We Are Ruled By A Stupid Child

5:55 pm EST May 2nd, 2007 | News | 26 Comments

I catch a lot of flack for wallowing in arrested development (I love cereal, comic books, cartoons and video games and will until I go into retirement and probably past then) but you know, I expect something resembling maturity from the leader of the free world.

Topic:

Related Posts

«
»

26 Responses to “We Are Ruled By A Stupid Child”

  1. Wilbur says:
    May 2, 2007 at 6:00 pm

    I gotta say, Dakota Fanning for president is looking less and less ridiculous with each passing day.

  2. Nimrod Gently says:
    May 2, 2007 at 6:28 pm

    By the way, in the report it said, it is — the government may have to put in more troops to be able to get to that position. And that’s what we do. We put in more troops to get to a position where we can be in some other place. The question is, who ought to make that decision? The Congress or the commanders? And as you know, my position is clear — I’m the commander guy.

    Inasmuch as I can follow that, it seems as though he’s questioning the very concept of anyone questioning his authority and/or decisions.

  3. Squirrel says:
    May 2, 2007 at 6:53 pm

    The thought that it’s a perfectly articulated point to Frank is thoroughly entertaining.

    “commander guy” …?!

  4. C.S.Strowbridge says:
    May 2, 2007 at 8:15 pm

    At this point I hope he’s back on the sauce, there’s no other way to explain this.

  5. Duder says:
    May 2, 2007 at 9:25 pm

    What a dumb-ass.

    He’s Commander Bunnypants, for fuck’s sake.

  6. fd10801 says:
    May 2, 2007 at 11:35 pm

    Hey, squirrel, the fact that this is amusing to guys who thought that a grown – assed man with teen – aged hormones (he even wore briefs, for cripes’ sakes!) was the greatest President in history — now that’s thoroughly entertaining…

    But, please, do go on…

  7. Squirrel says:
    May 2, 2007 at 11:39 pm

    Shorter Frank: LOOK, shiny light — over there!!!

  8. fd10801 says:
    May 3, 2007 at 12:33 am

    Squirrel: Did I run over your dog, shit for brains?

    I wasn’t even interested in this dopey thread, but, NOOOOoooooo! You have to come along and make an idiotic remark.

    Now you want to compound the felony?

    Why didn’t you quit while you were only somewhat behind… ?

  9. Squirrel says:
    May 3, 2007 at 1:28 am

    Poor, poor victimized Frank.

  10. fd10801 says:
    May 3, 2007 at 6:34 am

    squirrel, you’re an a**hole.

  11. merlallen says:
    May 3, 2007 at 7:02 am

    I can’t wait for the day when he holds his breath until he turns blue, then lays on the floor and has a tantrum. He is a big fucking crybaby, just like all conservatives.

  12. merlallen says:
    May 3, 2007 at 7:04 am

    frank is a good example and the pee doctor is another.

  13. C.S.Strowbridge says:
    May 3, 2007 at 7:14 am

    Frankly Out of His Mind: “squirrel, you’re an a**hole.”

    I remember a time when you attacked my for calling you bad names. Several times in fact. Why have you changed your tune? While we’re at it, I seem to remember you saying you were leaving this place and never coming back. That might be a good plan, cause you are not cut out for this blog. I’ve seen people torn up by more than one Internet community they were not mentally strong enough to endure.

    On a side note, using asterisks instead of the, ‘ss’ in asshole isn’t any better than just typing asshole. All it does is make you look like a puritan hypocrite.

  14. fd10801 says:
    May 3, 2007 at 7:40 am

    Thanks for reminding me, CSS.

    Squirrel is an asshole, and so are you.

    And I’m sure this means nothing to you, coming from the land of Aristocracy and all, but he insulted me, for absolutely no reason. I insulted him back.

    Is that upsetting to you? That get f*ckin’ fuckin’ lost!

  15. Nimrod Gently says:
    May 3, 2007 at 8:09 am

    Canada is the land of Aristocracy?

    This probably isn’t important, but “he even wore briefs, for cripes’ sakes!”

    What the hell? Do real men only go commando or something?

  16. fd10801 says:
    May 3, 2007 at 8:46 am

    This probably isn’t important
    You are, at long last, correct.

  17. Nimrod Gently says:
    May 3, 2007 at 12:09 pm

    So it was completely meaningless? “He even wore briefs”? As if it’s somehow…god knows what the implication is? You were just talking absolute bollocks?

  18. fd10801 says:
    May 3, 2007 at 1:57 pm

    Whatever you say is completely meaningless.

    Were you confused?

    I’m sorry.

  19. Nimrod Gently says:
    May 3, 2007 at 3:04 pm

    I’m just glad you find Clinton’s underwear so amusing.

  20. frameone says:
    May 3, 2007 at 5:32 pm

    “Whatever you say is completely meaningless.”

    omg, rofl. Does it also bounce off you and stick to him, frank?

    Perfect alt title for this thread:”We are ruled by a stupid child, supported by stupid children.”

  21. fd10801 says:
    May 3, 2007 at 6:13 pm

    How about, “When Frameone shows up, let’s all go home.”

    The next time you’re r’ing o the f, l’ing, watch out you don’t get roach s up your nose.

  22. Nimrod Gently says:
    May 3, 2007 at 7:38 pm

    I think I realise what you meant now anyway. We just call ‘em pants in this country but you call ‘em Boxers and Briefs. So real men wear boxers and sissy ponces wear regliar underpants. I get it.

  23. Anonymous says:
    May 3, 2007 at 8:54 pm

    frank you’re just awesome. totally awesome.

  24. fd10801 says:
    May 3, 2007 at 9:00 pm

    Close, NG… Children wear briefs, then when young men get older, around college age, they start wearing boxers.

    Thank you so much, Mr.Pipeline!

  25. frameone says:
    May 4, 2007 at 2:11 pm

    frank is totally going to respond to this comment.

  26. C.S.Strowbridge says:
    May 6, 2007 at 10:22 pm

    “frank is totally going to respond to this comment.”

    I can’t believe he’s arguing about boxers or briefs. Clearly this is some how my fault for taunting him.