when last helicopter fly away usa embassey how long before gun of war go the silent?

Answer: 3 day and then peace more than 30 years among vietnam people. back then time usa govt and control media say the same lying excuse for continue the kill.

special important: not the single viet cong coming for attack amerika during all this thirty year.

now patriotc ameriki man him needing for destroy israeli spy operations in usa start with eliminate neocon spy ops in usa.

also aemriki need for reading: a man called intrepid by william stevenson and inside the company, a cia diary by phillip agee. then ameriki understand why usa media so control, keep ameriki so stupid.

then ameriki becoming the free again, him daughter not to take the LBT (low back tattoo), and becoming the slut for every man even the gang member.

Freedom!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What frauds like Dale Franks fail to understand is that there is an implicit contract between the armed services and policymakers. This contract is that servicemen understand they can be killed or injured in service to the nation. But the contract also means our servicemen will not be needlessly or frivolously sent into harm’s way.

Keyboard Kommandoes don’t understand this; they tend to think that if a kid enlists, he or she is disposable. It doesn’t work that way. Even a “former career NCO in line units” should understand this.

Outsourcing at its finest.

Exactly Nimrod: just because I don’t think the public should have to pay for Johnny Q. Lazy Jr’s 14 cavity fillings on his baby teeth means that I actually want him to die … of spinabiffoda!

*cough*

You’re running in circles, having to waste time knocking down one false assertion after another. Note how you cannot propose (A) without being told that, therefore, you MUST be in favor of (B) (i.e if you want to go after Pakistan, you must be in favor of an Iraq style invasion, ’cause, you know, what other options could there possibly be?).

It never fails, cons cannot approach this discussion honestly, no matter how much they pretend otherwise.

I can hardly believe my own trusty eyes, Farris. Have you written that the Constitution and its amendments are all the federal law we’ll ever need?

Of course Mr. Byrd won’t find any mention of Social Security in the Constitution. Let’s not play silly buggers here: The Constitution does not incorporate the entire Federal Code! There’s absolutely no reason to pretend otherwise–unless you’re one of those “There’s-no-such-thing-as-the-IRS” crackpots.

I doubt it, we do have by far the better healthcare system.

I appreciate that all poor people are “Johnny Q. Lazy” waiting for a free handout. All , what, nearly 50 million of them (below the poverty level and/or without insurance). They’re also probably black or Mexican illegals, I mean, ’cause if we’re piling on and all, why stop at income bracket.

Just because Farris characterizes this country’s health care crisis as a question of propping up a bunch of lazy welfare queens doesn’t mean he doesn’t have compassion for these people, he just doesn’t want to actually have to pay anything to help them. Huge difference Nimrod. H-U-G-E.

If my child gets sick, it’s my responsibility to ensure she gets the proper healthcare.

I’m odd like that, I suppose. Guess it’s because I think that’s something you sign up for when you become a parent.

The government provides plenty of health care for people with low incomes.

Just that alone is expensive, sloppy, and rife with fraud, corruption, racial discrimination and bureaucratic bungling.

More of the same is not viewed as a good thing. And, I would venture to say that the state of the average American’s health is better than that of the average British subject.

Defense? You bet!
Building roads? Absolutely!

Free dental check ups for elementary school kids? Hmmm, unless they’ve passed a 28th Amendment that I don’t know about…

Cash money for everyone who lives past the age of 70? Perhaps Senator Byrd can point me out that clause in his pocket version…

Conservatives, who despise the use of tax money for almost anything, seem incouciant about the government wasting our tax money on a project that is hurting us rather than helping us (Iraq). This is our money they’re spending on this thing, and if we stay in Iraq forever, they’ll be wasting our money forever.

That’s the essential fraudulence of the conservative claim to be anti-big-government, of course; they’re all for big government and government waste as long as it involves the word “war.”