<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Common Feature In Bush&#8217;s Only Two Vetoes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/01/the-common-feature-in-bushs-only-two-vetoes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/01/the-common-feature-in-bushs-only-two-vetoes/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: fd10801</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/01/the-common-feature-in-bushs-only-two-vetoes/#comment-75213</link>
		<dc:creator>fd10801</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 05:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6339#comment-75213</guid>
		<description>I hope so, Oliver.

I wasn't insinuating anything, Quaker. My take on it was clear. It's you, and more often, other posters, who think I'm the Delegate from Conservatismia, and you ask me to explain every statement from Justinian to Hannity.

What I said was simple enough: The idea that Pres. Bush can do nothing positive is a part of BDS.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope so, Oliver.</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t insinuating anything, Quaker. My take on it was clear. It&#8217;s you, and more often, other posters, who think I&#8217;m the Delegate from Conservatismia, and you ask me to explain every statement from Justinian to Hannity.</p>
<p>What I said was simple enough: The idea that Pres. Bush can do nothing positive is a part of BDS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/01/the-common-feature-in-bushs-only-two-vetoes/#comment-75212</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 04:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6339#comment-75212</guid>
		<description>Here is one of the things you guys - especially Marty - need to understand about this fricking blog.

I say what I think. Not what somebody wants me to, not what I want you to, but what I think. If I think someone is an asshole I say it, if I think they aren't, I say it. No double-super-secret messages to decode.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is one of the things you guys - especially Marty - need to understand about this fricking blog.</p>
<p>I say what I think. Not what somebody wants me to, not what I want you to, but what I think. If I think someone is an asshole I say it, if I think they aren&#8217;t, I say it. No double-super-secret messages to decode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/01/the-common-feature-in-bushs-only-two-vetoes/#comment-75211</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 01:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6339#comment-75211</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Actually, no... I was only referring to term used by some people. &lt;/em&gt;

What's that? The "some say..." construction? You have studied the master well, grasshopper.

Let us hear no more accusations against Mr. Willis of "insinuation" from you.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Actually, no&#8230; I was only referring to term used by some people. </em></p>
<p>What&#8217;s that? The &#8220;some say&#8230;&#8221; construction? You have studied the master well, grasshopper.</p>
<p>Let us hear no more accusations against Mr. Willis of &#8220;insinuation&#8221; from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/01/the-common-feature-in-bushs-only-two-vetoes/#comment-75210</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 23:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6339#comment-75210</guid>
		<description>Oh, this is nice.
&lt;blockquote&gt;A RECORD OF ACCOMPLISHMENT AROUND THE WORLD:

The Administration has pursued a policy of promoting freedom and human dignity in every part of the world. We pursue this policy both because it is right and because it also addresses the fear, hatred, and inequality
that contributes to terrorism and violence.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Geneva Conventions notwithstanding. Extraordinary renditions notwithstanding.

Jack Bauer, where are you?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, this is nice.</p>
<blockquote><p>A RECORD OF ACCOMPLISHMENT AROUND THE WORLD:</p>
<p>The Administration has pursued a policy of promoting freedom and human dignity in every part of the world. We pursue this policy both because it is right and because it also addresses the fear, hatred, and inequality<br />
that contributes to terrorism and violence.</p></blockquote>
<p>Geneva Conventions notwithstanding. Extraordinary renditions notwithstanding.</p>
<p>Jack Bauer, where are you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/01/the-common-feature-in-bushs-only-two-vetoes/#comment-75209</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 23:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6339#comment-75209</guid>
		<description>Yes, Frank, I'm sure Kim Kardashian has a list of George Bush's positive accomplishments.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Frank, I&#8217;m sure Kim Kardashian has a list of George Bush&#8217;s positive accomplishments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilbur</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/01/the-common-feature-in-bushs-only-two-vetoes/#comment-75208</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 22:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6339#comment-75208</guid>
		<description>I guess the answer to my question is "yes, it is possible".
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the answer to my question is &#8220;yes, it is possible&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fd10801</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/01/the-common-feature-in-bushs-only-two-vetoes/#comment-75207</link>
		<dc:creator>fd10801</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 22:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6339#comment-75207</guid>
		<description>Of course! What else would such a list be?

It has been predicted:
&lt;b&gt;Why even bother?&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;b&gt;It's not worth the effort.&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;b&gt;What thing could you say about him here, that would pass for good?&lt;/b&gt;
Posted by: &lt;b&gt;fd10801 &#124; May 2, 2007 2:48:32 PM&lt;/b&gt;

Where would I get such a list, where the list would satisfy you?
Maybe from one of these blogs?

