<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Republican Problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/15/the-republican-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/15/the-republican-problem/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Thad</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/15/the-republican-problem/#comment-73310</link>
		<dc:creator>Thad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6223#comment-73310</guid>
		<description>&quot;...how is the eventual Republican nominee to trick America into voting for him as a mainstream candidate after months of out-conservative-ing each other?&quot;

That&#039;s actually something I find extremely intriguing: the qualities that win a general election are often not the same ones that win a primary, and primary voters find themselves trying to vote for someone who has the best set of qualities they support without going too far off to the fringe.  In game theory this is called &quot;minimaxing&quot; and if I ever go back to school I think it would make a great topic to write a thesis on.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;how is the eventual Republican nominee to trick America into voting for him as a mainstream candidate after months of out-conservative-ing each other?&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s actually something I find extremely intriguing: the qualities that win a general election are often not the same ones that win a primary, and primary voters find themselves trying to vote for someone who has the best set of qualities they support without going too far off to the fringe.  In game theory this is called &#8220;minimaxing&#8221; and if I ever go back to school I think it would make a great topic to write a thesis on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wellstone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/15/the-republican-problem/#comment-73309</link>
		<dc:creator>Wellstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 16:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6223#comment-73309</guid>
		<description>No problem.  Let&#039;s encourage them to become even MORE &quot;Conservative&quot;!!

The candidates will then be fighting over ... lesseee...  28&amp; of the electorate?

The National Elections will no longer be 50-50, but 70-30 Dem wins come next November.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem.  Let&#8217;s encourage them to become even MORE &#8220;Conservative&#8221;!!</p>
<p>The candidates will then be fighting over &#8230; lesseee&#8230;  28&#038; of the electorate?</p>
<p>The National Elections will no longer be 50-50, but 70-30 Dem wins come next November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

