<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Daily Show vs. The MSM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/the-daily-show-vs-the-msm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/the-daily-show-vs-the-msm/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/the-daily-show-vs-the-msm/#comment-72743</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 00:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6160#comment-72743</guid>
		<description>Well I call it a war.  War is hell by definition.  But a disastrous war must be significantly worse than other wars.  This one ain&#039;t - - if you know history.

P word. Get some!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I call it a war.  War is hell by definition.  But a disastrous war must be significantly worse than other wars.  This one ain&#8217;t &#8211; - if you know history.</p>
<p>P word. Get some!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/the-daily-show-vs-the-msm/#comment-72742</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 21:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6160#comment-72742</guid>
		<description>A glorious struggle for our freedoms and our very way of life!!!111!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A glorious struggle for our freedoms and our very way of life!!!111!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: z adura</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/the-daily-show-vs-the-msm/#comment-72741</link>
		<dc:creator>z adura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 22:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6160#comment-72741</guid>
		<description>Dugger, it doesn&#039;t matter what I think about war.  I am asking about accountability.  On that score, I have no doubt that this particular war is too expensive in time, prestige, treasure and life.  I call that a disaster.  What do you call it?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dugger, it doesn&#8217;t matter what I think about war.  I am asking about accountability.  On that score, I have no doubt that this particular war is too expensive in time, prestige, treasure and life.  I call that a disaster.  What do you call it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/the-daily-show-vs-the-msm/#comment-72740</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 22:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6160#comment-72740</guid>
		<description>zadura,  First a quick question and then I&#039;ll answer.  Are all wars disasters?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zadura,  First a quick question and then I&#8217;ll answer.  Are all wars disasters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/the-daily-show-vs-the-msm/#comment-72739</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 18:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6160#comment-72739</guid>
		<description>Boo hoo hoo, Frank. More projection.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boo hoo hoo, Frank. More projection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: z adura</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/the-daily-show-vs-the-msm/#comment-72738</link>
		<dc:creator>z adura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6160#comment-72738</guid>
		<description>Dugger, please tell me under which set of criteria the Iraq War isn&#039;t a disaster.  It has cost about 20X what the architects thought it would cost, lasted probably 3 years beyond when they thought it would end and cost probably about 10X the military lives they thought it would require.    To wit, we may only be half-way through paying and there is only the most remote chance of obtaining the objective of a liberal democracy.

By the way, I have never actually heard a reporter say the &quot;disastrous Iraq war.&quot;  I think that is mostly the voices in your own head.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dugger, please tell me under which set of criteria the Iraq War isn&#8217;t a disaster.  It has cost about 20X what the architects thought it would cost, lasted probably 3 years beyond when they thought it would end and cost probably about 10X the military lives they thought it would require.    To wit, we may only be half-way through paying and there is only the most remote chance of obtaining the objective of a liberal democracy.</p>
<p>By the way, I have never actually heard a reporter say the &#8220;disastrous Iraq war.&#8221;  I think that is mostly the voices in your own head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/the-daily-show-vs-the-msm/#comment-72737</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 14:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6160#comment-72737</guid>
		<description>&quot;it is never about their ideology&#039;

Excellent point.  In fact, the criticism of liberals, which would be portrayed as balance or fairness here, is often from the further left (they aren&#039;t leftist enough0

And excuse me, but Congress is totally Dmeocratic.  The purse sytrings of the country.  Why isn&#039;t the Daily Show all over Democrats like Murtha and Pelosi and Barney frank.  Why?.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it is never about their ideology&#8217;</p>
<p>Excellent point.  In fact, the criticism of liberals, which would be portrayed as balance or fairness here, is often from the further left (they aren&#8217;t leftist enough0</p>
<p>And excuse me, but Congress is totally Dmeocratic.  The purse sytrings of the country.  Why isn&#8217;t the Daily Show all over Democrats like Murtha and Pelosi and Barney frank.  Why?.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Please to Meet You, Hope You Guess My Name</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/the-daily-show-vs-the-msm/#comment-72736</link>
		<dc:creator>Please to Meet You, Hope You Guess My Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 12:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6160#comment-72736</guid>
		<description>Constantine makes a point -- but it&#039;s the wrong one...