Altercation
American Politics Journal
Atrios
Benny's World
Bob Geiger
Brad Blog
Bring It On!
Calling All Wingnuts
Celebrity Pictures
Cliff Schecter
CREW
Crooks &#038; Liars
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Daou Report
David Sirota
Deltoid
Digby
DKelSmith
Eat The Press
Ed Cone
Ezra Klein
Feministe
Firedoglake
First Draft
First Draft
Flavia Colgan
Glenn Greenwald
HuffPo
Hughes for America
ImproveMan
James Wolcott
John Edwards
Jon Swift
Jousting for Justice
Kevin Drum
Kirsten Powers
Kung Fu Monkey
Mark Warner
Mathew Gross
Maximum365
Music Videos
MyDD
National Chronicle
News America Now
One Billion Movies
Pandagon
Paul Waldman
Pharyngula
QandO
Raising Kaine
Reality-Based Community
Rude Pundit
Sadly, No
Scoobie Davis
Seeing the Forest
Shakespeare's Sister
Stakeholder
Steve Michel
Suburban Guerrilla
Talking Points Memo
Tapped
TBogg
The Horse's Mouth
The Poor Man
The Sideshow
Think Progress
This Modern World
Total Centrist
TPMCafe
TPMmuckraker
TVNewser
Washington Fix
Waveflux
Wes Clark
Will Bunch
Wonkette
Xoverboard
Kim Kardashian
Boomnation

Or maybe &lt;a href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;?&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course! What else would such a list be?</p>
<p>It has been predicted:<br />
<b>Why even bother?</b></p>
<p><b>It&#8217;s not worth the effort.</b></p>
<p><b>What thing could you say about him here, that would pass for good?</b><br />
Posted by: <b>fd10801 | May 2, 2007 2:48:32 PM</b></p>
<p>Where would I get such a list, where the list would satisfy you?<br />
Maybe from one of these blogs?</p>
<p>Altercation<br />
American Politics Journal<br />
Atrios<br />
Benny&#8217;s World<br />
Bob Geiger<br />
Brad Blog<br />
Bring It On!<br />
Calling All Wingnuts<br />
Celebrity Pictures<br />
Cliff Schecter<br />
CREW<br />
Crooks &#038; Liars<br />
Daily Howler<br />
Daily Kos<br />
Daou Report<br />
David Sirota<br />
Deltoid<br />
Digby<br />
DKelSmith<br />
Eat The Press<br />
Ed Cone<br />
Ezra Klein<br />
Feministe<br />
Firedoglake<br />
First Draft<br />
First Draft<br />
Flavia Colgan<br />
Glenn Greenwald<br />
HuffPo<br />
Hughes for America<br />
ImproveMan<br />
James Wolcott<br />
John Edwards<br />
Jon Swift<br />
Jousting for Justice<br />
Kevin Drum<br />
Kirsten Powers<br />
Kung Fu Monkey<br />
Mark Warner<br />
Mathew Gross<br />
Maximum365<br />
Music Videos<br />
MyDD<br />
National Chronicle<br />
News America Now<br />
One Billion Movies<br />
Pandagon<br />
Paul Waldman<br />
Pharyngula<br />
QandO<br />
Raising Kaine<br />
Reality-Based Community<br />
Rude Pundit<br />
Sadly, No<br />
Scoobie Davis<br />
Seeing the Forest<br />
Shakespeare&#8217;s Sister<br />
Stakeholder<br />
Steve Michel<br />
Suburban Guerrilla<br />
Talking Points Memo<br />
Tapped<br />
TBogg<br />
The Horse&#8217;s Mouth<br />
The Poor Man<br />
The Sideshow<br />
Think Progress<br />
This Modern World<br />
Total Centrist<br />
TPMCafe<br />
TPMmuckraker<br />
TVNewser<br />
Washington Fix<br />
Waveflux<br />
Wes Clark<br />
Will Bunch<br />
Wonkette<br />
Xoverboard<br />
Kim Kardashian<br />
Boomnation</p>
<p>Or maybe <a href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/" rel="nofollow">?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilbur</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/01/the-common-feature-in-bushs-only-two-vetoes/#comment-75206</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 22:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6339#comment-75206</guid>
		<description>Gosh, Frank, is it possible that you don't realize how pathetic that litany of links is?

I mean seriously:  you confine yourself to the most rabidly partisan sources and still, the best you can come up with is in-house propaganda from 2001 and ludicrous lists of "accomplishments" like  "President Bush presents Medal of Freedom to George Tenet" (link #3).

