Frank | Jun 23, 2007 2:16:24 PM”

Short Frank: IGNORE ME!

… Somebody left a baby.

Frank | Jun 23, 2007 2:16:24 PM

Frank: “a) No I don’t.”

Okay, so you probably haven’t attacked SaveFarris, but you attack everyone who responds for more than a handful of your posts.

If you got into a debate with Ghandi, he’d be driven to violence within half-an-hour.

“b) I don’t attack people everywhere, a point that you overlooked, because it spoiled your mockery of a thesis.”

No. It’s a claim I can neither confirm nor deny, cause I don’t know you from anywhere else.

Who knows, maybe this is the only place you go where people disagree with you. Hell, it’s probably the only place where people talk to you.

If I was your grandson and you called me, I’d tell you to fuck off and then hang up.

“c)There is more to narcissism than self – love, which we who have studied the DSM – IV, and can spell the word “psychology” know.”

What you described could also be delusions of grandeur. Narcissism is definitely different.

On a side note, harping on the spelling error is a Style over Substance fallacy, and you are losing credibility each time you do it.

“d) The reason I said I would never diagnose at a distance, is because I would not — and did not.”

Wow. More weasel words and plausible deniability.

I caught you doing exactly what you attacked me for doing, (thus piling more evidence for the self-hate theory). Your splitting of hairs doesn’t change that.

A diagnosis is a guess at what’s wrong with a person, based on evidence.

As you accumulate evidence you approach a diagnosis. If a person exhibits one behavior, such as a belief that Jesus speaks to him through the television set on a regular basis, that is a visual hallucination.

That usually is evidence of psychosis.

It is usually evidence of schizophrenia.

But do we take that evidence and diagnose that person?

No. We say, there is evidence of psychotic schizophrenia.

When the blood tests come back we discover that he has taken huge doses of LSD and MDMA.

That changes everything.

Got it?

Good.

Glad to be of service.

So…you’re saying that you prognose at a distance? Oh yeah, that’s SO much freaking better.

And, finally, the punchline: Plausible deniability so you can fool yourself into thinking you are better than you are. That’s the root of your problems.

And say goodbye to self – hatred.

You know the saying: Keep your day job. Mental health is not your thing.

You do, Frank. You attack everyone here. It’s just I respond to your posts more often than the rest.

“People who can’t even conceive that they are disliked are called narcissistic.”

Actually, that’s not the case. Narcissism is merely self-love, and not in the Palm Sisters kind of way, (although there can be a sexual aspect to it). Simply put, narcissism is nothing more than having a big ego, which I’ve admitted to. I’ve also admitted to being an asshole, which further destroys your argument.

“I would never diagnose at a distance”

You just did, Frank. But you did it in a way that would allow you to pretend you didn’t. Plausible deniability so you can fool yourself into thinking you are better than you are. That’s the root of your problems.

“Bigotry” is such an overused word. I was, I admit, mistaken about Canada. The only thing that sucks about Canada, to my knowledge, is you.

As for my self – hatred, let me explain something simple enough for even you to understand. If it were possible for me to possess the characteristics and behaviors that I hate (which you claim I see in you, but you do not possess), then wouldn’t I see those characteristics in everyone?

Let’s say I possess characteristics X, Y, and Z. They are negative, I see them in you, and I hate you for it. But YOU don’t possess those qualities, right? I do, right?

Ok, then, why don’t I hate everybody? Even in this blog there are people I don’t hate. There are people in this blog that I disagree with that I don’t hate. There are people in this blog that I am sure I don’t like, but I don’t hate them.

And, of course, there are people, literally all over the world that I don’t hate.

You have put your finger on a pathology all right, but it’s the wrong one. People who can’t even conceive that they are disliked are called narcissistic.

I would never diagnose at a distance, but your posts, and attitude towards me, are evidence of narcissism.

I love Canada. If the Tories get in and privatise the NHS, I’m moving there and I’m totally serious.

Wow, that was a pathetic excuse to cover your bigotry.

Frank, in all seriousness, you are everything you hate in me and the people you attack here.

Get psycology help. Maybe one day your family will actually respect you enough to visit and you won’t have to be such a lonely loser.

Anytime.

This is the third time I have made the offer, you lying sack of shit.

Clem, as for my “prejudice” about Canada:

prej·u·dice n. 1. An adverse judgment or opinion formed beforehand or without knowledge or examination of the facts.
2. A preconceived preference or idea.

I’ve been to Canada. I loved it there. I had no adverse judgment in advance. And I certainly have evidence – you are evidence that Canada sucks. Of course, it is always possible that you are truly unique. In that case, I am mistaken. The only arrogant, pretentious, self – absorbed, obnoxious prick in Canada could be you.

In that case, Canada, je vous présente mes excuses.