<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain Betrays The Cons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/14/mccain-betrays-the-cons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/14/mccain-betrays-the-cons/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/14/mccain-betrays-the-cons/#comment-73491</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 16:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6237#comment-73491</guid>
		<description>They could certainly 'try', it doesn't mean they are. I could try to be the best golfer in the world every day, but I was a spectator at the TPC this weekend, not a participant.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They could certainly &#8216;try&#8217;, it doesn&#8217;t mean they are. I could try to be the best golfer in the world every day, but I was a spectator at the TPC this weekend, not a participant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/14/mccain-betrays-the-cons/#comment-73490</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 15:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6237#comment-73490</guid>
		<description>"An assertion that it has been provenn that global warming is predominantly man-made and that that science is fully settled would not seem like bias to them."

It depends on how you define predominantly; I think most scientists wouldn't use that particular word. However, the rest of your statement is 100% correct.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;An assertion that it has been provenn that global warming is predominantly man-made and that that science is fully settled would not seem like bias to them.&#8221;</p>
<p>It depends on how you define predominantly; I think most scientists wouldn&#8217;t use that particular word. However, the rest of your statement is 100% correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/14/mccain-betrays-the-cons/#comment-73489</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 14:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6237#comment-73489</guid>
		<description>Don't know if I would agree with McCain's number, but I also believe most reporters try to be and think their reporting is unbiased.  Its not, though.  they are blind to the bias.  An assertion that it has been provenn that global warming is predominantly man-made and that that science is fully settled would not seem like bias to them.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know if I would agree with McCain&#8217;s number, but I also believe most reporters try to be and think their reporting is unbiased.  Its not, though.  they are blind to the bias.  An assertion that it has been provenn that global warming is predominantly man-made and that that science is fully settled would not seem like bias to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
