Possible North Korea Progress
Tweet
Anybody else find it effing ridiculous that the Bush administration refused for years — years — to meet face to face with North Korea and the first time that we do, we may see real progress? Like me, are you kind of wondering what the hell that was all about and why are the Bushies so stupid?
5 Responses to “Possible North Korea Progress”
GOP Rep. Spencer Bachus Facing House Ethics Probe For Insider Trading
Jennifer Aniston Reportedly Pregnant With Twins
PHOTOS: Tamara Ecclestone At The Langham Hotel
Red Front? “Center For American Freedom” Logo Echoes Communist Style
Romney Calls For Defunding Planned Parenthood, Wife Was A Donor
GOP Fundraising Email Asks Supporters To “Knock Out” Obama
Romney Comes Up Limp In Nevada
Obama Opens Lead On Romney In New Poll
Latest Entries
Why Do Liberals Support Drone Strikes?
Weekly Standard Rolls Out The Iraq Argument For Iran
Equal Polarization, My Ass
Some Crazy Stuff That Happened In World War II
Maryland Republican Campaign Funds Used To Defend Voter Suppression
The Obama Jobs Record In One Graph
Martin O’Malley All In For Marriage Equality
Newt Gingrich, Filled With More Excrement Than Your Average Politician
New Year, Powerline Still Stupid
Thanks Again
Meta
Blogroll
Disclaimer
The views on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

It’s Clinton’s fault.
Actually, wait for the usual talking heads to start claiming this as a sign of Bush’s mastery of diplomacy…that the way to do things is clearly to refuse to talk to people for years, and then sit down with them after you’ve thoroughly destroyed your own global reputation and credibility.
Brilliance! Bush does it again!
They need N.K. as an enemy to scare their base into voting. However, at this point their base is 26% and that’s just not enough anymore.
Actually, multilateral meetings were the method preferred by Foggy Bottom.
Also I seem to remember a lot of criticism over “going it alone”, “not forming a coalition with our allies,” etc. Now are you all saying that we should go it alone and forgo input from out allies via a multilateral negotiating format?
Just curious …
“Now are you all saying that we should go it alone and forgo input from out allies via a multilateral negotiating format?”
What’s wrong with you? Why do you feel the need to use strawmen time after time? Can you not form a thought without lying?