<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 26-Percenters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/22/the-26-percenters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/22/the-26-percenters/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:02:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/22/the-26-percenters/#comment-68899</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5870#comment-68899</guid>
		<description>&quot;It&#039;s hard to ignore someone who&#039;s constantly pestering you.&quot;

Responding to you is not the same as pestering you. Even you must no that.

&quot;You&#039;re acting like a child; I&#039;m treating you like one.&quot;

You&#039;re acting like a fucking asshole, a retarded one at that; I&#039;m treating you like a fucking retarded asshole.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s hard to ignore someone who&#8217;s constantly pestering you.&#8221;</p>
<p>Responding to you is not the same as pestering you. Even you must no that.</p>
<p>&#8220;You&#8217;re acting like a child; I&#8217;m treating you like one.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re acting like a fucking asshole, a retarded one at that; I&#8217;m treating you like a fucking retarded asshole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/22/the-26-percenters/#comment-68898</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5870#comment-68898</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s hard to ignore someone who&#039;s constantly pestering you.

Even my children, when they were toddlers, knew that if they bothered me long enough, they would eventually get my attention.

You&#039;re acting like a child; I&#039;m treating you like one.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to ignore someone who&#8217;s constantly pestering you.</p>
<p>Even my children, when they were toddlers, knew that if they bothered me long enough, they would eventually get my attention.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re acting like a child; I&#8217;m treating you like one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/22/the-26-percenters/#comment-68897</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 06:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5870#comment-68897</guid>
		<description>Me: &quot;I will simply do my best in the future to ignore you&quot;

Frank: &quot;Calling people &quot;functionally retarded&quot; is exceptionally low - classed, even for you, the lowest of the low.&quot;

I&#039;ll put this exchange through the Frank-o-matic and let&#039;s see what come out.

...

&quot;I never called you functionally retarded. I merely asked if you were.&quot;

There you go.

By the way, good job on ignoring me. Is this really your best, or should I add that to the list of lies?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me: &#8220;I will simply do my best in the future to ignore you&#8221;</p>
<p>Frank: &#8220;Calling people &#8220;functionally retarded&#8221; is exceptionally low &#8211; classed, even for you, the lowest of the low.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll put this exchange through the Frank-o-matic and let&#8217;s see what come out.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;I never called you functionally retarded. I merely asked if you were.&#8221;</p>
<p>There you go.</p>
<p>By the way, good job on ignoring me. Is this really your best, or should I add that to the list of lies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/22/the-26-percenters/#comment-68896</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 20:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5870#comment-68896</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;I will simply do my best in the future to ignore you&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
Calling people &quot;functionally retarded&quot; is exceptionally low - classed, even for you, the lowest of the low.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;I will simply do my best in the future to ignore you&#8221;</i><br />
Calling people &#8220;functionally retarded&#8221; is exceptionally low &#8211; classed, even for you, the lowest of the low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/22/the-26-percenters/#comment-68895</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 07:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5870#comment-68895</guid>
		<description>&quot;See here:&quot;

Ignoring us means not posting. Or are you truly functionally retarded?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;See here:&#8221;</p>
<p>Ignoring us means not posting. Or are you truly functionally retarded?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/22/the-26-percenters/#comment-68894</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 19:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5870#comment-68894</guid>
		<description>See here:


&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/rudy-giulianis-.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/rudy-giulianis-.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/rudy-giulianis-.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Frank &#124; Jun 23, 2007 2:16:24 PM
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/rudy-giulianis-.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/rudy-giulianis-.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/rudy-giulianis-.html</a></p>
<p>Frank | Jun 23, 2007 2:16:24 PM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/22/the-26-percenters/#comment-68893</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 14:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5870#comment-68893</guid>
		<description>Zython: &quot;that probably doesn&#039;t even exist)&quot;

Frank: &quot;You saying I made it up?&quot;

No. There&#039;s probably a few fucking losers like you who think the same. But to describe the rantings of a few deranged lunatics a meme is not strictly accurate.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zython: &#8220;that probably doesn&#8217;t even exist)&#8221;</p>
<p>Frank: &#8220;You saying I made it up?&#8221;</p>
<p>No. There&#8217;s probably a few fucking losers like you who think the same. But to describe the rantings of a few deranged lunatics a meme is not strictly accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nimrod Gently</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/22/the-26-percenters/#comment-68892</link>
		<dc:creator>Nimrod Gently</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 13:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5870#comment-68892</guid>
		<description>The discussion ended, Frank, when you explicitly stated that the rules are different for Democratic presidents.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The discussion ended, Frank, when you explicitly stated that the rules are different for Democratic presidents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/22/the-26-percenters/#comment-68891</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 09:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5870#comment-68891</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;that probably doesn&#039;t even exist)&lt;/i&gt;
You saying I made it up?

