referring to the Pakistanis, BTW.&lt;/i&gt;

Ya, I got that. Still stupid.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I was referring to the Pakistanis, BTW.</i></p>
<p>Ya, I got that. Still stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/02/obama-unclear-on-nukes/#comment-64975</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5589#comment-64975</guid>
		<description>Maybe some people have forgotten what all happened to Mr. Gore in 1999 and 2000. He made innocuous, reasonable, and accurate statements only to see reporters from big news orgs turn them into &lt;em&gt;proof! by golly!&lt;/em&gt; that he was a nut and a liar.

The mistake comes in thinking that the inside-the-beltway press listens first, then makes up a tale to fit what the candidate said. In fact, it's just the opposite: the press corps defines its script and shapes the facts to fit.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe some people have forgotten what all happened to Mr. Gore in 1999 and 2000. He made innocuous, reasonable, and accurate statements only to see reporters from big news orgs turn them into <em>proof! by golly!</em> that he was a nut and a liar.</p>
<p>The mistake comes in thinking that the inside-the-beltway press listens first, then makes up a tale to fit what the candidate said. In fact, it&#8217;s just the opposite: the press corps defines its script and shapes the facts to fit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/02/obama-unclear-on-nukes/#comment-64974</link>
		<dc:creator>D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5589#comment-64974</guid>
		<description>O-Dub, are you serious?!? Obama made a completely reasonable statement to not use nukes. The nuclear option is really only a   strategic defensive weapon which is good as a deterrent against other states. The repercussions would be too severe if we used nukes to attack a terrorist camp, especially, when conventional weapons work just as well.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O-Dub, are you serious?!? Obama made a completely reasonable statement to not use nukes. The nuclear option is really only a   strategic defensive weapon which is good as a deterrent against other states. The repercussions would be too severe if we used nukes to attack a terrorist camp, especially, when conventional weapons work just as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/02/obama-unclear-on-nukes/#comment-64973</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5589#comment-64973</guid>
		<description>Are you stupid? Seriously.

Probably.

Self deprecation, even humorous, is a rare and refreshing thing on this board.  Ironic that it comes a 'hit and runner' against Quaker.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you stupid? Seriously.</p>
<p>Probably.</p>
<p>Self deprecation, even humorous, is a rare and refreshing thing on this board.  Ironic that it comes a &#8216;hit and runner&#8217; against Quaker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enlightened Liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/02/obama-unclear-on-nukes/#comment-64972</link>
		<dc:creator>Enlightened Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 12:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5589#comment-64972</guid>
		<description>Quaker is right (seems like that should just be a macro on the keyboard).  If Obama said that nukes are on the table, he would have been derided as a wild-eyed dangerous n- person by the right.  If he equivocated, he would have been called indecisive.  Though this wasn't Obama's finest moment, now the impression some voters following Obama have is that OBAMA WANTS TO CATCH BIN LADEN.  Not like the terrorists appeasers on the right.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quaker is right (seems like that should just be a macro on the keyboard).  If Obama said that nukes are on the table, he would have been derided as a wild-eyed dangerous n- person by the right.  If he equivocated, he would have been called indecisive.  Though this wasn&#8217;t Obama&#8217;s finest moment, now the impression some voters following Obama have is that OBAMA WANTS TO CATCH BIN LADEN.  Not like the terrorists appeasers on the right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/02/obama-unclear-on-nukes/#comment-64971</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 08:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5589#comment-64971</guid>
		<description>OW:

&lt;em&gt;Do you want a Democrat in the White House? Get used to slogans.

"It's the economy, stupid."
"The people not the powerful."&lt;/em&gt;

As I recall, these "slogans" weren't answers to  questions, but summarizations of the legendary wonkery of Mr. Clinton and Mr. Gore. Both were backed up with a couple of boxcars full of nuance.

