Sentences can infer nothing.

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare.php

Jimmmm said:
“And of course reporters are mostly liberal. They’re educated. Duh!”

This sentence infers that if you are “educated” you will be “liberal”. I know, I know, it doesn’t come right out and SAY it, so I can understand you confusion.

I was simply pointing out that I am WAY educated, and am not liberal, and ollie has a high school diploma ( I assume) and IS liberal.

See? I was using fact to argue against someone elses point! Amazing huh? I know you don’t see it here much, but I thought I would help you recognize was “discussion” and “argument” looks like in the civilized world….

Ollie never went to college, and I am double-boarded in medicine…

And the current president is a Yale graduate. SO WHAT IS YOUR FUCKING POINT??!!

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare.php

You should expand your “anecdotal” experience there “dr” AGH….

That you’re ignorant to this maxim, and that you post an awful lot during “work” hours casts further doubt on your claim that you’re a doctor.

More proof that education =/= intelligence.

Hey, look over there! Something shiny!

Dan Rather

The various photoshop scandals

Jason Blair

Thank GOD for journalistic ethics….

I’m not sure what the educated crack is about though….Ollie never went to college, and I am double-boarded in medicine…

Case in point: The late Lars-Erik Nelson. A lefty, one would think, no?

Actually, not: http://www.goodbyemag.com/nov00/nelson.html

See, unlike Pedro, who thank GOD is not a newsman, people can separate their personal beliefs and professional actions. Fox News is unique, as it is a party organ.

And of course reporters are mostly liberal. They’re educated. Duh!

You just like being the victim. Also reality has a well known liberal bias and you’re confusing that with reporting.

but hey, prove that the numbers have changed today…..I’ll wait…

Golly, how time flies. That was…lessee…left hand, right hand, left foot, other left foot…uh oh! I plumb ran out of fingers and toes to count how long ago that was, Peed’.

Guess you’ll have to find something written in this century!

In their 1986 book, The Media Elite, political scientists S. Robert Lichter, Stanley Rothman and Linda S. Lichter reported the results of their survey of 240 journalists at the nation’s top media outlets: ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Time, Newsweek and U.S. News & World Report. When asked about their voting patterns, journalists admitted their preference for Democrats:

Of those who say they voted for major party candidates, the proportion of leading journalists who supported the Democratic candidate never drops below 80 percent. In 1972, when more than 60 percent of all voters chose Nixon, over 80 percent among the media elite voted for McGovern. This does not appear to reflect any unique aversion to Nixon. Despite the well-publicized tensions between the press and his administration, leading journalists in 1976 preferred Carter over Ford by the same margin. In fact, in the Democratic landslide of 1964, journalists picked Johnson over Goldwater by a sixteen-to-one margin, or 94 to 6 percent.

Wow 2 whole liberals on the air for one day and pedro gonna freak

I guess you conviently forgot to remember for the better part of 1.5 years MSNBC had three right of center types including Imus, Tucker, and Scarborugh on the air on a daily basis. Couple that with the fact they were also the network that FIRED Phil Donohue in order to hire RW bigot Micheal Savage and I guess in Pedro’s world that makes MSNBC a “liberal” network..

Also could you kindly provide proof of this so called “….. premise that most journalism doesn’t have a lefty bias is just prima facia ridiculous ”

ohh and btw fyi just b/c a media source is critical of a corrupt Republican does not indicate “bias”

The premise that most journalism doesn’t have a lefty bias is just prima facia ridiculous. I don’t even mind that it is there, just recognize it. I used to read the washington post regularly, cause it was a well written paper, you just had to recognize the inherent bias when you read it….