<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Energy Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/07/energy-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/07/energy-politics/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:43:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: midderpidge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/07/energy-politics/#comment-100004</link>
		<dc:creator>midderpidge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6288#comment-100004</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it&#039;s a job saving measure more than a fuel efficiency matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s a job saving measure more than a fuel efficiency matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/07/energy-politics/#comment-74330</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 23:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6288#comment-74330</guid>
		<description>Thanks, SaveFarris.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Obama would encourage automakers to make fuel-efficient hybrid vehicles by helping the companies shoulder the health care costs of their retirees. Domestic automakers will get health care assistance in exchange for investing 50 percent of the savings into technology to produce more fuel-efficient vehicles.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s probably the dumbest idea I&#039;ve read in a long time.

If the Big 3 automakers are going to be able to shoulder the legacy cost of retiree benefits, then they need to become profitable first.  Pouring government money into Big 3 health insurance costs will only make unions demand more health insurance coverage, because the government is paying for it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, SaveFarris.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Obama would encourage automakers to make fuel-efficient hybrid vehicles by helping the companies shoulder the health care costs of their retirees. Domestic automakers will get health care assistance in exchange for investing 50 percent of the savings into technology to produce more fuel-efficient vehicles.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s probably the dumbest idea I&#8217;ve read in a long time.</p>
<p>If the Big 3 automakers are going to be able to shoulder the legacy cost of retiree benefits, then they need to become profitable first.  Pouring government money into Big 3 health insurance costs will only make unions demand more health insurance coverage, because the government is paying for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaveFarris</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/07/energy-politics/#comment-74329</link>
		<dc:creator>SaveFarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 16:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6288#comment-74329</guid>
		<description>&quot;Strong Ties&quot;?  Geez, if having strong ties were proof enough of criminal mischief, then why no fuss over Harry Reid&#039;s land deal, Pelosi&#039;s land deal, DiFi&#039;s appropriations, or the  Clinton China connections?

So somebody, maybe even somebody who works for the President knows, is making money.  If the Goverment wasn&#039;t making 3X as much in profit from gas taxes, I might be just as worked up as you.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Strong Ties&#8221;?  Geez, if having strong ties were proof enough of criminal mischief, then why no fuss over Harry Reid&#8217;s land deal, Pelosi&#8217;s land deal, DiFi&#8217;s appropriations, or the  Clinton China connections?</p>
<p>So somebody, maybe even somebody who works for the President knows, is making money.  If the Goverment wasn&#8217;t making 3X as much in profit from gas taxes, I might be just as worked up as you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/07/energy-politics/#comment-74328</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 02:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6288#comment-74328</guid>
		<description>&quot;I certainly didn&#039;t realize that talking about Obama&#039;s plan would be OT in a post about Obama&#039;s plan. My apoligies.&quot;

Did you miss this part?

&quot;Therefore, your complaint was, at best, unfocused.&quot;

&quot;As for your contribution, I&#039;d take your &quot;less gas&quot; goal more seriously if your side (if not you specifically) wasn&#039;t so up in arms about current gas prices.&quot;

It&#039;s not gas prices by themselves that&#039;s the problem. It&#039;s gas prices plus record profit for an industry that the Bush administration has strong ties to.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I certainly didn&#8217;t realize that talking about Obama&#8217;s plan would be OT in a post about Obama&#8217;s plan. My apoligies.&#8221;</p>
<p>Did you miss this part?</p>
<p>&#8220;Therefore, your complaint was, at best, unfocused.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;As for your contribution, I&#8217;d take your &#8220;less gas&#8221; goal more seriously if your side (if not you specifically) wasn&#8217;t so up in arms about current gas prices.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not gas prices by themselves that&#8217;s the problem. It&#8217;s gas prices plus record profit for an industry that the Bush administration has strong ties to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaveFarris</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/07/energy-politics/#comment-74327</link>
		<dc:creator>SaveFarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 16:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6288#comment-74327</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t complaining about Oliver, at first.  I was commenting on Obama&#039;s plan itself.  I certainly didn&#039;t realize that talking about Obama&#039;s plan would be OT in a post about Obama&#039;s plan.  My apoligies.