Same challenge for you as for Vic--rewrite Mr. Obama's answer. Give him a "slogan" that fits and &lt;em&gt;doesn't&lt;/em&gt; leave him vulnerable to attack.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OW:</p>
<p><em>Do you want a Democrat in the White House? Get used to slogans.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s the economy, stupid.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;The people not the powerful.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>As I recall, these &#8220;slogans&#8221; weren&#8217;t answers to  questions, but summarizations of the legendary wonkery of Mr. Clinton and Mr. Gore. Both were backed up with a couple of boxcars full of nuance.</p>
<p>Same challenge for you as for Vic&#8211;rewrite Mr. Obama&#8217;s answer. Give him a &#8220;slogan&#8221; that fits and <em>doesn&#8217;t</em> leave him vulnerable to attack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/02/obama-unclear-on-nukes/#comment-64970</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 08:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5589#comment-64970</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Are you stupid? Seriously.&lt;/em&gt;

Probably.

&lt;em&gt;Nuance doesn't trouble me.&lt;/em&gt;

Sure it does. You said so yourself at 6:33 and 58 seconds.

&lt;em&gt;It's half wits like you who want the world to think when in fact the world works at the gut level.&lt;/em&gt;

Reason? Intellect? Logic? Nosiree! We'll have none, thank you.

&lt;em&gt;We will continue to lose until we play politics like the right does, i.e. the half wit slogans which you deride.&lt;/em&gt;

And if we win with half-wit slogans, &lt;em&gt;then&lt;/em&gt; will we turn back to actual policy?

&lt;em&gt;I for one would rather win.&lt;/em&gt;

And I would like to know what our prospective leaders actually plan to do. Second-guessing the reactions of the press and the right-wing attack dogs is a sucker's game.

Go ahead. Rewrite Mr. Obama's response for him--but make sure you give him an answer to the question that &lt;em&gt;doesn't&lt;/em&gt; leave him open to the predictable attacks from all the usual suspects.

I sez you can't.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Are you stupid? Seriously.</em></p>
<p>Probably.</p>
<p><em>Nuance doesn&#8217;t trouble me.</em></p>
<p>Sure it does. You said so yourself at 6:33 and 58 seconds.</p>
<p><em>It&#8217;s half wits like you who want the world to think when in fact the world works at the gut level.</em></p>
<p>Reason? Intellect? Logic? Nosiree! We&#8217;ll have none, thank you.</p>
<p><em>We will continue to lose until we play politics like the right does, i.e. the half wit slogans which you deride.</em></p>
<p>And if we win with half-wit slogans, <em>then</em> will we turn back to actual policy?</p>
<p><em>I for one would rather win.</em></p>
<p>And I would like to know what our prospective leaders actually plan to do. Second-guessing the reactions of the press and the right-wing attack dogs is a sucker&#8217;s game.</p>
<p>Go ahead. Rewrite Mr. Obama&#8217;s response for him&#8211;but make sure you give him an answer to the question that <em>doesn&#8217;t</em> leave him open to the predictable attacks from all the usual suspects.</p>
<p>I sez you can&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/02/obama-unclear-on-nukes/#comment-64969</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 06:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5589#comment-64969</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; Without this "nuance" that troubles you so, he'd be reduced to slinging jingoistic, half-wit slogans.&lt;/i&gt;

Do you want a Democrat in the White House? Get used to slogans.

"It's the economy, stupid."
"The people not the powerful."
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Without this &#8220;nuance&#8221; that troubles you so, he&#8217;d be reduced to slinging jingoistic, half-wit slogans.</i></p>
<p>Do you want a Democrat in the White House? Get used to slogans.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s the economy, stupid.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;The people not the powerful.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gravypan</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/02/obama-unclear-on-nukes/#comment-64968</link>
		<dc:creator>Gravypan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 03:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5589#comment-64968</guid>
		<description>Duros, your reading skills never cease to amaze me.