What do you think the quotes are for?

I understand the liberal bias very well...

Liberal funny men -- their numbers are legion -- make fun of conservatives&#039; beliefs, their lifestyle, their appearance, all is fair game.

But when the occasional -- excuse me, I mean extremely rare -- joke about a liberal is told, it is never about their ideology. It is never about the disparity between their actions and their words.

No, indeed! It&#039;s about their looks, or some superficial quality.

Conservatives who make fun of liberals are never appreciated by liberals as funny, because being a liberal is serious business.

They&#039;re making the world a better place to live. Nothing funny about that.

They&#039;re ending war and poverty, and making sure everyone gets free health care and higher wages. Nothing funny about that.

Like the Blues Brothers, they&#039;re on a mission from God!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Constantine makes a point &#8212; but it&#8217;s the wrong one&#8230;</p>
<p>What do you think the quotes are for?</p>
<p>I understand the liberal bias very well&#8230;</p>
<p>Liberal funny men &#8212; their numbers are legion &#8212; make fun of conservatives&#8217; beliefs, their lifestyle, their appearance, all is fair game.</p>
<p>But when the occasional &#8212; excuse me, I mean extremely rare &#8212; joke about a liberal is told, it is never about their ideology. It is never about the disparity between their actions and their words.</p>
<p>No, indeed! It&#8217;s about their looks, or some superficial quality.</p>
<p>Conservatives who make fun of liberals are never appreciated by liberals as funny, because being a liberal is serious business.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re making the world a better place to live. Nothing funny about that.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re ending war and poverty, and making sure everyone gets free health care and higher wages. Nothing funny about that.</p>
<p>Like the Blues Brothers, they&#8217;re on a mission from God!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill l.</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/the-daily-show-vs-the-msm/#comment-72735</link>
		<dc:creator>bill l.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 10:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6160#comment-72735</guid>
		<description>The best part about all of this is how merely pointing out the problems with conservative rule auto-magically makes you a liberal.  So hollow is the conservative argument that they  invariably demonize anyone who opposes them with their stock insults.  Take note of how many moderate conservatives are eviscerated the second they oppose Bush.  Why they must be closet liberals!  Pathetically, the MSM has bought into this, which brings us to the modern concept of &quot;balance&quot; in the media.  You simply can&#039;t call a side, and 99% of the time we&#039;re talking about cons, out on their b.s. without them falling back on the fabricated bias charges as fronted, yet again, by Dugger.

As the saying goes, apparently reality has a liberal bias.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best part about all of this is how merely pointing out the problems with conservative rule auto-magically makes you a liberal.  So hollow is the conservative argument that they  invariably demonize anyone who opposes them with their stock insults.  Take note of how many moderate conservatives are eviscerated the second they oppose Bush.  Why they must be closet liberals!  Pathetically, the MSM has bought into this, which brings us to the modern concept of &#8220;balance&#8221; in the media.  You simply can&#8217;t call a side, and 99% of the time we&#8217;re talking about cons, out on their b.s. without them falling back on the fabricated bias charges as fronted, yet again, by Dugger.</p>
<p>As the saying goes, apparently reality has a liberal bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constantine</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/the-daily-show-vs-the-msm/#comment-72734</link>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 02:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6160#comment-72734</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;We all &quot;know&quot; that &quot;conservatives aren&#039;t funny&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

To a degree, this is the essence of conservatism. When conservatism gravitates to its natural, stodgy small-c &quot;conservative&quot; state, they&#039;re not funny and vaguely mockable. When conservatives try to be funny and hip, then they become a hilarious farce. Not so much &quot;funny ha-ha&quot; but more &quot;falling-down-the-stairs funny.&quot;

If they just tried to stay stodgy, then yeah, &quot;making fun of the conservative square&quot; would get dull after a while. But as Zython points out, conservatives seem to insist on producing new hilarious material that makes laughing and ridiculing conservatives funny in new and different ways day after day.