I'm sure Dilbert's pointy-haired boss has a simlar list of accomplishments.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, Frank, is it possible that you don&#8217;t realize how pathetic that litany of links is?</p>
<p>I mean seriously:  you confine yourself to the most rabidly partisan sources and still, the best you can come up with is in-house propaganda from 2001 and ludicrous lists of &#8220;accomplishments&#8221; like  &#8220;President Bush presents Medal of Freedom to George Tenet&#8221; (link #3).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure Dilbert&#8217;s pointy-haired boss has a simlar list of accomplishments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fd10801</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/01/the-common-feature-in-bushs-only-two-vetoes/#comment-75205</link>
		<dc:creator>fd10801</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 21:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6339#comment-75205</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;b) Though I admit I am biased against answer (a), evidence against it includes the fact that we've turned out to be right about quite a few important issues over the past few years.&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;b&gt;evidence against it includes the fact that we've turned out to be right about quite a few important issues over the past few years&lt;/b&gt;
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>b) Though I admit I am biased against answer (a), evidence against it includes the fact that we&#8217;ve turned out to be right about quite a few important issues over the past few years.</i><br />
<b>evidence against it includes the fact that we&#8217;ve turned out to be right about quite a few important issues over the past few years</b><br />
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fd10801</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/01/the-common-feature-in-bushs-only-two-vetoes/#comment-75204</link>
		<dc:creator>fd10801</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 21:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6339#comment-75204</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www1.va.gov/opa/pressrel/pressrelease.cfm?id=307" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www1.va.gov/opa/pressrel/pressrelease.cfm?id=307" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www1.va.gov/opa/pressrel/pressrelease.cfm?id=307&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Batterer up!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www1.va.gov/opa/pressrel/pressrelease.cfm?id=307" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www1.va.gov/opa/pressrel/pressrelease.cfm?id=307" rel="nofollow">http://www1.va.gov/opa/pressrel/pressrelease.cfm?id=307</a></p>
<p>Batterer up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fd10801</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/01/the-common-feature-in-bushs-only-two-vetoes/#comment-75203</link>
		<dc:creator>fd10801</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 21:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6339#comment-75203</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1194891/posts" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1194891/posts" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1194891/posts&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
{see Post # 2}

&lt;a href="http://www.doi.gov/Hunters_Anglers_Accomplishments.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.doi.gov/Hunters_Anglers_Accomplishments.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.doi.gov/Hunters_Anglers_Accomplishments.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1194891/posts" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1194891/posts" rel="nofollow">http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1194891/posts</a><br />
{see Post # 2}</p>
<p><a href="http://www.doi.gov/Hunters_Anglers_Accomplishments.pdf" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.doi.gov/Hunters_Anglers_Accomplishments.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.doi.gov/Hunters_Anglers_Accomplishments.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fd10801</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/01/the-common-feature-in-bushs-only-two-vetoes/#comment-75202</link>
		<dc:creator>fd10801</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 21:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6339#comment-75202</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boycottliberalism.com/Bush.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.boycottliberalism.com/Bush.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.boycottliberalism.com/Bush.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href="http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2003/July/03_crt_414.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2003/July/03_crt_414.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2003/July/03_crt_414.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.boycottliberalism.com/Bush.htm" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.boycottliberalism.com/Bush.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.boycottliberalism.com/Bush.htm</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2003/July/03_crt_414.htm" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2003/July/03_crt_414.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2003/July/03_crt_414.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fd10801</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/01/the-common-feature-in-bushs-only-two-vetoes/#comment-75201</link>
		<dc:creator>fd10801</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 21:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6339#comment-75201</guid>
		<description>Here's a few websites on Pres. Bush's accomplishments -- more to follow

I was going to set up categories, where you could disqualify the contribution by number (#1 Clinton actually did it; #2  It was Congress, etc., but I thought I’d let you do the work)’

This represents “accomplishments of Bush administration (without quotes) 5 Google pages in

&lt;a href="http://www.dot.gov/affairs/dot07401.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dot.gov/affairs/dot07401.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.dot.gov/affairs/dot07401.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href="http://www.ccd21.org/news/white_house_factsheet.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ccd21.org/news/white_house_factsheet.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.ccd21.org/news/white_house_factsheet.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a few websites on Pres. Bush&#8217;s accomplishments &#8212; more to follow</p>
<p>I was going to set up categories, where you could disqualify the contribution by number (#1 Clinton actually did it; #2  It was Congress, etc., but I thought I’d let you do the work)’</p>
<p>This represents “accomplishments of Bush administration (without quotes) 5 Google pages in</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dot.gov/affairs/dot07401.htm" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.dot.gov/affairs/dot07401.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.dot.gov/affairs/dot07401.htm</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ccd21.org/news/white_house_factsheet.htm" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.ccd21.org/news/white_house_factsheet.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ccd21.org/news/white_house_factsheet.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fd10801</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/01/the-common-feature-in-bushs-only-two-vetoes/#comment-75200</link>
		<dc:creator>fd10801</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 21:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6339#comment-75200</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;That kind of total moral incompetence: that's Bush to a T&lt;/i&gt;
Everyone here is entitled to their opinion, and I claim no expertise in this area, but based on what I've read here over the years, moral competence may be beyond the ken of about 95% of the posters here.

