<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Caution On Tenet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/27/caution-on-tenet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/27/caution-on-tenet/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/27/caution-on-tenet/#comment-75563</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6369#comment-75563</guid>
		<description>Well, come on, now. Look how long it took for Robert McNamara to figure out viet Nam was a cluster fu*k.
I'd say this is progress.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, come on, now. Look how long it took for Robert McNamara to figure out viet Nam was a cluster fu*k.<br />
I&#8217;d say this is progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/27/caution-on-tenet/#comment-75562</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 05:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6369#comment-75562</guid>
		<description>Tenet is telling the truth about the "slam dunk" thing. Go back and read Woodward's description of it in Plan of Attack (p.248-249). Tenet, Andrew Card, Bush, and others discussed the case that would be presented to convince the American people that an invasion was justified. After running through it all:

&lt;blockquote&gt;...there was a look on the President's face of, What's this? And then a brief moment of silence.

"Nice try," Bush said. "I don't think this is quite--it's not something that Joe Public would understand or would gain a lot of confidence from.

Card was also underwhelmed. The presentation was a flop. In terms of marketing, the examples didn't work, the charts didn't work, the photos were not gripping, the intercepts were less than compelling.

Bush turned to Tenet. "I've been told all this intelligence about having WMD and this is the best we've got?"

From the end of one of the couches in the Oval Office, Tenet rose up, threw his arms in the air. "It's a slam dunk case!" the DCI said.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

They're not discussing the quality of the &lt;em&gt;evidence.&lt;/em&gt; They're discussing the quality of the &lt;em&gt;presentation!&lt;/em&gt; The "slam dunk" was referring to whether or not people would buy it, not whether the evidence was clear cut.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tenet is telling the truth about the &#8220;slam dunk&#8221; thing. Go back and read Woodward&#8217;s description of it in Plan of Attack (p.248-249). Tenet, Andrew Card, Bush, and others discussed the case that would be presented to convince the American people that an invasion was justified. After running through it all:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;there was a look on the President&#8217;s face of, What&#8217;s this? And then a brief moment of silence.</p>
<p>&#8220;Nice try,&#8221; Bush said. &#8220;I don&#8217;t think this is quite&#8211;it&#8217;s not something that Joe Public would understand or would gain a lot of confidence from.</p>
<p>Card was also underwhelmed. The presentation was a flop. In terms of marketing, the examples didn&#8217;t work, the charts didn&#8217;t work, the photos were not gripping, the intercepts were less than compelling.</p>
<p>Bush turned to Tenet. &#8220;I&#8217;ve been told all this intelligence about having WMD and this is the best we&#8217;ve got?&#8221;</p>
<p>From the end of one of the couches in the Oval Office, Tenet rose up, threw his arms in the air. &#8220;It&#8217;s a slam dunk case!&#8221; the DCI said.</p></blockquote>
<p>They&#8217;re not discussing the quality of the <em>evidence.</em> They&#8217;re discussing the quality of the <em>presentation!</em> The &#8220;slam dunk&#8221; was referring to whether or not people would buy it, not whether the evidence was clear cut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waveflux</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/27/caution-on-tenet/#comment-75561</link>
		<dc:creator>Waveflux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6369#comment-75561</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.waveflux.net/archives/2007/04/so_when_does_he_throw_his_meda.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;What you said.&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.waveflux.net/archives/2007/04/so_when_does_he_throw_his_meda.php" rel="nofollow">What you said.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