Well,then, fuck you.

End of discussion.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>that probably doesn&#8217;t even exist)</i><br />
You saying I made it up?</p>
<p>Well,then, fuck you.</p>
<p>End of discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zython</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/22/the-26-percenters/#comment-68890</link>
		<dc:creator>Zython</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 08:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5870#comment-68890</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;How old are you? My kids visit that site and their teen agers!&lt;/i&gt;

A. I&#039;m not letting someone like you get a hold of imformation like that.

B. I don&#039;t visit YTMND, but you can&#039;t go far on the internet with encountering the memes that it spawns.

C. My point was that memes are completely meaningless and trite, and that using a meme (that probably doesn&#039;t even exist) in place of an arguement doesn&#039;t exactly help strengthen your position.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>How old are you? My kids visit that site and their teen agers!</i></p>
<p>A. I&#8217;m not letting someone like you get a hold of imformation like that.</p>
<p>B. I don&#8217;t visit YTMND, but you can&#8217;t go far on the internet with encountering the memes that it spawns.</p>
<p>C. My point was that memes are completely meaningless and trite, and that using a meme (that probably doesn&#8217;t even exist) in place of an arguement doesn&#8217;t exactly help strengthen your position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/22/the-26-percenters/#comment-68889</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 07:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5870#comment-68889</guid>
		<description>WRYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
YTMND
It&#039;s a trap
The goggles do nothing

I have never heard these, either...

And I wasn&#039;t referring to &quot;You&#039;re the Man Now, Dog&quot;

How old are you? My kids visit that site and their teen agers!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WRYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY<br />
YTMND<br />
It&#8217;s a trap<br />
The goggles do nothing</p>
<p>I have never heard these, either&#8230;</p>
<p>And I wasn&#8217;t referring to &#8220;You&#8217;re the Man Now, Dog&#8221;</p>
<p>How old are you? My kids visit that site and their teen agers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zython</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/22/the-26-percenters/#comment-68888</link>
		<dc:creator>Zython</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 07:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5870#comment-68888</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And if you continue to attack the man, you risk attacking the position.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s a risk I&#039;m willing to take.

&lt;i&gt;Do you know what meme is starting to circulate? &quot;Please, not another Clinton&quot;.&lt;/i&gt;

So what? &quot;It&#039;s a trap&quot;, &quot;The goggles do nothing&quot;, &quot;WRYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY&quot;, and pretty much anything else posted on YTMND are also memes. They don&#039;t mean anything.

Even so, I have NEVER heard that &quot;meme&quot; before.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And if you continue to attack the man, you risk attacking the position.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s a risk I&#8217;m willing to take.</p>
<p><i>Do you know what meme is starting to circulate? &#8220;Please, not another Clinton&#8221;.</i></p>
<p>So what? &#8220;It&#8217;s a trap&#8221;, &#8220;The goggles do nothing&#8221;, &#8220;WRYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY&#8221;, and pretty much anything else posted on YTMND are also memes. They don&#8217;t mean anything.</p>
<p>Even so, I have NEVER heard that &#8220;meme&#8221; before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/22/the-26-percenters/#comment-68887</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 06:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5870#comment-68887</guid>
		<description>Me: &quot;And that is much more serious, don&#039;t you agree?&quot;

Frank: &quot;No, I don&#039;t.&quot;

That&#039;s cause you are a moron.

Frank: &quot;Shooting someone with a derringer may kill them, hitting someone with a lead pipe may not.
Shooting someone with a derringer is genteel by comparison with hitting someone with a lead pipe, n&#039;est-ce pas?&quot;

This is so stupid it may have the power to cause cancer in lab rats.

Me: &quot;You are equating the man with the position in order to defend the man&quot;

Frank: &quot;And if you continue to attack the man, you risk attacking the position.&quot;

There is no risk, Frank. The office will survive as long as the country does. The only way to truly damage the office is to let the current occupant get away with being incompetent, corrupt, etc.