As for your contribution, I&#039;d take your &quot;less gas&quot; goal more seriously if your side (if not you specifically) wasn&#039;t so up in arms about current gas prices.  The ONLY way to reach your &quot;less gas&quot; goal is for gas to price itself out of the market.  You should be doing cartwheels over recent  prices.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t complaining about Oliver, at first.  I was commenting on Obama&#8217;s plan itself.  I certainly didn&#8217;t realize that talking about Obama&#8217;s plan would be OT in a post about Obama&#8217;s plan.  My apoligies.</p>
<p>As for your contribution, I&#8217;d take your &#8220;less gas&#8221; goal more seriously if your side (if not you specifically) wasn&#8217;t so up in arms about current gas prices.  The ONLY way to reach your &#8220;less gas&#8221; goal is for gas to price itself out of the market.  You should be doing cartwheels over recent  prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/07/energy-politics/#comment-74326</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 06:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6288#comment-74326</guid>
		<description>&quot;Obama. Did you read what you linked to?!? Bullet Point #3 my friend.&quot;

Two points:

1.) OW complained about a lack of a central plan for Oil independence in Obama&#039;s plan, (and all politicians plans so far). Therefore, your complaint was, at best, unfocused.

2.) Any chance you are going to respond to my post? Or are you going to ignore the real issue with the energy plan?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Obama. Did you read what you linked to?!? Bullet Point #3 my friend.&#8221;</p>
<p>Two points:</p>
<p>1.) OW complained about a lack of a central plan for Oil independence in Obama&#8217;s plan, (and all politicians plans so far). Therefore, your complaint was, at best, unfocused.</p>
<p>2.) Any chance you are going to respond to my post? Or are you going to ignore the real issue with the energy plan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/07/energy-politics/#comment-74325</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 16:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6288#comment-74325</guid>
		<description>We don&#039;t need a Manhattan or Apollo project.  The technology already exists.  Rent &quot;Who killed the Electric Car?&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don&#8217;t need a Manhattan or Apollo project.  The technology already exists.  Rent &#8220;Who killed the Electric Car?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaveFarris</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/07/energy-politics/#comment-74324</link>
		<dc:creator>SaveFarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 13:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6288#comment-74324</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who said anything about spending money on health care?&lt;/i&gt;

Obama.  Did you read what you linked to?!?  Bullet Point #3 my friend.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who said anything about spending money on health care?</i></p>
<p>Obama.  Did you read what you linked to?!?  Bullet Point #3 my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/07/energy-politics/#comment-74323</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 09:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6288#comment-74323</guid>
		<description>&quot;How about directing those funds towards building more refineries?&quot;

How about letting the oil companies making record profits build the refineries.

Meanwhile, we can kill all their subsidies and help fund energy efficiency and oil independence projects.

After all, the goal isn&#039;t cheap gas, it&#039;s using less gas.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How about directing those funds towards building more refineries?&#8221;</p>
<p>How about letting the oil companies making record profits build the refineries.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, we can kill all their subsidies and help fund energy efficiency and oil independence projects.</p>
<p>After all, the goal isn&#8217;t cheap gas, it&#8217;s using less gas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/07/energy-politics/#comment-74322</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 02:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6288#comment-74322</guid>
		<description>Who said anything about spending money on health care? Can you read at all?

I said: &quot;We need something ... that we will find a fuel alternative and we will move the heavens to make it happen&quot;

HOW IN GOD&#039;S NAME DID YOU GET &quot;HEALTH CARE&quot; OUT OF THAT?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who said anything about spending money on health care? Can you read at all?</p>
<p>I said: &#8220;We need something &#8230; that we will find a fuel alternative and we will move the heavens to make it happen&#8221;</p>
<p>HOW IN GOD&#8217;S NAME DID YOU GET &#8220;HEALTH CARE&#8221; OUT OF THAT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaveFarris</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/07/energy-politics/#comment-74321</link>
		<dc:creator>SaveFarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 01:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6288#comment-74321</guid>
		<description>Energy independence by more government spending on health care?  Um... no.

How about directing those funds towards building more refineries?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Energy independence by more government spending on health care?  Um&#8230; no.</p>
<p>How about directing those funds towards building more refineries?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fd10801</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/07/energy-politics/#comment-74320</link>
		<dc:creator>fd10801</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 00:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6288#comment-74320</guid>
		<description>We need a President who can &lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt; &quot;nuclear&quot;; not just say it!

President Carter couldn&#039;t say &quot;nuclear&quot;, and he worked with Adm. Rickover!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need a President who can <i>do</i> &#8220;nuclear&#8221;; not just say it!</p>
<p>President Carter couldn&#8217;t say &#8220;nuclear&#8221;, and he worked with Adm. Rickover!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