That and your politicians lie bald-faced to the camera contradicting exactly what you said the day before, giving the Daily Show great clips. So  I&#039;d stop that if I were you.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>We all &#8220;know&#8221; that &#8220;conservatives aren&#8217;t funny&#8221;</i></p>
<p>To a degree, this is the essence of conservatism. When conservatism gravitates to its natural, stodgy small-c &#8220;conservative&#8221; state, they&#8217;re not funny and vaguely mockable. When conservatives try to be funny and hip, then they become a hilarious farce. Not so much &#8220;funny ha-ha&#8221; but more &#8220;falling-down-the-stairs funny.&#8221;</p>
<p>If they just tried to stay stodgy, then yeah, &#8220;making fun of the conservative square&#8221; would get dull after a while. But as Zython points out, conservatives seem to insist on producing new hilarious material that makes laughing and ridiculing conservatives funny in new and different ways day after day.</p>
<p>That and your politicians lie bald-faced to the camera contradicting exactly what you said the day before, giving the Daily Show great clips. So  I&#8217;d stop that if I were you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zython</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/the-daily-show-vs-the-msm/#comment-72733</link>
		<dc:creator>Zython</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 01:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6160#comment-72733</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;We all &quot;know&quot; that &quot;conservatives aren&#039;t funny&quot; which means that all comics can ridicule conservatives with impunity. As dugger points out, that makes for a dull show, after a while.&lt;/i&gt;

Or it would be, were it not for you guys constantly giving us fresh material.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>We all &#8220;know&#8221; that &#8220;conservatives aren&#8217;t funny&#8221; which means that all comics can ridicule conservatives with impunity. As dugger points out, that makes for a dull show, after a while.</i></p>
<p>Or it would be, were it not for you guys constantly giving us fresh material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/the-daily-show-vs-the-msm/#comment-72732</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 00:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6160#comment-72732</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;For instance, the report speaks of the disastrous Iraq war - as if that is a given. &lt;/i&gt;

Dugger, per usual, is spot on here. The Iraq War is objectively totally awesome, and no amount of [non-Fox] MSM bull-jive will ever change that. If only those MSMs (like the NYTimes and WaPo), who have always hated this awesome war, would just start reporting the good things happening over there (clap louder or leave the country!!)...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>For instance, the report speaks of the disastrous Iraq war &#8211; as if that is a given. </i></p>
<p>Dugger, per usual, is spot on here. The Iraq War is objectively totally awesome, and no amount of [non-Fox] MSM bull-jive will ever change that. If only those MSMs (like the NYTimes and WaPo), who have always hated this awesome war, would just start reporting the good things happening over there (clap louder or leave the country!!)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nimrod Gently</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/the-daily-show-vs-the-msm/#comment-72731</link>
		<dc:creator>Nimrod Gently</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 23:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6160#comment-72731</guid>
		<description>Satirical topical comedy programmes will always naturally target the current government above the opposition. You have to be particularly dense to translate that into the Daily Show being a far-left propaganda tool.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Satirical topical comedy programmes will always naturally target the current government above the opposition. You have to be particularly dense to translate that into the Daily Show being a far-left propaganda tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberal Bias? What Liberal Bias?</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/the-daily-show-vs-the-msm/#comment-72730</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberal Bias? What Liberal Bias?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 23:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6160#comment-72730</guid>
		<description>Nimrod Gently: I am not stupid, and you are agreeing with me, aren&#039;t you?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nimrod Gently: I am not stupid, and you are agreeing with me, aren&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nimrod Gently</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/the-daily-show-vs-the-msm/#comment-72729</link>
		<dc:creator>Nimrod Gently</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 23:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6160#comment-72729</guid>
		<description>&quot;There is even more targeting of the right, and conservatives, and Republicans, on the Daily Show, than there is in the MSM.&quot;

