You: “Indeed it is, as it is mine.”

Yep, it’s your right to avoid any serious intellectual debate, and you do it so well.

So you admit you were wrong. Thanks.

“And this is evidence that I’m to blame?”

You are partially to blame, but this is not evidence to that.

“Or is it evidence that you expect me — like you expected him — to find it acceptable.”

I expect you to stop acting like a little shit if you don’t want to be called a little shit.

“No, CSS, you need to justify your crass behavior.”

I don’t have to justify it, it’s my right.

Suck it up, coward, cause your whining doesn’t work on me.

You really do need to play the victim here, don’t you?

No, CSS, you need to justify your crass behavior.

No I didn’t.

“You came from out of nowhere, and zeroed in on me.”

No I didn’t. I came to this Blog cause I liked Oliver’s writing style.

I knew nothing of you when I first started posting here, in fact, for the first week or so, I didn’t even pay attention to your handle and didn’t know when people said the name Frank it was the same person as fd10801.

But I have since learned that you were, ‘attacked’ by numerous people before I showed up. The only commonality between this people is you. So maybe you are part of the issue. Maybe you act in a way to draw attacks so you can feel like a victim.

“little? NOTHING! Nothing to do with me!
I already know you are responding to my statements. If I say tomato, you say “not tomato”. That’s the nature of a disagreement. But if I say tomato, and you say, “Not tomato — you shit eating scum bag”, that’s something different, don’t you think?”

That’s not how it went.

You: Tomatoe.
Me: Tomato. The, ‘e’ at the end only gets added if it is plural.
You: It’s tomatoe, why don’t you look it up in a dictionary.
Me: No it isn’t, you moron.
You: HOW DARE YOU INSULT ME!!!!

“The fact that there are self – deprecating remarks about you at some obscure URL says nothing about your willingness to admit”

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.startrek.vs.starwars/msg/4e2064a61d76adff?hl=en&

“inappropriate, unwarranted insulting remarks about me, and then blame me for them”

You really do need to play the victim here, don’t you?

That wasn’t my idea, and I didn’t volunteer to take your “gut shots”. There are people on this blog who treat me like crap. I know who they are, and I know why. You came from out of nowhere, and zeroed in on me.

… the nature of my responses, the insults, the profanity, and the general nastiness has little to do with you.

little? NOTHING! Nothing to do with me!
I already know you are responding to my statements. If I say tomato, you say “not tomato”. That’s the nature of a disagreement. But if I say tomato, and you say, “Not tomato — you shit eating scum bag”, that’s something different, don’t you think?

The fact that there are self – deprecating remarks about you at some obscure URL says nothing about your willingness to admit that you make inappropriate, unwarranted insulting remarks about me, and then blame me for them

Now, would you please admit that you decided, almost immediately upon arrival, that your goal was to prove to yourself that you could drive me off this blog?

And, I’m sure that in the rough and tumble world of Internet entertainment writing, I must come off as a wimp, asking that you simply call out a warning before you fire a “gut shot”.

I’m much smarter than you.
I’m not scared of a little bad language.
I don’t think I’m too good to deliver a gut shot in a debate.
I don’t complain when someone returns the favor.

I’m sure I could think of others.

“and you follow it up with pathological protestations to the effect that ‘I made you do it.’”

I never said that, you lying asshole. Fuck, are you really this stupid or is it debating tactic? Do you act stupid until someone insults you so you can pretend to be the victim? That would explain a whole lot about you.

The essence of my response is dictated by what you write, it would have to be otherwise it wouldn’t be a conversation. For instance, if you hadn’t brought up the right’s illusionary rejection of anti-Semitism, I wouldn’t have brought up William Donohue, (whom I mistakenly referred to as James Donohue). That said, the nature of my responses, the insults, the profanity, and the general nastiness has little to do with you.

If you still don’t get it, then I have no idea how to explain it clearer without using pictures.

“You can’t admit that you’re a rotten, selfish prick with no manners, because that’s too unpleasant even for you to admit, especially in front of others.”

http://www.daltonator.net/fuq/search.php?code=strowbridge&author=&quote=asshole

Now, would you please admit you are either a fucking liar or a fucking moron?

“Because there is nothing about you that you have ever exhibited that makes that possibility workable.”

Oh take your crying elsewhere, you ignorant shit. No one’s buying it anymore.

You know the difference between you and me?
I know when I am being mean, and I know that it is not right. I don’t pretend that mean behavior is justified by others, even when I “retaliate”.

You, on the other hand, are mean – spirited and insulting without being provoked, and you follow it up with pathological protestations to the effect that “I made you do it.”

So you know who thinks they’re a victim here?

You.

Because you’re the one forced into ill mannered and inconsiderate and uncouth behavior by me.

You can’t admit that you’re a rotten, selfish prick with no manners, because that’s too unpleasant even for you to admit, especially in front of others.

You’ll come up with some oh – so – clever answer, but it won’t be a response, and it won’t make you a good person. Because there is nothing about you that you have ever exhibited that makes that possibility workable.

You gotta keep up!

I know enough about conservatives to recognize when they avoid what you say because they can’t defend their own hypocricy.

Immigration is a law and order issue to real conservatives. Rockefeller was the trailblazer in how to deal with the drug problem in New York and America in general. The conservatives feel the IRS and SEC have better things to do than go after tax cheats and corporate abusers.

One doesn’t have to be a “liberal” to recognize the many laws that Bush and company have broke inder the pretext of protecting our freedoms. When faced with a choice of following our nations laws or changing them to fit the times they did neither. They broke them and continue to break them.

Violent crime is on an upward swing the Justice Department is now a guarantor of Republican rule not enforcement of our laws.

Don’t fret though fd10801, Law and Order guy Fred Thompson is on his way to again grab that golden ring as the merry go round passes.

So are you, Frank. But you really do think, deep down, that you are a good person and the victim here.

Well, you’re neither.

Not so much with torture, illegal wiretaps, corporate malefeasance, tax cheats, outing CIA agents during a time of war, ad nauseum.

Because Bush fucked up and you are blaming the liberals for having to fix a problem that your guy created.

Liberals don’t steal your money through taxes and blow it on overpriced government programs that don’t work. But they will have to raise taxes to cover the overpriced government programs that Bush put into place.

Do you get it now or are you truly fucking retarded?

You’re all so caught up in the “If it’s Frank, it must be wrong” reflex, you don’t think, you don’t ask questions, it’s just “Charge!”

Clowns.

chum,you contradicted yourself. If, indeed, Republicans “pick and choose” the laws they want the President to enforce, then why would it upset them that he was disregarding the rule of law?

I think you’re totally wrong, but even if I agreed with you, which part would I agree with?

Of course modern Republican conservatives pick and choose the ones they want hom to enfoece and respect.