Republican Field Ignores Iraq

8:05 pm EST June 25th, 2007 | News | 5 Comments

Iraq? What is this Iraq you speak of, say the 2008 Republican candidates. Clearly the most important issue in America today is… earmarks.

Topic:

Related Posts

«
»

5 Responses to “Republican Field Ignores Iraq”

  1. sakthi says:
    June 26, 2007 at 12:27 pm

    Rudy’s answer really shows how much the republicans are doesn’t care about the humans life..They just want to keep the war controversies aside,because they know that it’ll badly affect their image in 2008 election…
    car insurance comparison

  2. Frank says:
    June 26, 2007 at 1:31 pm

    I know all the Democrats in America race to their morning paper to see how many soldiers died in Iraq yesterday.

  3. Repack Rider says:
    June 26, 2007 at 5:28 pm

    I know all the Democrats in America race to their morning paper to see how many soldiers died in Iraq yesterday.

    I guess I’m not a Democrat then. Coulda fooled me.

    I know that the best way to be identified by a Republican as a member of Al Qaeda is to be a dead Iraqi. You would think that after killing tens of thousands of AQ in Iraq, many of them children, we would be making progress, but you would be wrong.

    Frank, what was the “mission” in Iraq? I can’t remember.

  4. Frank says:
    June 26, 2007 at 5:46 pm

    To overthrow Saddam Hussein. Mission Accomplished.

    Always glad to help.

  5. Nimrod Gently says:
    June 26, 2007 at 6:53 pm

    Right then.

    a) Why? I mean, I know “gassed his own people (with gas we gave him for that purpose)” and blah blah blah, but I mean specifically, why did we suddenly sit up and say “you know what, let’s topple Saddam” in particular? Why that particular tyrant at that particular time, As opposed to, say, Charles Taylor or Robert Mugabe? And couldn’t there have been easier, better, more efficient ways to remove Saddam than invading his country, murdering thousands of his people, destroying what ragged infrastructure the country had before, and igniting tensions between rival factions of Muslims, plunging the country into a Civil War arguably even deadlier, pound for pound, than the already sufficently deadly Hussein regime?

    b) If the mission’s accomplised, why are we still there, genius?

    c) You realise that statement is going to bite you on the ass for the rest of your posting life?