I was referring to the Pakistanis, BTW.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duros, your reading skills never cease to amaze me.</p>
<p>I was referring to the Pakistanis, BTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/02/obama-unclear-on-nukes/#comment-64967</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 02:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5589#comment-64967</guid>
		<description>Quaker in a Basement,

Are you stupid? Seriously. Nuance doesn't trouble me. It's half wits like you who want the world to think when in fact the world works at the gut level. We will continue to lose until we play politics like the right does, i.e. the half wit slogans which you deride. I for one would rather win.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quaker in a Basement,</p>
<p>Are you stupid? Seriously. Nuance doesn&#8217;t trouble me. It&#8217;s half wits like you who want the world to think when in fact the world works at the gut level. We will continue to lose until we play politics like the right does, i.e. the half wit slogans which you deride. I for one would rather win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PwapVt</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/02/obama-unclear-on-nukes/#comment-64966</link>
		<dc:creator>PwapVt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 01:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5589#comment-64966</guid>
		<description>I fully support never ever using nukes in any circumstance.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully support never ever using nukes in any circumstance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/02/obama-unclear-on-nukes/#comment-64965</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 00:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5589#comment-64965</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Have people learned fucking nothing from the "I voted for the 87 billion before I voted against it" debacle? Obama should know that his answers will be twisted and used against him. There is no nuance in politics.&lt;/em&gt;

My goodness.

By that standard, Mr. Obama will have very little to say. Without this "nuance" that troubles you so, he'd be reduced to slinging jingoistic, half-wit slogans.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Have people learned fucking nothing from the &#8220;I voted for the 87 billion before I voted against it&#8221; debacle? Obama should know that his answers will be twisted and used against him. There is no nuance in politics.</em></p>
<p>My goodness.</p>
<p>By that standard, Mr. Obama will have very little to say. Without this &#8220;nuance&#8221; that troubles you so, he&#8217;d be reduced to slinging jingoistic, half-wit slogans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megamoze</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/02/obama-unclear-on-nukes/#comment-64964</link>
		<dc:creator>Megamoze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 00:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5589#comment-64964</guid>
		<description>I think it's perfectly reasonable to take some options off the table, particularly suicidal options that will solve absolutely nothing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s perfectly reasonable to take some options off the table, particularly suicidal options that will solve absolutely nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/02/obama-unclear-on-nukes/#comment-64963</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5589#comment-64963</guid>
		<description>Have people learned fucking nothing from the "I voted for the 87 billion before I voted against it" debacle? Obama should know that his answers will be twisted and used against him. There is no nuance in politics. He screwed up big time.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have people learned fucking nothing from the &#8220;I voted for the 87 billion before I voted against it&#8221; debacle? Obama should know that his answers will be twisted and used against him. There is no nuance in politics. He screwed up big time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/02/obama-unclear-on-nukes/#comment-64962</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5589#comment-64962</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Especially when they, themselves, have nukes.&lt;/i&gt;

Al Qaeda has nukes now? News to me. Quick, call Jack Bauer!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Especially when they, themselves, have nukes.</i></p>
<p>Al Qaeda has nukes now? News to me. Quick, call Jack Bauer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/02/obama-unclear-on-nukes/#comment-64961</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 22:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5589#comment-64961</guid>
		<description>Here we go again with the conventional wisdom.  This time, it's "quite simply you never take any options off the table as president."  Why not?  Even something as nonsensical as a nuclear first strike?  Obama is completely right once again and I don't care if the so-called experts disagree.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we go again with the conventional wisdom.  This time, it&#8217;s &#8220;quite simply you never take any options off the table as president.&#8221;  Why not?  Even something as nonsensical as a nuclear first strike?  Obama is completely right once again and I don&#8217;t care if the so-called experts disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cellulose</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/02/obama-unclear-on-nukes/#comment-64960</link>
		<dc:creator>cellulose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 22:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5589#comment-64960</guid>
		<description>Lord help us if we pick our next president based on his/her response to stupid hypothetical questions.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lord help us if we pick our next president based on his/her response to stupid hypothetical questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gravypan</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/08/02/obama-unclear-on-nukes/#comment-64959</link>
		<dc:creator>Gravypan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5589#comment-64959</guid>
		<description>Especially when they, themselves, have nukes.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Especially when they, themselves, have nukes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