&#039;If Bush can be president, than anyone can.&#039;

Frank: &quot;Do you know what meme is starting to circulate? &#039;Please, not another Clinton&#039;.&quot;

Yeah, that meme is being circulated by Republicans who remember how popular the previous one is.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me: &#8220;And that is much more serious, don&#8217;t you agree?&#8221;</p>
<p>Frank: &#8220;No, I don&#8217;t.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s cause you are a moron.</p>
<p>Frank: &#8220;Shooting someone with a derringer may kill them, hitting someone with a lead pipe may not.<br />
Shooting someone with a derringer is genteel by comparison with hitting someone with a lead pipe, n&#8217;est-ce pas?&#8221;</p>
<p>This is so stupid it may have the power to cause cancer in lab rats.</p>
<p>Me: &#8220;You are equating the man with the position in order to defend the man&#8221;</p>
<p>Frank: &#8220;And if you continue to attack the man, you risk attacking the position.&#8221;</p>
<p>There is no risk, Frank. The office will survive as long as the country does. The only way to truly damage the office is to let the current occupant get away with being incompetent, corrupt, etc.</p>
<p>&#8216;If Bush can be president, than anyone can.&#8217;</p>
<p>Frank: &#8220;Do you know what meme is starting to circulate? &#8216;Please, not another Clinton&#8217;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, that meme is being circulated by Republicans who remember how popular the previous one is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/22/the-26-percenters/#comment-68886</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 06:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5870#comment-68886</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And that is much more serious, don&#039;t you agree?&lt;/i&gt;
No, I don&#039;t. Shooting someone with a derringer may kill them, hitting someone with a lead pipe may not.
Shooting someone with a derringer is genteel by comparison with hitting someone with a lead pipe, &lt;i&gt;n&#039;est-ce pas&lt;/i&gt;?

&lt;i&gt;You are equating the man with the position in order to defend the man&lt;/i&gt;
And if you continue to attack the man, you risk attacking the position.
Do you know what meme is starting to circulate? &quot;Please, not another Clinton&quot;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And that is much more serious, don&#8217;t you agree?</i><br />
No, I don&#8217;t. Shooting someone with a derringer may kill them, hitting someone with a lead pipe may not.<br />
Shooting someone with a derringer is genteel by comparison with hitting someone with a lead pipe, <i>n&#8217;est-ce pas</i>?</p>
<p><i>You are equating the man with the position in order to defend the man</i><br />
And if you continue to attack the man, you risk attacking the position.<br />
Do you know what meme is starting to circulate? &#8220;Please, not another Clinton&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/22/the-26-percenters/#comment-68885</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 05:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5870#comment-68885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Anybody remember anything in the same NEIGHBORHOOD as &#039;crap stain&#039;?&quot;

Yes. How about serial rapist and  murderer. There were also charges that Clinton was involved in cocaine trafficking.

&quot;Crap stain&quot; may sound vulgar, but what Clinton was called was libelous... or slander, depending if it was in print or not. And that is much more serious, don&#039;t you agree?

&quot;If the Democrats were to go far in besmirching the President as Clem suggested originally, they might produce just that effect: making the Presidency undesirable.&quot;

How? How does attacking one president for being incompetent, corrupt, etc. affect the office of presidency? You are equating the man with the position in order to defend the man, which is equal parts pathetic and desperate.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anybody remember anything in the same NEIGHBORHOOD as &#8216;crap stain&#8217;?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes. How about serial rapist and  murderer. There were also charges that Clinton was involved in cocaine trafficking.</p>
<p>&#8220;Crap stain&#8221; may sound vulgar, but what Clinton was called was libelous&#8230; or slander, depending if it was in print or not. And that is much more serious, don&#8217;t you agree?</p>
<p>&#8220;If the Democrats were to go far in besmirching the President as Clem suggested originally, they might produce just that effect: making the Presidency undesirable.&#8221;</p>
<p>How? How does attacking one president for being incompetent, corrupt, etc. affect the office of presidency? You are equating the man with the position in order to defend the man, which is equal parts pathetic and desperate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/22/the-26-percenters/#comment-68884</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 04:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5870#comment-68884</guid>
		<description>Neither did the Blogosphere, but I guess things change.
The worst I can recall is the Philanderer - in - Chief, which is mostly true, and scarcely vulgar/
Oh, yeah, there was &quot;Boy Clinton&quot;.

Anybody remember anything in the same NEIGHBORHOOD as &quot;crap stain&quot;?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neither did the Blogosphere, but I guess things change.<br />
The worst I can recall is the Philanderer &#8211; in &#8211; Chief, which is mostly true, and scarcely vulgar/<br />
Oh, yeah, there was &#8220;Boy Clinton&#8221;.</p>
<p>Anybody remember anything in the same NEIGHBORHOOD as &#8220;crap stain&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/22/the-26-percenters/#comment-68883</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 04:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5870#comment-68883</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;Crap stain&quot; didn&#039;t come up much.&lt;/em&gt;

Perhaps not (though I wouldn&#039;t wager on it). However, many &lt;em&gt;other&lt;/em&gt; &quot;crude and vulger terms&quot; were employed with regularity.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;Crap stain&#8221; didn&#8217;t come up much.</em></p>
<p>Perhaps not (though I wouldn&#8217;t wager on it). However, many <em>other</em> &#8220;crude and vulger terms&#8221; were employed with regularity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rounds77</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/22/the-26-percenters/#comment-68882</link>
		<dc:creator>Rounds77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5870#comment-68882</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m one of those disaffected ones who was thrilled to see the Dems achieve majorities in both houses, then became deflated watching them wimp out.