Because a)  the news (note: not the same as &quot;comedy programmes&quot;) are terrified of displaying anything resembling Liberal Bias because of all the crybabies on the right, and b) &lt;i&gt;the Republicans are the ones in charge, stupid&lt;/i&gt;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There is even more targeting of the right, and conservatives, and Republicans, on the Daily Show, than there is in the MSM.&#8221;</p>
<p>Because a)  the news (note: not the same as &#8220;comedy programmes&#8221;) are terrified of displaying anything resembling Liberal Bias because of all the crybabies on the right, and b) <i>the Republicans are the ones in charge, stupid</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilbur</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/the-daily-show-vs-the-msm/#comment-72728</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 23:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6160#comment-72728</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;we already know they are hugely, disproportionately leftist.&lt;/i&gt;

&quot;we&quot; being the entire population of the duggerverse which, as the last six years have shown, bears only a nodding acquaintance with what most of us humans call &quot;reality&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>we already know they are hugely, disproportionately leftist.</i></p>
<p>&#8220;we&#8221; being the entire population of the duggerverse which, as the last six years have shown, bears only a nodding acquaintance with what most of us humans call &#8220;reality&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rheinhard</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/the-daily-show-vs-the-msm/#comment-72727</link>
		<dc:creator>Rheinhard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 22:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6160#comment-72727</guid>
		<description>&quot;That rotten John Stewart has been too mean to conservatives only because they have been running every aspect of government for six years!&quot;

It has nothing to do with &quot;conservatives not being funny&quot; (though, in general, I think that is more true than not), it has to do with finding the truth where it lies.  In a system entirely run by one party, it is kinda hard to pick on the people who control nothing.  Which is fundamentally the same reason why conservatives aren&#039;t funny, and why the Daily SHow trumps so much of MSM journalism (which is only &quot;liberally biased&quot; in the fevered imaginations of the Freeperati).

I think it was H.L. Mencken who said the purpose of journalism is to &quot;comfort the afflicted, and afflict the comfortable.&quot;  Most right wing comics and journalists alike seem to turn this completely around, focusing on how best to tell those on the top that they&#039;re great and they deserve what they have, and the schlubs at the bottom deserve to be where they are, the lazy slackers.

Further, as Paul Krugman has observed, the ridiculous obsession with &quot;balance&quot; has led far too many journos and pundits, when talking to 2 experts about the shape of the earth, one saying it&#039;s round and the other flat, to title the story &quot;Shape of the Earth: Opinions Differ&quot;.  Sorry, no, one opinion is objectively right and the other wrong, and it isn&#039;t &quot;bias&quot; to say so.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That rotten John Stewart has been too mean to conservatives only because they have been running every aspect of government for six years!&#8221;</p>
<p>It has nothing to do with &#8220;conservatives not being funny&#8221; (though, in general, I think that is more true than not), it has to do with finding the truth where it lies.  In a system entirely run by one party, it is kinda hard to pick on the people who control nothing.  Which is fundamentally the same reason why conservatives aren&#8217;t funny, and why the Daily SHow trumps so much of MSM journalism (which is only &#8220;liberally biased&#8221; in the fevered imaginations of the Freeperati).</p>
<p>I think it was H.L. Mencken who said the purpose of journalism is to &#8220;comfort the afflicted, and afflict the comfortable.&#8221;  Most right wing comics and journalists alike seem to turn this completely around, focusing on how best to tell those on the top that they&#8217;re great and they deserve what they have, and the schlubs at the bottom deserve to be where they are, the lazy slackers.</p>
<p>Further, as Paul Krugman has observed, the ridiculous obsession with &#8220;balance&#8221; has led far too many journos and pundits, when talking to 2 experts about the shape of the earth, one saying it&#8217;s round and the other flat, to title the story &#8220;Shape of the Earth: Opinions Differ&#8221;.  Sorry, no, one opinion is objectively right and the other wrong, and it isn&#8217;t &#8220;bias&#8221; to say so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/the-daily-show-vs-the-msm/#comment-72726</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 22:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6160#comment-72726</guid>
		<description>Because objective reality is not balanced, Dugger. If I say George Bush eats babies and you say George Bush cures cancer, the media should not report both as &quot;sides&quot; of an issue because neither claim is true. Cons have worked this so hard into the media they report both sides to an issue when there isn&#039;t, and that errs on the side of conservatives.