I'm just sayin'.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>That kind of total moral incompetence: that&#8217;s Bush to a T</i><br />
Everyone here is entitled to their opinion, and I claim no expertise in this area, but based on what I&#8217;ve read here over the years, moral competence may be beyond the ken of about 95% of the posters here.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just sayin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fd10801</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/01/the-common-feature-in-bushs-only-two-vetoes/#comment-75199</link>
		<dc:creator>fd10801</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 21:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6339#comment-75199</guid>
		<description>Actually, no... I was only referring to term used by some people. To assume that a person is never doing anything right, but is always doing something evil, intentionally or unintentionally, is certainly an erroneous judgment.

The term "derangement" is not mine, and is not to my understanding, limited to that aspect alone.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, no&#8230; I was only referring to term used by some people. To assume that a person is never doing anything right, but is always doing something evil, intentionally or unintentionally, is certainly an erroneous judgment.</p>
<p>The term &#8220;derangement&#8221; is not mine, and is not to my understanding, limited to that aspect alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilbur</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/01/the-common-feature-in-bushs-only-two-vetoes/#comment-75198</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 21:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6339#comment-75198</guid>
		<description>mambo, you seem to think unintentional evil is not evil.  I think the opposite is quite often the case.  I once read a book by Scott Peck, a darling of the religous right, describing cases of what he considered 'evil' from his counseling practice.  He had a number of convincing examples, like the parents who gave their son a rifle for his birthday  - the very same rifle that his older brother had used to commit suicide.  The parents were apparently genuinely astounded at the notion that they might have done something wrong.

That kind of total moral incompetence: that's Bush to a T.  The fact that he may not intend evil does not make what he does any less evil.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mambo, you seem to think unintentional evil is not evil.  I think the opposite is quite often the case.  I once read a book by Scott Peck, a darling of the religous right, describing cases of what he considered &#8216;evil&#8217; from his counseling practice.  He had a number of convincing examples, like the parents who gave their son a rifle for his birthday  - the very same rifle that his older brother had used to commit suicide.  The parents were apparently genuinely astounded at the notion that they might have done something wrong.</p>
<p>That kind of total moral incompetence: that&#8217;s Bush to a T.  The fact that he may not intend evil does not make what he does any less evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/01/the-common-feature-in-bushs-only-two-vetoes/#comment-75197</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 21:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6339#comment-75197</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;It's the inability to do that as far as Pres. Bush is concerned that some people would describe as "Bush Derangement Syndrome".&lt;/em&gt;

But then, by assuming "derangement," one would be just as guilty, no?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>It&#8217;s the inability to do that as far as Pres. Bush is concerned that some people would describe as &#8220;Bush Derangement Syndrome&#8221;.</em></p>
<p>But then, by assuming &#8220;derangement,&#8221; one would be just as guilty, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilbur</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/01/the-common-feature-in-bushs-only-two-vetoes/#comment-75196</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 21:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6339#comment-75196</guid>
		<description>um, that was me.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um, that was me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/01/the-common-feature-in-bushs-only-two-vetoes/#comment-75195</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 20:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6339#comment-75195</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;What thing could you say about him here, that would pass for good?&lt;/i&gt;

Probably nothing.  Now there are two ways to explain that:  a) all us lefties are deluded nutjobs, or b) Bush really is a total f*ckup.

I've seen no evidence that counterindicates the answer (b).  Though I admit I am biased against answer (a), evidence against it includes the fact that we've turned out to be right about quite a few important issues over the past few years.

Even on conservative blogs, the only think I see Bush given consistent props for is pissing off democrats and making wogs' heads explode.

Game's up, Frank.  We call.  You got Joker high against a full house.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What thing could you say about him here, that would pass for good?</i></p>
<p>Probably nothing.  Now there are two ways to explain that:  a) all us lefties are deluded nutjobs, or b) Bush really is a total f*ckup.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen no evidence that counterindicates the answer (b).  Though I admit I am biased against answer (a), evidence against it includes the fact that we&#8217;ve turned out to be right about quite a few important issues over the past few years.</p>
<p>Even on conservative blogs, the only think I see Bush given consistent props for is pissing off democrats and making wogs&#8217; heads explode.</p>
<p>Game&#8217;s up, Frank.  We call.  You got Joker high against a full house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/05/01/the-common-feature-in-bushs-only-two-vetoes/#comment-75194</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 20:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6339#comment-75194</guid>
		<description>That's what I thought.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what I thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