And as for this from Farris: &quot;I would also note that a general distrust in goverment would tend to favor conservatives, though whether it actually will remains to be seen.&quot;

Says who?  The Republicans are the pariah party of America (the Dems are very close behind).  No one, and I mean NO ONE (well, that pesky 26%, representing the country&#039;s village idiots, maybe), wants to see another Republican takeover of our government.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m one of those disaffected ones who was thrilled to see the Dems achieve majorities in both houses, then became deflated watching them wimp out.</p>
<p>And as for this from Farris: &#8220;I would also note that a general distrust in goverment would tend to favor conservatives, though whether it actually will remains to be seen.&#8221;</p>
<p>Says who?  The Republicans are the pariah party of America (the Dems are very close behind).  No one, and I mean NO ONE (well, that pesky 26%, representing the country&#8217;s village idiots, maybe), wants to see another Republican takeover of our government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/22/the-26-percenters/#comment-68881</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 23:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5870#comment-68881</guid>
		<description>Quaker: I watched television in the 1990&#039;s.
&quot;Crap stain&quot; didn&#039;t come up much.

Duros:
&lt;i&gt;I have great respect for the Office of the President. This President does not deserve such respect.&lt;/i&gt;

Then you respect the man who occupies that office. If you don&#039;t, you don&#039;t, but say so.

I am perfectly willing to say that Pres. Clinton disgraced the office of the President, but I wouldn&#039;t call him a Chimp, or a shrub, or an idiot, or a moron, or a crap stain.

I started calling you Scotty when I was trying to be Lysander II and you were one of the people calling me Frank.

Little things mean a lot, eh?

Remember this when the horses&#039; asses around here call me Frankie.

I&#039;ve had a personal rule for many a year: If you didn&#039;t know before I was 13, you don&#039;t call me Frankie.

Having said that, watch what happens over the next few days.

Say &quot;Hi!&quot; to Grandma for me.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quaker: I watched television in the 1990&#8217;s.<br />
&#8220;Crap stain&#8221; didn&#8217;t come up much.</p>
<p>Duros:<br />
<i>I have great respect for the Office of the President. This President does not deserve such respect.</i></p>
<p>Then you respect the man who occupies that office. If you don&#8217;t, you don&#8217;t, but say so.</p>
<p>I am perfectly willing to say that Pres. Clinton disgraced the office of the President, but I wouldn&#8217;t call him a Chimp, or a shrub, or an idiot, or a moron, or a crap stain.</p>
<p>I started calling you Scotty when I was trying to be Lysander II and you were one of the people calling me Frank.</p>
<p>Little things mean a lot, eh?</p>
<p>Remember this when the horses&#8217; asses around here call me Frankie.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had a personal rule for many a year: If you didn&#8217;t know before I was 13, you don&#8217;t call me Frankie.</p>
<p>Having said that, watch what happens over the next few days.</p>
<p>Say &#8220;Hi!&#8221; to Grandma for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/06/22/the-26-percenters/#comment-68880</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 21:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=5870#comment-68880</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;very good at forcing me to defend points I didn&#039;t make.]&lt;/i&gt;

You brought it up. I have great respect for the Office of the President. This President does not deserve such respect. time and again, he has broken his oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution from threats both foreign and domestic.

From one side of your mouth you call Liberal Democrats &quot;Jack-booted thugs&quot; and then say that some have the best interest of the country in mind.  I&#039;m pretty sure I can speak for all of the liberals here when I say we have the best interest of the country in mind.
You want jack-boots, go over to stormfront.

And please don&#039;t call me Scotty. My grandma calls me that, and you ain&#039;t her.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>very good at forcing me to defend points I didn&#8217;t make.]</i></p>
<p>You brought it up. I have great respect for the Office of the President. This President does not deserve such respect. time and again, he has broken his oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution from threats both foreign and domestic.</p>
<p>From one side of your mouth you call Liberal Democrats &#8220;Jack-booted thugs&#8221; and then say that some have the best interest of the country in mind.  I&#8217;m pretty sure I can speak for all of the liberals here when I say we have the best interest of the country in mind.<br />
You want jack-boots, go over to stormfront.</p>
<p>And please don&#8217;t call me Scotty. My grandma calls me that, and you ain&#8217;t her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