The Daily Show is an admittedly liberal show, but as I&#039;ve pointed out before, when Dems deserve they get it as good as Cons do (ask the Clintons, Al Gore, John Kerry or Howard Dean among others if the Daily Show lampooned them or not), and the show is better for it. Nobody wants to watch a hack show that exists only to prop up one side (see The Half Hour News Hour) because that violates the first law of comedy: be funny.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because objective reality is not balanced, Dugger. If I say George Bush eats babies and you say George Bush cures cancer, the media should not report both as &#8220;sides&#8221; of an issue because neither claim is true. Cons have worked this so hard into the media they report both sides to an issue when there isn&#8217;t, and that errs on the side of conservatives.</p>
<p>The Daily Show is an admittedly liberal show, but as I&#8217;ve pointed out before, when Dems deserve they get it as good as Cons do (ask the Clintons, Al Gore, John Kerry or Howard Dean among others if the Daily Show lampooned them or not), and the show is better for it. Nobody wants to watch a hack show that exists only to prop up one side (see The Half Hour News Hour) because that violates the first law of comedy: be funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberal Bias? What Liberal Bias?</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/the-daily-show-vs-the-msm/#comment-72725</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberal Bias? What Liberal Bias?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 22:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6160#comment-72725</guid>
		<description>There is even more targeting of the right, and conservatives, and Republicans, on the Daily Show, than there is in the MSM.

We all &quot;know&quot; that &quot;conservatives aren&#039;t funny&quot; which means that all comics can ridicule conservatives with impunity. As dugger points out, that makes for a dull show, after a while.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is even more targeting of the right, and conservatives, and Republicans, on the Daily Show, than there is in the MSM.</p>
<p>We all &#8220;know&#8221; that &#8220;conservatives aren&#8217;t funny&#8221; which means that all comics can ridicule conservatives with impunity. As dugger points out, that makes for a dull show, after a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/the-daily-show-vs-the-msm/#comment-72724</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 22:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6160#comment-72724</guid>
		<description>The huge problem is that without that disparaged emphasis on balance (which isn&#039;t working anyway - the MSM is overwhelmingly liberal), there would be no check, no governing of the inherent personal biases of the reporters/analysts - and we already know they are hugely, disproportionately leftist.

For instance, the report speaks of the disastrous Iraq war - as if that is a given.  If you argue all wars are disastrous -fine-, but how is Iraq more disastrous than Vietnam, WWII etc.

My &#039;solution&#039;: half left/half right.  Each calls it like they see it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The huge problem is that without that disparaged emphasis on balance (which isn&#8217;t working anyway &#8211; the MSM is overwhelmingly liberal), there would be no check, no governing of the inherent personal biases of the reporters/analysts &#8211; and we already know they are hugely, disproportionately leftist.</p>
<p>For instance, the report speaks of the disastrous Iraq war &#8211; as if that is a given.  If you argue all wars are disastrous -fine-, but how is Iraq more disastrous than Vietnam, WWII etc.</p>
<p>My &#8216;solution&#8217;: half left/half right.  Each calls it like they see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

