<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Con Blogs Ain&#8217;t Getting No Love</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/con-blogs-aint-getting-no-love/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/con-blogs-aint-getting-no-love/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Xanthippas</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/con-blogs-aint-getting-no-love/#comment-72710</link>
		<dc:creator>Xanthippas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6155#comment-72710</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t make a habit of regularly reading right-wing blogs, but from what I&#039;ve seen, they all repeat the same talking points, they rarely argue with each other about issues of substance, they tend to say outrageous things that the &quot;average&quot; American would probably not agree with (about war and torture, specifically) and there&#039;s little actual &quot;debate&quot; amongst them or among their commentators. So, since they offer no new ideas but only parrot the ideas of more well-known pundits, why should Republicans pay attention to them? They&#039;ve got nothing to offer.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t make a habit of regularly reading right-wing blogs, but from what I&#8217;ve seen, they all repeat the same talking points, they rarely argue with each other about issues of substance, they tend to say outrageous things that the &#8220;average&#8221; American would probably not agree with (about war and torture, specifically) and there&#8217;s little actual &#8220;debate&#8221; amongst them or among their commentators. So, since they offer no new ideas but only parrot the ideas of more well-known pundits, why should Republicans pay attention to them? They&#8217;ve got nothing to offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wellstone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/con-blogs-aint-getting-no-love/#comment-72709</link>
		<dc:creator>Wellstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 15:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6155#comment-72709</guid>
		<description>When there IS a comment section.

The largest con blogs offer no way to comment, or censor and delete liberal posts.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When there IS a comment section.</p>
<p>The largest con blogs offer no way to comment, or censor and delete liberal posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: merlallen</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/22/con-blogs-aint-getting-no-love/#comment-72708</link>
		<dc:creator>merlallen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 12:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6155#comment-72708</guid>
		<description>How could anyone take them seriously after reading one of their comment sections?
Frank makes them look smart and manly.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could anyone take them seriously after reading one of their comment sections?<br />
Frank makes them look smart and manly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

