Cause you said something fucking moronic.

“and two sentences later try to engage me in a serious conversation?”

Really? I’m pretty sure it was the next sentence.

“Now you’re calling me a fucking moron because you did say what I said you said.”

Wow. I guess I have to use shorter sentences due to your obvious developmental difficulties.

1.) You accused OW of acting like McCarthy.
2.) It was pointed out that McCarthy is a hero to the right.
3.) You claimed he’s hated by both sides.
4.) It was pointed out that the right loves McCarthy, using Anne Coulter as an example.
5.) You claimed that cause you don’t like McCarthy, the right doesn’t.
6.) Now I’m pointing out that you are not more representative of the right than Anne Coulter, who is one of the best selling right-wing authors.

Do you get it now?

“Go fuck yourself.
You make me want to puke.”

I hope you don’t think these have any zing to them. Where I used to hang out, “Go fuck yourself.” was considered a rather pleasent greeting.

“Now that you and Zython are actually trying to have a discussion, I am no longer interested.”

I don’t think you are capable of having a discussion. You can only have fights.

“This is what happens when you treat people like shit. I want nothing to do with either one of you.”

Yet you keep responding to us, something you said, in my case anyway, that you would try your hardest not to do.

What the hell did I do? You were the one who said that you didn’t care who was in charge of this country.

Here is where you said I agreed with Ann Coulter:

You guys believe it

Now you’re calling me a fucking moron because you did say what I said you said.

Go fuck yourself.

You make me want to puke.

Now that you and Zython are actually trying to have a discussion, I am no longer interested. You were made for each other; enjoy each others’ company.

This is what happens when you treat people like shit. I want nothing to do with either one of you.

It would be different if Guliani came out and attacked what these people did, but he’s never stopped defending them.

Not just that, but like I said the last time this was brought up, there’s a legitimate concern that if Rudy were president, he would appoint people like these into high-ranking government positions. But apparantly, people like Frank don’t care if a mobster is made head of the world bank, or if a cocaine dealer is made Drug Czar, or if Joe Francis is made head of the FCC. But HEAVEN FORBID if a “libural” actually take power!

Frank, you are a fucking moron. I never said you agreed with her, but don’t try and say the right hates McCarthy when it is clear they don’t.

“The similarity between Oliver, Media Matters, and Joe McCarthy is that guilt by association has become their trademark.”

Not just association, Frank. Guiliani has a habit of going to bat for people who are scum. This guy has been disciplined in a child sex scandal, Kerik was indicted, another was involved in cocaine trafficking.

It would be different if Guliani came out and attacked what these people did, but he’s never stopped defending them.

http://www.claremont.org/publications/crb/id.1200/article_detail.asp

Will you now insist, as you usually do, that you are right, and I am wrong?

The similarity between Oliver, Media Matters, and Joe McCarthy is that guilt by association has become their trademark.

You are free to disagree with that also.

Then why are you?

Tell that to Anne Coulter.

“He would be smiling at your use of them.”

So talking about a guy who has been disciplined in a child sex scandal is the same as a witchhunt over communism.

Do you really want to make that claim?

He would be smiling at your use of them.

Accused, he was suspended by his Church. That sounds like more than just accused.

And that was the point I was trying to point out last time this was brought up here, but the cons (well, Frank) said that they didn’t care.

Misplaced: You’re right.